Preview

Marbury v. Madison Case Brief (includes reflection)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
776 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marbury v. Madison Case Brief (includes reflection)
Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)FactsMarbury was commissioned to serve as a judge by former president John Adam. The former Secretary of State and the present Chief Justice John Marshall failed to deliver the commission before President Thomas Jefferson started his term. The current Secretary of State, James Madison, under Jeffersons orders, did not deliver the commission. Marbury applied for a writ of mandamus to force Madison to deliver said commission. HoldingMarburys application for a writ of mandamus was rejected because the Judiciary Act of 1789, the law on which his application was based, was found by the Marshall Court to be unconstitutional.

ReasoningThe holding was derived from several reasons.

The court first contemplated whether Marbury has a right to the commission that he wants delivered to him. The Marshall Court established that, since his commission is for a legal position, and not for a political one, the Executive branch does not have the power to terminate it without violating his vested right to the position. As his right has indeed been violated, the court decided that the laws of the United States and judicial system need to provide him a solution it is the duty of the judicial branch to do so. The court also states that since an officer has indeed infringed up on the right of an individual, a mandamus is a valid remedy to consider.

However, the Marshall Court found that the Act on which this request is based on, Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, is in conflict with Article 3, Section 2 of the US Constitution. Section 13 increased the Supreme Courts power, giving it the right to issue writs of mandamus in appellate and original cases, whereas the Constitution stated that the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction only for cases affected ministers, ambassadors, and consuls. Section 13 does indeed justify the granting of a writ, but Article3 Section 2 does not, as Marbury does not belong to any of the groups mentioned

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Decision: The Supreme Court denied Marbury’s writ of mandamus and he was denied the commissions.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Marbury V. US

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marbury was an intended recipient of on appointment as justice of the peace. When Marbury found out he would not be receiving the appointment he applied directly to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus (”an order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion. (See, e.g. Cheney v. United States Dist. Court for D.C. (03-475) 542 U.S. 367 (2004) 334…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison:(1803) Judicial review In 1801, Justice William Marbury was to have received a commission from President Adams, but Secretary of State James Madison refused to issue the commission. Chief Justice Marshall stated that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was the basis for Marbury's claim, conflicted with Article III of the Constitution. Marbury did not receive the commission. This case determined that the Supreme Court and not the states would have the ultimate word on whether an issue was in violation of the Constitution. The ruling, based on judicial review, made the Judicial Branch equal to the other two branches of government.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madison Case

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The law stated that Marbury does have the right to the commission and it became effective when it was signed by President Adams. It was also stated that the law against Marbury a remedy because one of the duties provided by the government is to provide affordable protection. The Supreme Court also has the authority to review acts of congress and up to them to determine whether they are unconstitutional and therefore void. The congress also cannot expand the slope of the supreme courts. Original jurisdiction beyond what is specified in article III of the constitution. . Lastly the Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction to issue units of…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1803, a single case managed to change how America's government would be run forever. In John Adams' last few days as president, he appointed a small group of Federalists into power. When Thomas Jefferson was elected into office, and he told James Madison to not bring the commissions to an appointed “midnight judge” named William Marbury. This gave the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Marshall, a great opportunity to spread his Federalist influence deeper into the American government. When Marbury found out that his commission was being held back by Madison, he sued for its delivery.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. John Marshall means in his statement that the constitution does not allow the judiciary branch to rule in such a way that Marbury would like. Although Marbury did lose his job, the context in which he earned his job was unconstitutional. Marshall's statement is referring to the inability of the judiciary branch to compensate Marbury for a job which was given in an unconstitutional way.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written by Chief Justice John Marshall, the majority ruled that while Marbury was entitled to receive his commission and that courts are able to grant remedies, the Supreme Court did not have the right to grant the plaintiff his legal order. The reasoning behind this was that Marbury’s request was based on a law passed by Congress that the Court deemed unconstitutional (Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789). The Court then stated that when the Constitution and the law conflict, it is the Supreme Court’s duty to uphold the law of the land and rule in unity with the Constitution.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States under Article III of the Constitution. The decision helped define the boundary between the constitutionally separate executive and judicial branches of the American form of…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The third question stated, “Is he entitled to the remedy for which he applies?” However, Madison answer was complicatedly given, and concluded that it was a suitable remedy. The conclusion to the case was that a writ of mandamus would not be issued, and he would not receive his commission after all and provided the Judicial Act of 1789 which still ruled the case unconstitutional. The Supreme Court decides which laws relate to the conclusion, and Marshall established the precedent, which now accepts the principle of Judicial rule ever…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury v. Madison (1803) changed the role of the Supreme Court forever. The case started as a conflict of delivering court commissions, but ended as a precedent for the Supreme Court. During the case Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789—authorizing the Supreme Court to issue writs to government officials—was unconstitutional. This began the practice declaring laws that…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appointing the men to be Justices of the Piece was with in Adams constitutional rights as president. John Marshall says “ The constitution is either a superior paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts and, like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it. If the former part of the alternative be true, then…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many jurisdictions the judicial branch has the power to change laws through the process of judicial review. The term “judiciary is also used to refer collectively to the personnel, such as judges, magistrates and other adjudicators, who form the core of a judiciary (sometimes referred to as a “bench”), as well as the staffs who keep the system running smoothly. In 1803, Marbury vs Madison case reviewed in the Supreme Court confirmed the legal principle of judicial review demonstrating the ability of the Supreme Court to limit Congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional in the new nation.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Act of 1789 gave Congress the act of granting the Supreme Court the right to issue writs of mandamus. Article III of the Constitution grants the Supreme Court the authority to review acts of Congress to validate whether they are unconstitutional or not and therefore void. Article III of the Constitution also states "the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be a party. In all other cases, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction." The Supreme Court held that they had the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether or not they were constitutional and void those that were not, but that Congress did not have the right to expand the scope of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction beyond what was specified in the Constitution. The Supreme Court also held that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional and therefore void.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His tenor in the court lasted from 1801 to shortly before his death in 1835 and was responsible, largely, for how the Supreme Court functions and its role as the guardian of the Constitution. There were several factors of Marshall’s leadership that helped gain the strength of the judicial branch including seeking out advice from Associate Judges and his ability to accept and encourage the ideas of newcomers but the solidification of the Courts responsibility of judicial review along with Chief Justice Marshall’s concept of unitary opinions helped to develop the overall strength and importance of the Supreme Court. (Johnson, 1998, p. 7) Marbury v. Madison was the landmark decision that reinforced their…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Importance of Madison v. Marbury Judicial review is a power within the federal government, which allows the Supreme Court to declare the acts of the executive branch and legislative branch unconstitutional. Through the Supreme Court's decision regarding the case of Marbury v. Madison, the doctrine of judicial review was declared (Haas). This act further established the efficiency of the checks and balances system between the branches of the government by extending the judicial branches legislative and executive power. The final decision of Madison vs. Marbury further establishes its importance through its appearance in court cases which followed the Supreme Court's decision after 1803, such as: Brown v. Board of education, Gideon v. Wainwright,…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays