Preview

Lord Of The Flies Hobbes Vs Locke

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
584 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lord Of The Flies Hobbes Vs Locke
Lord of the Flies: Hobbes vs. Locke
In the novel, Lord of The Flies by William Golding, several young boys are stranded on an island and must maintain civilization on their own with no real authority. Their attempt at maintaining a peaceful and civilized state between each other can help to explain the theories of philosophy stated by Jack Hobbes and John Locke. In Locke’s philosophy, he states that people are naturally good. He believes that is in our nature, as humans, to be good people and do what it is that we know is right and what we are told is right. Hobbes, on the contrary, believes that we have a very selfish nature and often do what is in our best interest, regardless of what we are told is right. Their philosophies can help to explain the novel by revealing the reasoning for some of the behaviors that the boys reveal and the actions that they demonstrate.
…show more content…
One of the boys, Ralph, gets voted to take leadership and assigns responsibilities for the group. Ralph assigns the choir to be the hunters and their leader, Jack, is assigned a co-leadership position under Ralph. Although Ralph is voted leader of the group, Jack still strives for a main leadership position, causing conflict between the two. Jack then takes complete control over his choir, the hunters, and they separate into their own group, apart from Ralph and the rest of the boys. This eventually leads all of the boys to a brutal and violent nature, ending in the cold-blooded killing of two members of Ralph’s group, Simon and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hobbes believed and thought this way because he saw how the people lived in harsh conditions,and how people that were on the side of the road and nobody would help them.Hobbes believed that the people should enter a social contract ,to escape the harsh ways of life. He believed that the social contract was the only way that could advance people from living in such hard condition during this time.Thomas Hobbes had a very different point of view than John Locke but Hobbes wanted the best form of government for the people.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The boys all stick together in the beginning. Ralph and Jack, being the two individuals with the most power, lead the group. Throughout the novel, Ralph and Jack are constantly butting heads. This starts two problems.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As soon as Jack was standing in front of the boys, he knew he wanted to be chief of these lost children. Instead of Jack being elected, Ralph was, and this sparked a slight emotion of mortification and jealousy within him. Right after Ralph gets elected as chief of the group of boys, Jack…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each boy is given a job from Ralph, but they never complete their tasks, such as building shelter for the toddlers or keeping the signal fire burning. This looses the boy’s chances of surviving, and finding help to leave the island. Even Jack is not a mature or humble leader. He displays this when being the leader of the hunters. Jack leads everyone into chaos; such as applying war paint before hunting and starting the hunter dance. Evidently lack of leadership and maturity leads to violence on the island.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ralph organizes everyone into separate groups and assigns them with different tasks. Jack didn’t win the “chief” role, so he is a little upset, but Ralph told him he could be in charge of the choir boys because he already had some form of authority over them. One of the groups assigned for exploring the island and hunting food consisted of Ralph, Jack, and Simon. They trek through the island until they finally come across their first animal sighting, a baby pig. Jack hesitates to kill the baby pig because he is scared of the large amounts of blood, but doesn’t want to be embarrassed by the other boys so he makes excuses saying he just “didn’t know” where to stab it.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau Vs Hobbes

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    In favor of Hobbes, he does make several valid points. His theory in regards to constant competition applies to this day, as people constantly find themselves in situations where they meet others that are of equal physical strengths and could be faced with a conflict as a result. Despite the points that Hobbes makes, his theory is overall negative, as living in a constant state of fear and paranoia is absolutely no way to live one’s life. Rousseau is very pertinent to remind others of how life was before society and technology took over. Life was extremely simple, and everyone was fairly alright with living alone and focusing on themselves and their life. If today’s society was the same as it was over a thousand years ago, almost no one would…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page

    Throughout history, people have debated about what government is, and what is the purpose of it. Should the government dictate people's lives and tell them what to do? Should the government be permissive and just allow the people take care of themselves and not step in? Should there be an in between? Two very influential philosophers from the 17th century Enlightenment, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, are preeminent influences on how people see what a government is and what role it should take. They both were renowned influences in many governments, even to this day. Locke took the side that people are naturally good, and that they should rule themselves. While on the other hand, Hobbes said that humans are naturally brutish and evil,…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke and Hobbes

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    How does the founders' view of power affect the framers' reactions to John Locke? According to Locke, how does man enter the political society and what is the purpose of that society? What obligations does the government have in the civil society? What obligation does the individual have? How do Hobbes and Locke differ? Do you think Americans would agree with Locke? You may read the first paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence to assist you. What evidence do you have to support your view?…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jack:The other boy who has the leadership skills.Savage,barbaric and egomaniacal. The leader of the hunters and choir.He leads the hunters and hunts animals.He is against Ralph's ideas and he wants to have all power.The more he becomes savage ,the more he is able to control rest of the group.In the end jack has learnt to use boy's fear of the beast to control their behavior.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both Hobbes and Locke shared similarities within their political theories; however their theories also had some major differences. Both men were responding to the crisis of the 17th century and they were highly influenced by the scientific revolution. Hobbes and Locke rejected all previous theories regarding human nature. They used the same methodology, and the men accepted an atomistic view of society. They believed that individuals were rational and were motivated by self-interest. Hobbes and Locke traced their theories from a state of nature to the social contract. They agreed that the legitimacy of the government rested on the consent of the governed. Together, both men rejected legitimate political authorities such as Divine Right of Kings, brute force, historical tradition, and feudal contracts. Both political philosophers offered interesting arguments pertaining to government, human nature, and the state of nature.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The boys abandon Ralph and Piggy and the idea of preparedness in favor of Jack and the hunt. As the boys become absorbed in selfish tendencies and blood lust they become like the beasts they are hunting. Evidence of the boys losing the last sense of humanity are shown when they kill Simon. “The beast struggled forward…At once the crowd surged after it…leapt onto the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no more word, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws” (Golding 153). Browne explains the savagery as a result of limiting altruism or affection. “Let’s face it we are not infinitely compassionate towards our fellow human beings” (Browne). The camp of boys were paranoid and mistook Simon for the infamous beast. Each thought only of their own survival, and under misguided identification killed the beast only to later discover their mistake. Jack and his savages killed Piggy and forced Ralph out. A chase ensues; however, the boys don't realize they are running towards salvation and…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lord of the Flies

    • 333 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ralph wanted the boys to eliminate the fear and focus on fire and rescue while Jack dealt with their fear by hunting the beast. They stand at opposite positions to each other, which is civilization and savagery. Simon and Jack were separated from the group. Fear was controlling them in different ways. Simon was the closest to the answer but end with death. Jack combined the hunters’ fear of beast to form a tribe and has became the chief, he led them by their fear as well.…

    • 333 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays