Preview

management theories

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1159 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
management theories
Classical Management theory and Human Relations theory have played an vital role in the history of modern management .It is two qualitative leap of modern management system. As two relatively complete system of Management theory, Classical Management theory and Human Relations theory has made its own unique contribution. This essay aims to identify key similarities and differences between two theory by comparing detailed aspects which including focus, the comprehension of structure ,basic assumptions of person and the task of leader, simultaneously, exploring how Classical Management theory and Human Relations theory can reconcile the incompatibilities between the approaches.

Classical Management theory was developed during the Industrial Revolution in order to deal withthe problem about inefficiency in the factories. it mainly contained of Weber(1922) 's Bureaucratic management,Taylor(1911) 's Scientific Management and Fayol(1925) 's General Management Principles. As Taylor (1911) wrote in his books "the purpose of scientific management is how achieve the maximum efficiency ",these theory highlighted the importance of using scientific and standardized methods in workplace ; pointed out the study will continue to improve the working methods; determine the many principles to operate the organization more efficiently and emphasized the salary as a potential factor of motivation.

Human Relation theory was proposed by a America behavioral scientist named Mayo (1933) after that Classical Management theory had been presented for nearly 20 years . According to Meyao (1933)the most important factor that effected the productivity are not condition and treatment ,but the human relation in workplace.Human Relation theory stressed the importance of human factors ;advocated improving managers’ interpersonal skills and changing leadership; emphasized the informal organization

Classical Management theory and Human Relations theory contain many aspects


Bibliography: Davis,R.C. (1951) The Fundamentals of Top Management .New York: Harper
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Management Theory Taxonomy
    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Management Theory Taxonomy

    Management theory is important because it is the study of how to make all the…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theories of Scientific Management
    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Theories of Scientific Management

    As I read our text, I discovered that a thoroughly studying and testing different work, methods to identify the best, most efficient way to complete a job is considered Scientific Management. This approach studied the way in which workers performed in an attempt to make the organization run more efficient. Different tasks were broken down into small parts during this study and then each one was analyzed to see what was the best way of doing the task. While on the other hand, the human relations approach argues that people are emotional rather than economic-rational beings. This approach sees people more as just social systems rather than mechanical ones. The Human Relations Management focuses on the people as the major principle instead of the organization.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Management
    • 2350 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Theories of Management

    Leadership refers to one’s ability to effectively influence subordinates to achieve the goals of their organization. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the foundations, methods and thought processes that define the main theories and how leaders use the key model components to achieve desired outcomes. This paper will thoroughly describe these theories in detail and list numerous advantages and disadvantages of each. Though seemingly dissimilar on the surface, each leadership theory presented in this paper share the objective of obtaining the goals of the organization, and when combined these theories can lead to the highest quality leadership. The theories that will be discussed in this paper are: “Great Man” theory, trait theory, contingency theory, situation theory, behavioral theory, participative theory, management theory, and relationship theory.…

    • 2350 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain how the managerial ideas of Taylor and Fayol differ from Mayo. Assess the relevance of Classical Management theorists to the management of contemporary organisations
    • 1304 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Explain how the managerial ideas of Taylor and Fayol differ from Mayo. Assess the relevance of Classical Management theorists to the management of contemporary organisations

    The "Human Relations" approach is associated with the work of E Mayo and F Roethlisberger. Immediately, we can see a difference between the ideas of Taylor and Fayol and those of Mayo as they are even classified differently. In order to explain how these managerial ideas differ, I will first explain what those ideas were.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Human Relations in the Fire Service
    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Human Relations in the Fire Service

    This essay compares and contrasts the “Classical” and “Human Relations” approaches to management. It focuses on how these approaches are similar and compatible and looks at their differences and incompatibilities.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Tight And Loyalty In Hamlet By William Shakespeare
    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Tight And Loyalty In Hamlet By William Shakespeare

    If poetry is supposed to teach through delight and delight through teaching as Sir Philip Sydney claims, shouldn't there be some aspect of light in poetry: of goodness? It seems there should be. In order to rightly delight in something there has to be a good in which to delight. In poetry and plays, therefore, there should be a good in which the audience can delight, but when reading Hamlet by that greatest of masters, William Shakespeare, one might feel as though it was all dark with no relief. It is full to bursting with death and conniving.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    comparing theories of management
    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages

    comparing theories of management

    Theories of leadership and management first came about in the early 1900’s. These early theories were characterized by focus on individual traits and behaviors of successful leaders while later theories examined situational context and the role of followers or subordinates in the success of a leader. Here, I will examine and compare two theories of leadership and management - one from an earlier point in history and one that came about more recently in an attempt to showcase similarities and differences between the who and how each relates to my own personal style of management.…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Human Relation vs Human Resources
    • 4513 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Human Relation vs Human Resources

