03/24/13
Essay
When one looks back in American history to the mid 1940’s it is almost impossible to not mention the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This was a shocking worldwide event that will be passed down through each generation in nation’s history. But what many overlook and forget is all the stress, planning, and pressures our thirty-third president, Harry S. Truman had to go through when making this extremely difficult decision.
When President Truman first found out about the huge success of the Manhattan Project he knew a great deal of power had shifted to the United States at this point. He didn’t exactly jump the gun on this idea, knowing that thousands of innocent Japanese civilians would be killed if he were to pursue this plan of attack. “The capacity to end the war with Japan was in his hands, but it would involve unleashing the most terrible weapon ever known.(www.ushistory.org)” The atomic bomb test in New Mexico “led Truman to issue the Potsdam Proclamation (which was proposed July 26th 1945), that insisted on unconditional surrender by Japan” without consultation with Joseph Stalin. It is believed that President Truman offered this peace treaty to Japan days before the bombing, and also shared a faint warning that the United States held a great weapon
which pressured on Japan to sign the treaty. But the Emperor of Japan was stubborn and had refused to sign the treaty. He would have rather had bloodshed of millions of soldiers and civilians from both nations continue the war until one had become the victor.
So it was at this point in time, president Truman had a very select few of options he could choose to go against Japan and their emperor.
President Truman had many options at his disposal. Truman could have bomb and blockaded Japan, causing millions of Japanese to die of starvation because the Emperor and his military forces were to prideful to give in to the peace treaty. President Truman had the option to directly enter battle with them on “Japanese mainland.” After winning those bloody battles at Okinawa and Iwo Jima, that put us within reasonable striking distance to attack the Japanese mainland by air support. President Truman was also given the option to hold a “demonstration of the destructive power of the atomic bomb,” which was supposed to be used as a scare tactic for the Japanese. It sounded like a good idea in theory because a weapon of mass destruction on that scale was unthinkable during that time period. But I think the Emperor of Japan and Japan as a nation were too stubborn and prideful to back down and negotiate with the U.S. Another alternative for President Truman was too sit back and wait for Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union to enter the war on August 15th. So looking back on all the different options and alternatives President Truman had in dealing with Japan, to me he chose the best one which was
bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Due to the extremely high tension between the two nations especially after the attack of Pearl Harbor, I think Truman was justified in his action. He laid it all out on the table from the get go when he proposed the postdam proclamation, asking Japan to negotiate and surrender. Unfortunately it wasn’t that easy for President Truman and he had to attack with brute force. But in the long run it was a smart move for President Truman, as we were able to save millions of American lives and end the war quickly. After dropping the infamous Atom bombs on August 6th and August 9th in 1945 on Japan in World War II. President Truman was being harshly criticized all around the world for his decision on ending the war. Many saw President Truman’s decision as “a barbaric act that brought negative long-term consequences to the United States “and many were saying, “A new age of nuclear terror led to a dangerous arms race.” Many even believed that the Japan was ready to give in to the negotiation and the bombings were totally unnecessary. Others said that this was a racist attack and “that such a device would never have been used against white civilians.” Truman later released a statement that the use of the atomic bombs was “purely military” and any other alternative would have resulted in an enormous amount of casualties on both sides. So he chose what he thought was the most efficient way of ending the war. At this point in time no other country in the world had used or hinted that they had weapons of mass destruction. So when the United States did this it basically stated our dominance in this era and looking back no other nukes have been dropped since (knocks on wood). Many also believe that the dropping of
the atomic bombs hinted the Soviet Union to tread softly with U.S., giving a slight nudge into the Cold War. So overall the United States and President Truman did what they thought was right at the time and because of that the United States was basically seen as a bully and criticized for using unnecessary aggression. But when you go back and look at the facts, I believe President Truman’s decision to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki were purely justified for our benefit. Did it save many American lives? Yes, it even probably saved Japanese lives in the long run if we were to continue battle against each other and it ended the war immediately. So I believe President Truman’s initial decision resolved the initial problem of ending the war. The most severe consequence the United States faced was right after ending one war they had entered yet another. The Cold war with Soviet Russia which caused us billions of dollars and millions of people died because of it. The Cold war was almost impossible to avoid. After World War II, the U.S. and Soviet Unions’ government clearly opposed each other so conflict was inevitable. But after seeing the United States use nuclear forces on Japan, this could have possibly stopped a nuclear war against the Soviet’s which instead causing a “Cold War.” This in theory saved millions from dying. So in conclusion, after analyzing the thought process and options President Truman had to evaluate and go through. I think he stepped up as the leader of our country and made a decision that nobody else could.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
1. Continue the conventional bombings and blockade. Truman could have relied on the B-29 firebombing raids on Japan's cities that could have combined with the naval blockade to wear down the Japanese resistance and force their surrender. Scholars that were critical of this approach pointed out that the bombing may have taken some time to force a surrender putting American pilots, troops and sailors at risk.…
- 415 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Describe what decision Truman wrestled with as WWII was drawing to a close and be able to identify and support both sides of the argument…
- 4634 Words
- 19 Pages
Powerful Essays -
on Japan. Truman received a lot of support from the people of the United States until he began…
