Preview

Mary Anne Warren Personhood Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1218 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mary Anne Warren Personhood Analysis
Mary Anne Warren argued that fetus is a human being but not a person, which only persons have full moral rights. What is human being? What is person? Is it right for a woman to carry out abortion? In this essay, we will pinpoint at commenting her criteria on personhood.

It is useful to look beyond for us to decide whether other beings like aliens are a person or not. If we want to be sure of behaving morally towards these beings, we have to somehow decide whether they are people, and hence have full moral rights, or whether they are the sort of things which he need not feel guilty about treating them only as a mean. How should we make this decision? Warren suggested that the traits which are most central to the concept of personhood,
…show more content…
According Warren’s view, the following five criteria are the most central senses. First, consciousness is the state of understanding and realization. Consciousness means of objects and events external and/ or internal to the being, and in particular the capacity to feel pain. Reasoning means the developed capacity to solve new and relatively complex problems. The second criterion is reasoning, which refers to the developed capacity to solve new and relatively complex problems or challenges. Reasoning is a way which thinking comes from one idea to a related idea. It is the mean by which rational beings understand themselves to think about cause and effect, and what is good or bad. Third, it is the self-motivated activity. Self-motivated activity is relatively independence of either genetic or direct external control, in order words, a person's ability and willingness to work without being told what to do. The forth criteria is the capacity to communicate. The communication can be by whatever means with messages of an indefinite variety of type. Not just with an indefinite number of possible contents, but also on indefinitely many possible topics. The communication process is complete once when the receiver has understood the message of the sender. Finally, it is the presence of individual or racial self-concepts self-awareness either. It is the totality of your thoughts and feelings with reference to yourself as an …show more content…
However, she does not state which traits are crucial for the reward of personhood. Rather than looking for a definite definition for personhood, but a necessary condition. On the extreme, I proposed avoiding discussing personhood to solve the problem of definite personhood like Judith Thomson does not attempt to do this.

To sum up, in Mary Anne Warren's view on abortion that fetus is a human being but not a person and only persons have full moral rights. In other words, Warren believes that killing non-persons are just, thus she thinks it is nothing wrong for pregnant women to carry out abortion under any situations. However, her five senses to entitle a person cannot be applied justly under certain conditions including human in comma, infants, mentally challenged people, self-aware robots or other absurd cases. Therefore, we do not agree with Warren’s view on abortion. She should have given satisfactory responses to these cases in order to achieve strong and believable argument on ‘it is nothing wrong to for pregnant women to conduct abortion’ to the general

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The question between whether abortion is morally right or wrong has been talked about for years and no common ground has been made. Judith Thomson, a believer in Pro-choice, argues that abortion is not wrong because the mother should have a choice of what happens to her body. In response to this, Donald Marquis who is against abortion believes every fetus is a human with a right to have a future like ours. Each Ethicist gives examples and theories as to why abortion is wrong or right. In this essay, I will attempt to show that abortion is okay in some cases, and Donald Marquis’s views and arguments are broad and incorrect.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mary Anne Warren Thesis

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mary Anne Warren in the chapter “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion and Postscript on Infanticide” discusses her views on pro-abortion. Warren explains how a fetus has not reached enough development to be considered a person. In order for a being to be considered a person they must have a list of five traits. The first is “consciousness”, specifically the facility to feel emotions externally and internally, such as pain. The second is “reasoning”, the capability to finding solutions to any difficult insistences, or situations. “Self-motivated activity” is the third trait, it consists of “activity which is relatively independent of either genetic or direct external control” (pp). The fourth trait is communication, “by whatever means, messages with an indefinite variety of types, that is, not just with an indefinite number of possible contents, but on indefinitely many possible topics” (pp). The final trait is “self-awareness and self-concepts” (pp). These five traits are what ultimately identifies humanity or personhood, and a fetus does not apply to these descriptions, therefor, a fetus is not considered a person – rather the mother of the fetus is, she has the right to decide whether to terminate the fetus or not. “A pregnant…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rebecca Skloot’s The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks raises the question of what Personhood is but leaves the answer up to the audience, for there is no precise explanation to define the quality of being an individual person. However, several different opinions on what constitutes a person can help establish an answer to the question of personhood. In chapter 33, The Hospital for the Negro Insane, the discovery of what happened to Elsie is particularly affecting; Skloot writes, “based on the number of patients listed in the pneumoencephalography study…it most likely included every epileptic child in the hospital, including Elsie. The same is likely true for at…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mary Warren

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Crucible is a play about the Salem witch trials and all the people involved with the deaths and he people that actually died. The play explains the trigger to thee trials and the events that lead to the first and last people that were hanged. Mary Warren, a character in the play, was the cause of a lot of the deaths in the play, even though in was pretty much all a mistake. The Crucible really makes you thing about how even innocent people are the most guilty.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of abortion is a highly controversial issue in today's society, and various views are held concerning the morality of the procedure. Some people feel that abortion is simply cold-blooded murder, because it is their opinion that a 'foetus' is a human being from the moment of conception. However, others would argue that a foetus is merely insubstantial matter, dependant entirely on its mother's body for survival, with no real life of its own. It is for this reason that pro-abortionists support the woman's choice to undergo abortion. After all, why should something so small and insignificant, which is not yet human, be entitled to the same rights and privileges a real human has"…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people believe that abortions should be legal because women should have the right to choose whether or not they want to bring a baby into the world. They believe a woman should have property rights which include the body and the fetus. They also believe a woman should have privacy rights which means the state should not interfere with private matters. These people are called pro choice. At the same time many people are anti-abortion because they believe “Life is present from the moment of conception” (526). In Don Marquis’s essay, “Why Abortion is Immoral” he takes the position that abortion is “morally unjustified” (525). The purpose of the essay is to go against the belief that “The anti-abortion position is either a symptom of irrational religious dogma or a conclusion generated by seriously confused philosophical argument” (525). Abortions should be illegal because they are morally wrong except, in cases beyond our control.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ultimately, she argues that the fetus are not human beings therefore, we should not worry about if we should be able to kill them. She states that the fetus is genetically human, but she claims that research has shown that a fetus is not morally a human. Genetically human is known as a member of the homo sapiens species and being morally human can be summed up by saying one that gives us traits that make us have moral rights. She compiles a list of attributes that make a human morally human: consciousness, reason, self-motivated activity, communication, and self-awareness (not necessarily all of them). She concludes that because the fetus is not morally a human until around the third trimester, so the fetus is not a human until that point, which makes an abortion acceptable any time before the third trimester, or around twenty or so weeks. However, she doesn’t agree with allowing the individual to have an abortion done after reaching the state where the fetus is morally…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Overview of the Argument There is many arguments against abortion. Part of them argue that the fetus is a person at the moment of conception. To that Thomson asks the question: At what point is conception? “Before this point the thing is not a person, after this point it is a person.”…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jonathan Glover, in his article Matters of Life and Death casts dispersions on both pro-abortion and anti-abortion debates citing them as too knee-jerk emotional reactions diminishing the inherent complexity of the other side (1. Glover, CC2006, p. 0110). Glover comprehensively addresses the key points of both sides of the abortion debate and evaluates their inherent virtues, especially for those who hold these opinions, then methodically points out its flaws. Ultimately, Glover comes to the conclusion that though a fetus is a human at the moment of conception, the right to abort lies with the mother and her own self-determination.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mary Anne Warren argues the position that abortion is morally permissible because the fetus is not a person therefore has no rights therefore not immoral to be killed. I shall argue that Warren’s position is invalid since her argument “appears to justify not only abortion, but infanticide as well.”…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When we are discussing the argument of abortion the idea of personhood is raised. Personhood is the status of being a person; it is the quality or condition of being an individual person. Personhood might be claimed when looking at the…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Warren states that the anti-abortionist must show that the fetus is a person in the full moral sense, not just in a genetic sense. The moral community, she believes, consists of all and only people, rather than merely human beings. She finds a distinction between a human being (someone genetically human) and a person (someone we have included in our moral community). She gives the example of finding life forms on another planet, and questions how humanity would decide if they should be treated as persons, or as potential sources of food. The determining factors she decides on are five traits of personhood: consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, the capacity to communicate, and self-awareness.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to boldily autonomy and the clear distinction between a fetus and a rational, self-aware person, abortion is morally permissible practically whenever the mother chooses it, given it is done humanely. Most people would agree that in cases where the woman did not choose pregnancy, like rape, abortion should be morally permissible due to bodily autonomy and the immorality of asking someone to undergo psychological and physical trauma due to something beyond their control. This is supported by the Famous Violinist argument which explains that women, especially those who are pregnant due to rape, are not morally obligated to endure this immense sacrifice, even if it would be nice to do so (Singer, 1975, p.113-114). Whilst Thomson’s argument has fallen under criticism based on utilitarianism, these arguments are countered by Singer’s deconstruction of the Conservative Argument and its flawed perception that human life is inherently special, which demonstrates the moral permissibility of most abortions. The Conservative Argument’s premise that a fetus is an innocent human can mean two things: either the fetus is a person that has self-awareness and rational thought or a fetus is a member of the human species (Singer, 1975, p.117).…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fetus Rights

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Kaczor, Christopher Robert.The Ethics of Abortion: Women 's Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice. New York: Routledge, 2011. Print.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays