American territorial expansion was rejected by many groups of people for various reasons and Native Americans were no different. Native Americans resisted American territorial expansion in several ways. The following essay will not only consist of reasons for Native American resistance but also provide proof from several primary sources. These sources include Tecumseh’s Appeal to the Osages, where Tecumseh tries to unite dozens of Indian tribes against the United States expansion efforts, Black Hawk’s Encroachment by White Settlers, where Black Hawk, a Sac Indian war chief, conveys his life story to try and justify his actions in the Black Hawk war against the American settlers, and an Encounter between Omaha Hunters and White Squatters in Iowa, where a hostile encounter between Omaha Hunters and White Squatters was the result of dramatically different conceptions of landownership amongst them.
Tecumseh, a Shawnee diplomat and warrior, saw his homeland being invaded by white settlers and believed that only a pan-Indian confederacy could defeat the encroaching United States (Greenburg, pg. 57). To make this idea a reality, Tecumseh rode to dozens of different Indian villages pleading them to join the efforts against American territorial expansion and urging them to fight to reclaim their land. Tecumseh advised, “nothing will pacify [the white men] but the destruction of all the red men,” and that white men “wish to kill us, or drive us back, as they would wolves and panthers…the white men are not friends to the Indians” (Greenburg, pg. 58). “If you do not unite with us, they will first destroy us, and then you will fall an easy prey to them,” he told each tribe. He warned each tribe that they alone could not hold off the white man, “we must be united…we must fight each other’s battles” (Greenburg, pg. 59) Despite Tecumseh’s valiant efforts to unify Indian peoples against American expansion, it did not stop the United States from removing Indians from different parts of Indian territory. The United States government was sending commissioners to different tribes to have them sign peace treaties, consenting tribes to give up their land to white settlers.
Black Hawk, a Sac war chief, gave his testimony to justify his actions in the Black Hawk war; a war where Sac and Fox Indians tried to reclaim land they felt had been taken unfairly by one of these United States treaties. He detailed that if the white man would have explained that signing the treaty would result in giving away his village, he would have never signed it (Greenburg 64). He went on to give occurrences where he and his tribe were mistreated by white men after the treaty was signed, and eventually white men started moving into his village claiming the tribes land and crops as their own. “I received information that three families of whites had arrived at our village and destroyed some of our lodges, and were making fences and dividing our corn-fields for their own use,” Black Hawk stated in his testimony (Greenburg pg. 66). As white men moved west, settling on land to which they had no legal title also became a foundation for conflict between whites and Indians. It is yet another example of how Indians resisted America’s territorial expansion.
An encounter recorded between Omaha Hunters and white squatters in Iowa is a prime example of this resistance. In the account, the Omaha warrior stated that while on a hunting trip, through land they claimed as their own, they ran into a white settlement. At first the white men were inviting, but turned hostile towards the hunting tribe once different beliefs of whose land they were hunting on was. “I am unwilling for you to wander over this land…this land is mine,” said the white men (Greenburg pg. 75) The Omaha hunters were appalled at the white man’s belief that the land was theirs. Not only was the land legally neither the white man’s nor part of the United States, the Omaha’s were using it as their hunting grounds; yet the white squatters believed it theirs (Greenburg pg. 74). This is proof that whites and Indians had dramatically different conceptions of landownership, and yet another occurrence of Indians resisting America’s expansion westward.
In conclusion, it has been proved that Native Americans where very resistant to the United States efforts of westward expansion. Tecumseh’s Appeal to the Osages (document 9) where Tecumseh made attempts to unite dozens of Indian tribes against the invading Americans, Black Hawk’s Encroachment by White Settlers (document 11) where Black Hawk gave his testimony to justify his actions in the Black Hawk war against American settlers in his village, and an Encounter between Omaha Hunters and White Squatters in Iowa (document 15) where a group of Omaha Hunters and a group of White Settlers, outside of the land the United States legally owned, came into hostile conflict of who owned the land, provide three different accounts of proof that American Indians resisted American territorial expansion in several ways.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Native American Indians inhabited the land of America long before the colonist arrived. After the colonist’s arrival, tension between them and the Native American Indians eventually led to an outbreak of war in which innumerable Indians and colonists perished. The Americans would not allow Tecumseh, “Shooting Star” and the Shawnee to remain on their own land (Wikipedia 1). Tecumseh, a Native American Indian, wanted nothing more than to retain the Shawnee land, continue living their way of life and have peace.…
- 674 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
"In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…
- 3003 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
All through the historical backdrop of the New World, there has been strife between indigenous populaces and approaching pioneers that usurp the land and assets. The uncovered histories and ficticious belief surrounding the Trail of Tears and the victory of the Incas and other local societies reminds us as readers that genocide and ethnic purifying leaves a sign of an awesome misfortune on American…
- 65 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
When English colonists first arrived to the New World, the Native American Indians were curious yet kind to these “white men”. However, as time passed the colonists’ hunger for more land grew stronger. They began to take advantage of the Indians by signing treaties that were not completely understood by the natives. Consequently, a brave Indian took upon the initiative to protect their properties. Tecumseh, leader of the Shawnee, began his quest to put a stop to American greed by uniting the molested tribes to defend their lands.…
- 126 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
From the time that the Spanish reached the New World in 1492, European powers, and later on American, consistently tried to quash the native people, one way or another. Throughout the 1800s, and especially during the Gilded Age, the federal government’s attempts to confine the Native Americans to certain areas were largely ineffective. This was the case because the Plains Indians, along with other tribes, rejected the idea of formal authority and defined territory. This caused friction between the Natives and the government, leading to what would later on be known as the Plains Wars. Ultimately, the Plains Indians were defeated, due to the federal government’s willingness to deploy military force, the settlement of Indian lands by homesteaders and railroads, and especially the destruction of the buffalo upon which the Indian way of life depended.…
- 588 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It is however surprising, when you know and understand the treatment of the Native Americans by the government of the United States, to recognize that both the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the United States contain clauses that recognize Indian peoples as foreign powers and as such the dealing of these nations must adhere to policies put forth in both (Jaimes, p141). Following these influential documents, with yet another powerful…
- 1170 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
For native American Indians, this new opportunity for settlers proved even more costly, almost the entire culture was destroyed by either disease, famine, or murder. Many Natives believe that this culture war has never ended, even in today’s modern society. As History showed us, once these settlers colonized the Eastern portion of the New World, the Native were either killed, or had to move to the west, eventually living in their own settlements, known today as “Tribal Reservations”. Even today we as American’s believe that since we protect these Native American lands we were justified in our historical and in our own way oppressive actions.…
- 522 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the mind of the Creeks, the battle was more than just a fight for survival; it was a struggle to tenaciously hold on to traditions and culture which the Creeks felt to be under attack by American colonists. As John Walton Caughey mentions in McGillivray of the Creeks, “Our lands are our life and breath, if we part with them, we part with our blood. We must fight for them.”1 This statement seemed to be a common theme among the Upper Creeks. American colonists and the government hoped the Creeks could be assimilated in a peaceful manner into American society through negotiations and financial enticements: “Westward expansion could then proceed in an orderly way, with Indian population retreating before the advancing American frontier or assimilating with American society.”2 The mainstay of…
- 2541 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
With Antebellum America followed a desire for Manifest Destiny. The people soon wanted to own all of the land in the country and began moving west. While this westward movement seemed euphoric for the Americans, advertised nearly as a getaway from the already crowded east, such a feeling did not exist for the Indians. Manifest Destiny was an aggressive imperialism pursued at the expense of others due to the facts that it was made out to be an expansion prearranged by Heaven when it simply was the craving of more land, it took the Indians only home that was promised to them by a previous treaty, and when the Manifest Destiny movement was created, it entitled the American people ownership of the Indian’s themselves.…
- 623 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Manifest Destiny still exists, however in a more modernized form. In the 1800’s the main goal for everyone was to spread Americanization and be found everywhere. Although we still want America to expand, our reasons differ than the past. Curently are goal seems to be expanding our economic domination. Examples of this include spreading our economic domination in Afghanistan and Iraq.…
- 61 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
With the Confederation almost complete, forwarded Shawnee decision to send Tecumseh, a young renowned warrior and a strong speaker ‘to traverse the Miscopy Valley, seeking to revive Neolin’s pan Indian alliance of the 1760s. Feeling that the only alternative to westward expansion was extermination, as one chief asked “Where are the Narragansett, the Mohican, the Pocanet, and other powerful tribes of our people? ‘They have vanished before the avarice {greed) and oppression of the white man, as snow before the sun.’ Indians, he proclaimed, must recognize that they were a single people and equal right in the land. He repudiated, “chiefs who had sold land to the federal government were no better than their white rivals.”…
- 446 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Land represents a quintessential issue between Native Americans and Europeans. This has been true since Columbus’ discovery and the era of Spanish exploration, invasion, and settlement. During the latter periods of Native American history we observe how English colonization and then the birth and growth of the United States affects the Indian Nations. During this period we mark how two divergent societies value land differently and the disparities resulting in conflict and Indian subjugation.…
- 840 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
During the 19th century, the United States had began to expand it’s territory towards the western frontier. This era of U.S. history was dominated by the belief in manifest destiny – the idea that the United States was destined to expand to the west coast, and was justified in doing so (History.com Staff, 2010). However, settlers heading west faced many hindrances to their grand plans along their way, including the Native Americans, who had been living on the land for centuries before western expansion began. Thus began the long balancing act between manifest destiny and the rights of Native Americans. This attempt at balance lead to many unavoidable interactions between the white settlers and the natives, including trade and the attempted relocation and assimilation of the natives.…
- 595 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
During the early to mid-1800s, the relationship between Americans and Native Americans became severely strained. Many Americans believed the western land was completely their own through the devastating concept of manifest destiny. Among the people carefully observing this issue were not just people who were supportive of forcefully taking Indian land, but also those who were opposed to it. This clashing conflict between the two groups intensified as their differences developed. Americans believed the Indians absolutely could not become assimilated and civilized instead than savage. Native Americans would no longer be idle and acquiesce to the treaties forced upon them, nor would they meekly accept the abuse. A notable supporter of Indian Removal…
- 1123 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
How is the idea of Manifest Destiny represented in what occurred as the Northwest Territory was established?It was represented Anglo-Saxon Americans and to extend its influence beyond its continental boundaries into the Pacific and Caribbean basins. What occurred as the Northwest Territory was established was to expand the concept were taken up by those desiring to secure Oregon Territory, California, Mexican land in the Southwest, and, in the 1850s, Cuba. This is the idea of Manifest destiny represented in what occurred as Northwest Territory was…
- 84 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays