Maria Stager's Presentation Outline
PRESENTATION STYLE
1. Was this presentation well organized?
-Yes, both presentations were well organized.
2. Were the slides used appropriate for the presentation?
-Yes, the slides used were all appropriate in both presentation the tables, graphs and also pictures were all correlated with what they were talking about.
3. Address the graphical qualities of the slides/overheads (For example, were the fonts large enough? Were figures, tables and photographs easy to see and comprehend?)
-The figures and tables were all simple and easy to comprehend, the font size for both presentations were large enough to read too.
4. How might the quality of the slides be improved?
-I think the quality of the slides in both presentations were good, but some slides there were too much information’s in them I was too busy reading it and didn’t pay attention to what they were talking about. But maybe next time less information on slides.
5. Did the presenter speak clearly and at an appropriate pace? …show more content…
Was there too much or too little introduction/overview, experimental detail/data and interpretation presented? Maria Stager
- I think her presentation was good the only problem that I didn’t like about it she didn’t really talk about the evolution and ecological behavioral of Dark-eyed Juncos she just brush it off. But overall at this preliminary results stage the information that was presented were adequate. Cole Wolf
-The introduction was really brief ,so far the only results that he presented was the different percentage of body fat in 2 population of deer-mice one in New Mexico and the other one from Nebraska. But half of his talk was talking about what he was going to do over the summer and what he expects he find. I think overall the presentation was good and information provided were adequate since this was their first stage of conducting his study.
3. Were the results discussed adequately (i.e. at an appropriate level) for the nature of the
1. Was this presentation well organized?
-Yes, both presentations were well organized.
2. Were the slides used appropriate for the presentation?
-Yes, the slides used were all appropriate in both presentation the tables, graphs and also pictures were all correlated with what they were talking about.
3. Address the graphical qualities of the slides/overheads (For example, were the fonts large enough? Were figures, tables and photographs easy to see and comprehend?)
-The figures and tables were all simple and easy to comprehend, the font size for both presentations were large enough to read too.
4. How might the quality of the slides be improved?
-I think the quality of the slides in both presentations were good, but some slides there were too much information’s in them I was too busy reading it and didn’t pay attention to what they were talking about. But maybe next time less information on slides.
5. Did the presenter speak clearly and at an appropriate pace? …show more content…
Was there too much or too little introduction/overview, experimental detail/data and interpretation presented? Maria Stager
- I think her presentation was good the only problem that I didn’t like about it she didn’t really talk about the evolution and ecological behavioral of Dark-eyed Juncos she just brush it off. But overall at this preliminary results stage the information that was presented were adequate. Cole Wolf
-The introduction was really brief ,so far the only results that he presented was the different percentage of body fat in 2 population of deer-mice one in New Mexico and the other one from Nebraska. But half of his talk was talking about what he was going to do over the summer and what he expects he find. I think overall the presentation was good and information provided were adequate since this was their first stage of conducting his study.
3. Were the results discussed adequately (i.e. at an appropriate level) for the nature of the