Preview

Mathematics and Certainty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5114 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mathematics and Certainty
Topic 1- Mathematics and Certainty
Having said something about the nature of formal systems, we must now look in more detail at the nature of mathematical certainty. To do this, let us begin by making two distinctions. The first concerns the nature of propositions. An analytic proposition is one that is true by definition. A synthetic proposition is any proposition that is not analytic. So we can say that every proposition is either analytic or synthetic.
The second distinction concerns how we come to know that a proposition is true.
A proposition is said to be knowable a priori if it can be known to be true independent of experience.
It is said to be knowable a posteriori if it cannot be known to be true independent of experience.

As with the analytic—synthetic distinction, we can say that every true proposition can be known either a priori or a posteriori. Combining the two pairs of distinctions, we can generate the following matrix:

Nature of Proposition

Analytic
Synthetic
How is it knowable?
A Priori
1
4 ?

A Posteriori
2 x
3

Now let us try to explain what might fit into each of the four boxes:
Box 1: This concerns propositions that are true by definition and can be known independent of experience.
Does anything go in this box? Yes!
We can put all definitions in this box because they can all be known to be true independent of experience.
For example take Bolivian bachelors. I have never been to Bolivia and I know nothing about the profile of the average Bolivian bachelor, but I can say with complete confidence that every Bolivian bachelor is unmarried.
Apart from knowledge of the English language, I do not need any experience of the world to verify the truth of this proposition.
It might, however, be described as a trivial truth. If you are told that all Bolivian bachelors are unmarried, you have learned nothing new about the world.

Box 2: For a proposition to go in box 2, it would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab 204 Quiz

    • 2478 Words
    • 10 Pages

    You follow certain step’s to access the supplementary readings for a course when u sing your organizations library management system. These steps that you follow are examples of the _________ components of an information system.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, Dew and Foreman discuss some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then discuss the nature of knowledge itself. They consider questions such as, “What do we mean when we say we know something?” “What exactly is knowledge?…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, we begin by examining the question “What do we mean when we say we know something?” What exactly is knowledge? We will begin with a presentation that introduces the traditional definition of knowledge. Wood then discusses some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then presents an approach to epistemology that focuses on obtaining the intellectual virtues, a point we will elaborate on in the next lesson.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phi1101 Study Notes

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * The fact that we believe this statement does not make it true / false…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Epistemology Phil/201 Quiz

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A group of theories of justification which holds that one does need to have access to evidence to be justified or warranted about at least some beliefs; I may not know why I know, but I can still reasonably say I know.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Structure Lab

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. When I am making an educated guess about observations, I am forming a hypothesis.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gilbert Gladwell Essay

    • 864 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Likewise, “ When we expose ourselves to favorable facts… we are generally no more aware…”…

    • 864 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume argues that all a priori knowledge is of relations of ideas, and so analytic. All knowledge of synthetic propositions, matters of fact, is a posteriori. It depends either on present experience or causal…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    test submission

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts that are known by a large number of people and that do not have to be cited are called ‘common knowledge’?…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    say: We know it when we see it. But unless we attempt a definition of some sort, we risk…

    • 4208 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Priori: Knowledge that has not been supported by an experience or an actual fact.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant Final

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For Kant, it is of the greatest importance that one distinguishes a priori from a posteriori judgments, as well as synthetic from analytic judgments. A priori judgments involve absolute necessity and strict universality, i.e. they are valid without variation for all cognizant beings. A posteriori judgments, on the other hand, are empirical and as such are necessarily synthetic. In the case of synthetic claims, the predicate is not contained in the subject, and are therefore ampliative and augment our knowledge. For example, the claim “All bodies have weight” is synthetic a posteriori because the concept of weight is not contained within the concept of body. Analytic claims, on the other hand, are such that the predicate is contained in the subject. Such claims may be called “classifying”; for instance, “all triangles have 3 sides” is an a priori analytic claim, because the concept of “having 3 sides” is contained within the subject of triangle. I am not building upon my knowledge of triangles when I consider such a statement. Analytic judgments are shown to be true directly through the principle of non-contradiction. All a posteriori judgments are synthetic, since it would not make sense to base analytic judgments on our experiences, since their truth value is determined by the meaning or classification of the terms. However, a priori claims may be either synthetic or analytic. An example of a synthetic a priori judgment is any mathematical equation, e.g. “7+5=12.” Though this is not readily obvious, since many believe such judgments to be analytic and that their validity is determined by the law of non-contradiction. Kant, however, shows us that such claims are in fact synthetic, because it is not a part of the concept of the summation of 7 and 5 to equal the distinct number 12. Only when we put instances of 7 and 5 together, paired with our intuition, will we discover that 12 is in fact their…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Circle

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page

    2. “All that happens must be known—true or not?” And is all-seeing really all-knowing? (70)…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Verification Principle

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout the years, science has been a very productive practice. From explaining why and how things happen to sending people to the moon. Not only do we see its benefits every day, but also new discoveries are being made constantly. Science has proven its success. By using the scientific method and critical thinking, a wide range of things have been discovered. One cannot say the same for philosophy. Many of the questions that were asked by the very first philosophers are still being contemplated and debated over today. Some philosophers thought that in order to make philosophy as successful as science that they would need to adopt a method such as the scientific method. Thus, the Verification Principle came to be.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    interesting, not just for the fact that there is a supposition that hitherto knowledge of…

    • 9254 Words
    • 42 Pages
    Good Essays