    There are so many fallacies for instance the term of ‘human relations’ and ‘human resources’ where the contemporary organisation unseen the differences between this two approaches. Both human relations and human resources manager might use the same kind of organisational behaviour but for very different reasons (Miller 2009). Human relations approach emphasize on productivity where the management advocates better on treatment of subordinates in belief that it will lead to greater productivity. According to Miller (2006), the human relation management pay little attention to the individual needs of employees, to nonfinancial rewards in the workplace, or to the prevalence of social interaction in organisations. On the other hand, human resource approach pays more attention on workers’ feeling where theorists recognise that individuals in organisation have feelings that must be considered and also acknowledge that individual labour is an important ingredient for meeting the organisational goal (Miller 2006). Some of the theoretical approaches that could be brought into discussion of the differences between human relations and human resources are from well-known scholars such as Elton Mayo, Abraham Maslow, Fredrick Herzberg, Rensis Likert as well as Robert Blake (Miller 2009).…

    • 4513 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Relation
    • 9191 Words
    • 37 Pages

    Human Relation

    The minutiae of the human soul … emerged as a new domain for management Nikolas Rose Conventional textbooks often set up a simple story about organization theory which has a very appealing structure. In this story, there is a good guy and a bad guy. Who gets to play which role sometimes shifts, but most often the bad guy is the scientific management approach and the good guy is human relations theory. This is a flawed story in my view, and the way I will tell the story emphasizes the many connections and similarities between the two. But I suppose the fact that I am referring to ‘the two’ implies that there must be some points of difference as well. Maybe so, but it is a different sort of difference to that which standard commentaries identify. Human relations theory (HRT) is normally thought of as having its roots in the Hawthorne Studies conducted in the 1920s and 1930s at the Hawthorne works of the Western Electric Company, near Chicago in the United States. These studies have now taken on an almost mythological status within the study of organization, so that the details of what happened there and even when they happened is reported differently in different accounts. For example, different books give 1923, 1924 and 1927 as the date the studies started. Related to this mythology is a disjuncture between these precise details of what was done and what was written and the received version of what human relations theory is. Since human relations theory was the work of many years and many people, it contains a huge amount of variation and nuance (some of it extremely interesting)…

    • 9191 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction to Modern Management
    • 2115 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Introduction to Modern Management

    Zeigler, S. (2014). The difference between a classical management theory & a human relations theory. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/difference-between-classical-management-theory-human-relations-theory-35928.html…

    • 2115 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Theories
    • 6014 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Organizational Theories

    Geisen, E. Riddelberger, E. Christerner, R. & Bell, R. (2010). When to innovate your business.…

    • 6014 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Classical Theory
    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Classical Theory

    Classical management theory and human relations theory represent two views of management on the opposite ends of the spectrum. One view focuses on looking at workers solely as a means to get work done, while the other focuses on developing an organization and the behaviors and motivations of employees. Most managers find that a combination of the two theories serves them best in their businesses.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Human Relations Case Study
    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Human Relations Case Study

    Human relations can be defined as a study of group behavior for the purpose of improving interpersonal and social relationships in work environment. In order to improve work productivity, achieve successful teamwork and understand the importance of managing people, it is necessary for managers to develop appropriate ways how to do it. Human relations management has become a concern of many companies. To increase work productivity each company must create a way how to motivate their employees, see them as individuals and not machines, and provide them with good working conditions. Since human being is the main key factor of the organization, managers should always be encouraged to seek for new opportunities for the company growth.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Human Relations Approach
    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human Relations Approach

    The human relations (HR) approach identifies that the workforce may not all be interested in money as a main motivator but appreciation and job satisfaction is just as if not more important than financial. As highlighted in Herzberg’s research the salary would merely be a “launch pad” for the motivation of the employee, with recognition and achievement being a main factor for motivation. The HR approach also supports that idea that employee and employer relationships should be formal as well as informal. Under the scientific and classical approaches to management the employees will very much feel like cattle in the sense that all the managers would be concerned with is profitability and productivity. The workers would be left unappreciated, depressed and probably bored with their jobs. Therefore through the failure of the classical approach the HR approach came about.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Human Relations Movement
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Human Relations Movement

    In the first twenty-five years of 20th century owners and managers assumed that people came to work primarily because of economic needs which led to the development of classical management supported by Taylor and then to the scientific management of Fayol. However, by the 1930s, it has become a certainty, on the basis of research, that people have other needs primarily related not to financial fulfillment but to personal involvement. Since then, there were a lot of theorists that tried to explain what was that triggered and sustained human behaviour. As a result, the research of these “behavioural scientists” (kreitner 1999) became to what today is called the human relations movement. This study will be demonstrating the need for human relations movement and also if it has completely replaced classical and scientific management. (131)…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics