Linking New Product Development to Strategy
By Gary Getz and Pedro do Carmo Costa
Many companies implement Stage-Gate or other forms of new product development processes that promise to accelerate growth while managing risk. Few, however, are satisfied with the output of their efforts. One potential reason for their dissatisfaction is the disconnection between their organization’s new product development (NPD) and strategy development processes. Without this connection, product development pipelines become stuffed with incremental extensions of existing products but void of breakthrough concepts. Is this your company? Ask yourself: • Is it easy for your colleagues to justify the strategic alignment of their new product concepts? between Apple’s new product pipeline for iPods and its overall strategy. Gary Getz is a California-based Managing Director and Pedro do Carmo Costa is the Iberian office Managing Director of Strategos, a strategy and innovation firm. Gary works with clients in industries from orange juice to computers, and from wireless communications to insurance on resolving their most significant business strategy, corporate growth, and customer and channel management issues. Pedro helps clients architecting and deploying industry revolutions that challenge the status quo and create opportunities for growth. For more information visit www.strategos.com or email them at ggetz@strategos.com and pccosta@strategos.com. Imagine that you were a top executive at Apple at the turn of the millennium and that you were presented with the opportunity of developing a Macintosh-only digital music player. Would you have devoted your company’s top engineers and designers to this roject? If you say no, you are not alone. On the surface, a Mac-only anything was going to be a small opportunity, and MP3 players were simply not core to computer makers. Therefore, most seasoned managers would also have said no.
• Does your organization consistently fail to provide adequate funding for longer-term opportunities? • Does your organization reject many ideas because they are too risky (no one in the industry is doing anything like it) while at the same time rejecting scores of others because they are not different enough (the field is already crowded)?
By now there is no doubt the iPod family of products resurrected Apple’s fortunes by transforming the company from a niche player in personal computers to a market maker in consumer electronics. Today, no one would question the brilliance of the strategy. But when Apple unveiled the first generation iPod in 2001, few could foresee iPod’s revolutionary impact on consumer electronics, music and the cell-phone industries. This was evident by looking at the postings of a Mac online community on the date of the iPod unveiling (October 23, 2001). The reactions were universally negative. Here are some of the comments: • “iPod? iPoop... iCry. I was so hoping for something more.” • “No! Just what the world needs, another freaking MP3 player. Go Steve! Where's the Newton?!”
If you answer yes to any of these questions, the linkage between your NPD and strategy development processes is probably broken. Before we talk about how to fix the broken linkage, let’s first review what success looks like. Take, for example, the tight connection
• “What a load of tripe! Gee! An mp3 player with a HD! How original! Kinda reminds me of a JUKEBOX I once knew...”
• “This isn't revolutionary! I still can't believe this! All this hype for something so ridiculous! Who cares about an MP3 player? I want something new! I want them to think differently! Why oh why would they do this?! It's so wrong! It's so stupid!”
Fortunately for Apple, that’s not the whole story. The initial iPod and iTunes were just the first step in its ambitious “Digital Hub” strategy, where the ultimate goal was to allow
© Copyright 2008 Strategos. All rights reserved.
users to have all of the entertainment content they want accessible to them whenever and wherever they want it (see Figure 1 for a hypothetical illustration of the Digital Hub strategy). With this strategic perspective, the Macintosh-only digital music player was therefore a low risk and logical entry into this robust new business space where Apple had limited knowledge.
The first few generations of iPod and iTunes were learning opportunities for Apple. From there Apple extended into the array of products we know today. Retrospectively, the product roadmap probably looked something like the chart below (Figure 2 – Retrospective Illustration of Apple’s Digital Hub Product Roadmap). Obviously, with the benefit of hindsight, the reconstructed product roadmap is quite robust, and the 2001 version would not have been this complete, as the specificities of later products were based on the lessons learned from their ancestors and older siblings.
Figure 1 – Hypothetical Illustration of Apple’s Digital Hub Strategy
Specifically, while great design and ease of use have always been a core value and a key competence of Apple, early lessons from the first few generations of iPod and iTunes helped Apple refine its overall strategy. One of the other key lessons Apple learned was how to generate consumer buzz. When launching the first three generations of iPods, Apple’s marketing efforts were centered on touting the expanded array of functions and features (or WHAT it could do). Instead, the buzz came from the slick click wheel (or HOW it’s done), as early owners were busily showing off their cool devices to their friends. Apple learned that the collision of sophisticated technologies with coolness generated consumer buzz. So it painstakingly built nifty ways for performing ordinary tasks in later editions of everything, from scrolling
Figure 2 – Retrospective Illustration of Apple’s Digital Hub Product Roadmap
Another key lesson learned was the need to integrate content distribution into the overall offering. The early version of iTunes leveraged a third party provider for Internet radio services, and the iPods used Musicmatch for connecting Windows-based computers. Then, iTunes 4.0 introduced a seamlessly integrated offering from shopping to content management to listening,
miniature pictures of album covers for browsing the music library to “jiggling” icons when customizing the home-screen on an iPhone.
and this helped launched Apple into a music industry powerhouse. So, how do you fix the broken linkage between your new product pipeline and strategy?
Step One: Make sure your strategy is discriminating and informed by actionable opportunities. One manufacturing company’s management team returned from a weekend strategy retreat and proudly announced its revised strategy as, “we will be the nimble gorilla of our industry!” However, the strategy had no discriminating
© Copyright 2008 Strategos. All rights reserved.
Step Two: Start from the future and understand what success looks like. While even Steve Jobs couldn’t have predicted the specific details of iPod Touch or iPhone back in 2001, most could have a notional idea of the scope of products and services that would “allow users to have all of the entertainment content they want accessible to them whenever and wherever they want.” From there, it’s possible to envision a logical roadmap to reach the endstate from the current starting point.
power since nearly everything can be justified as aligned with it, and on Monday, no one knew what new opportunities they should pursue.
Step Three: Build a roadmap that will incorporate a thorough review of the key capability and knowledge gaps for reaching the desired endstate. With this information, early opportunities then can be structured to overcome these gaps as well as fit into the total portfolio of products/services for getting to the end-state. For example, the Photo iPod provided a great amount of learning for managing and integrating third-party content, and that knowledge was then used for email, address book and other content integration.
iPod and iTunes are wonderful products that have inspired countless copycats. However, the imitators could improve their business performance substantially by not duplicating the “form” of Apple’s products but, instead, replicating the core essence that made these products possible—the tight integration between NPD and strategy development processes.
www.strategos.com
© Copyright 2008 Strategos. All rights reserved.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Around the time of Steve Jobs death, Apple is the leader in its industry. If a new ‘cool’ product was to be invented, marketed and brought to consumers, it was Apple. In Burrows and Satariano article “Can Phil Schiller Keep Apple Cool?” they quoted Trip Chowdhry, analyst at Global Equities Research who leaves an open question asked of all great companies who became the clear cut leader in their industry; “They’re at the top----and when you’re at the top, there’s only one way to go if you don’t reinvent yourself” (Burrows & Satariano,2012). Generic strategies that can be implemented to prevent a down slide is continue to forecast consumers’ needs 3-5 years in advance as well as continue to overspend in research and development.…
- 493 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“Be the brand of choice in the hearts and minds of our customers by delivering the best customer experience.” This happens to be Sony’s mission. Sony’s innovation strategy is different to mainstream business strategy because it needs to comprehensively accommodate uncertainty. Many common approaches to business strategy are inappropriate for innovative businesses. Some uncertainty (unknowable futures) is always present in strategic management of incremental innovation, but is a major strategic factor in radical innovation. Conventional strategy analysis tools such as Porter’s five forces industry analysis are useful for low levels of uncertainty but as uncertainty increases, the key elements of successful strategy become search and responsiveness, helping firms to react to unforeseen events (Courtney, Kirkland, and Viguerie 1997).…
- 1215 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
When companies employ a product development strategy, they continue selling within the existing market. Companies may also be forced to add new products as older ones become outmoded.…
- 1803 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In our textbook[1], it says to move quickly and also avoid expensive new-product failures, companies should follow an organized new-product development process: (1) idea generation, (2) screening, (3) idea evaluation, (4) development (of product and marketing mix), and (5) commercialization. The hypothesis to have marketers to discover product flaws early, and find the remedy to it, has proven unprofitable. This process requires much analysis of the idea before the company spends money to develop and market a product.…
- 1196 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The term “product development” inject a process that involves creation, development, and modification of an existing product. It presents the formulation of an entirely new product with different characteristics which offers additional benefits to satisfy the market or a specific customer. The globalized world of business regards product development as the process of designing, creating and marketing new products or services to benefit customers. The discipline is focused on developing systematic methods for guiding all the processes involved in getting a new product to market. However, according to Melissa A. Schilling, “for technologies in which standardization and compatibility are important, maintaining the integrity of the core product is absolutely essential, and external development can put it at risk (Schilling, 2011, p. 205 Ebook).”…
- 1824 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
References: [ Stage-Gate International . (2012). Product Innovation Process. Retrieved March 16, 2012, from Stage-Gate International : http://www.stage-gate.com/knowledge_pipwhat.php ]…
- 373 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
1, What are the strategic options for product and/or market development for the organisation? – Ansoff’s product-matrix…
- 5716 Words
- 23 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Apple’s over-arching company strategy follows an innovative, mysterious and customer-centered strategy. One of the main reasons for Apple’s success has to do with their large commitment to satisfying customers while continuously innovating their products and design without creating a sense of “too much” or confusing their consumers through new operating systems. These goals, which create a unique and successful company, are achieved through the ways in which they use the five key strategic elements: arena, differentiators, vehicles, staging and pacing, and economic logic.…
- 1709 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
* Cooper R.G. (2008) “The stage-gate idea-to-launch-process - update. What is new and NexGen systems?” Journal of Product Innovation Management; 25, 3 (May), pp. 213-232.…
- 2454 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Cooper. R. G., & Kleinschmidt. E. J. 1987. New products: What separates winners from losers? Journal of Product Innovation Management. 4: 169-184.…
- 2167 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The innovation process shifted away from innovating incremental products or product line extensions to radical products that are completely new to the market. Emphasizing the importance of this shift, 3M’s top management has set a new objective to generate 30% sales from radical products. 1.2…
- 3096 Words
- 89 Pages
Best Essays -
Rankin, S. (2004). ‘A Mini Case Study of Product Strategy: The Cypher Sent From Cordis (A Johnson & Johnson Company)’. Marketing Review, 4(2), pp. 211-224.…
- 1308 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Thompson, A. A., Peteraf, M. A., Gamble, J. E., & Strickland, A. J. (2010). Crafting and executing strategy: The quest for competitive advantage (17th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.…
- 2953 Words
- 8 Pages
Best Essays -
Nokia – the Finnish Information Technology multinational giant – can be understood as nothing but an important milestone within the modern day organizational change management concepts. Together with increased attention paid towards organizational change management Nokia has become one of the main considerations due to certain ups and downs which the organization has been compelled to undertake as a result of poor organizational change management. This is where the case study concentrates on Nokia as an organization which has featured poor leadership, a series of misses, slow product development and marketing efforts as well as weak collaboration within internal segments of the organization lately.…
- 3439 Words
- 14 Pages
Best Essays -
This article continues to operationally define and test the resourcehased view of the firm in a study of the major U.S. film studios from…
- 10345 Words
- 51 Pages
Good Essays