- 199 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The first option would allow President Truman to end the war peacefully, and it would have also allowed the Japanese to withdraw from the war without shame to their leader and save the thousands of Japanese individuals by not making the United States have to make the choice of dropping the atomic bombs. This option would have let Truman show that “We as Americans have not sunk to the level of our enemies” “We should end the war now in a manner that reflects the value we place on the sanctity of human life and the dignity of the individual”. The author gives Truman a second option and this option approaches the war in the Pacific with a demonstration of the atomic bomb in efforts to force the Japanese to surrender without condition. This includes the uprising of the Manhattan Project which gave the United States the “weapon of almost inconceivable power” with the scare tactics of the demonstration this gives the Japanese leaders an idea of what would…
- 629 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
During World War II, the Japanese and Americans were at war. Japan had an advantage over American military troops with a greater number of troops being put out into the war. On the other hand, American troops and military bases had a technological advantage, which ultimately helped the Americans succeed during the war. President Truman made one of the most difficult decisions in American history. Truman’s decision would kill many Japanese soldiers but would save many of the Americans. An atomic bomb would be the last resort, which would wipe out countless miles of land, military bases, and anyone who was close by. As Truman had to think about the pros and cons of this decision, it was ultimately Truman’s say so in whether to proceed and…
- 999 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…
- 537 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
However, President Truman was under heavy influence of the then Secretary of State, James F. Byrnes, who said that Truman would be “crucified politically” if he made any sort of deal with the Japanese. The President took his advice and no deal was offered to the Japanese that could have ended the war without killing anyone. This is the main example on how America handled the situation poorly. If America had warned the Japanese about the atomic bomb, then the attack would seem less evil and vicious. It would have also have made it more justifiable to drop the bomb if they warned the Japanese.…
- 215 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…
- 125 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
A key reason for Truman’s decision to drop the Atomic Bomb was the alternative options were not proper solutions. Dropping the bomb wasn’t the only considered option. The main “runner up” was a mass invasion of Japan. This idea was very dangerous. The casualties for the US were projected to be over 1,000,000 soldiers, and 5,000,000 japanese soldiers. One of the other alternatives was the idea of displaying to true power of the atomic weapon to Japan through a test. Such an idea had way too many flaws to be applicable. There was only enough Plutonium and Uranium available to the US for two bombs, (Little Boy, Fat Man). Also this idea was a risk because if the weapon did not detonate, the US would look even weaker to the Japanese. The idea of barricading the Japanese was also a considered solution, using Naval vessels to trap the Japanese in until the US “starved them out”. The fault in this idea was the unreasonable amount of time and resources it would consume. After weighing the options, and thinking it through carefully, President Truman made the correct choice to drop the bomb.…
- 498 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Truman was forced to choose between fighting Communism and faithfully executing the Constitution. He should have used the war power of the presidency set by the Framers in order to achieve both goals but he did not and as a result he was forced to face the consequences of his actions.…
- 294 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…
- 1290 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Alperovitz argues that Truman and his Secretary of State, James F. Byrnes, thought that if they did not end World War II by dropping the atomic bomb, America would not have added diplomacy strength against the Soviet Union. Alperovitz insists that the decision to drop the bomb could have bolstered the diplomacy objectives in Asia. For example, if the bomb was not dropped it could have created a more harmonious postwar relationship with the Soviet Union. How would Truman have ended the war without dropping the bomb and without having a large amount of casualties? Alperovitz says that the President could have been more eager to welcome the Soviets into the Asian…
- 745 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Presidents of the United States of America have a very demanding profession while in office, one that requires them to constantly make difficult decisions that often affect hundreds of millions of people. These decisions become even more plentiful and complicated when the U.S. is fighting a war. President Harry S. Truman was one such unlucky individual who had to step up and be the man to make the hard choices on what the U.S. was to do in the bloodiest war in history, World War II. He only held that position for the last six months of the war, but he had the toughest moral decision presented to any world leader during the entirety of the war. He had to decide whether or not to use a new and immensely powerful weapon to quickly put an end…
- 1319 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
military could see that. “On June 8 and imperial conference adopted The Fundamental Policy to be Followed Henceforth in the Conduct of the War”. This policy meant that the Japanese pledged to “prosecute the war to the bitter end, in order to uphold the national polity, protect the imperial land and accomplish the objectives for which we went to war” (Maddox). This policy, this pledge meant nothing other than what it said. Leaving President Truman in a tough situation. This policy meant that the Japanese were going to fight and die fighting. They were going to continue this war until they had gotten what they wanted to, until they had gotten what they had entered this war for. Japan's unwillingness to surrender was one of the reasons President Truman was forced to use the…
- 270 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are compelling arguments on both sides. According to our military leaders, peace at that point might have been achieved by negotiation. The Japanese navy no longer existed, fuel and spare parts were on short supply, and they were losing with China. The Japanese people were starving under the blockade. The Emperor put Japan under Martial Law, anticipating a revolt by the people to end the war. Yet, what were the reasons for using this new weapon of mass destruction? For sure, it would mean a quick end to a long, bloody war, which everyone wanted. But, maybe Truman wanted to send a message to Russia and China, who without a doubt would be the next enemies the U.S. would have to contend with. An invasion would have cost many more American lives, and the people were tired of the…
- 598 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays