Maximizing Welfare Essay
Answer: The first approach Sandel presents is Maximizing Welfare. “Much contemporary political debate is about how to promote prosperity, or improve our standard of living, or spur economic growth.” Maximizing welfare is individualistic; most people are wired to want what is best for them- and sometimes others because they believe “prosperity makes us better off than we would otherwise be”. An example of poor moral judgment in reference to maximizing welfare is the treatment of armed forces veterans and the way they are treated when they come home from fighting for our country. Many veterans are left homeless and without a job. The help that veterans are receiving barley scratches the surface of what our country are do. People are so caught
…show more content…
People always sway the limitations of freedom for personal gain. “The idea that justice means respecting freedom and individual rights” has been tossed about in our courts and communities tirelessly. Part of the basis of the United States is freedom; the bill of rights lists ways in which the government must respect people’s most basic freedoms. Sandel talks about two different camps, the laissez-faire camp and the fairness camp, each arguing for freedoms but in their own way. The laissez-faire camp doesn’t believe in government or community policies, but in each person’s voluntary choices. However, the fairness camp believes “justice requires policies that remedy social and economic disadvantages” which in turn will give everyone a shot. An example of moral judgment and freedom is the first amendment in the Bill of Rights. Everyone is granted the freedom to talk about whatever they please, whether it upsets other or not. In certain situations although a right some things should not be said and knowing that difference takes moral judgment. Like in an airport you have the freedom to shout bomb, but that lack in judgment and social awareness will end you up getting strip searched, questioned, researched, and that little word may end cause you to miss your
People always sway the limitations of freedom for personal gain. “The idea that justice means respecting freedom and individual rights” has been tossed about in our courts and communities tirelessly. Part of the basis of the United States is freedom; the bill of rights lists ways in which the government must respect people’s most basic freedoms. Sandel talks about two different camps, the laissez-faire camp and the fairness camp, each arguing for freedoms but in their own way. The laissez-faire camp doesn’t believe in government or community policies, but in each person’s voluntary choices. However, the fairness camp believes “justice requires policies that remedy social and economic disadvantages” which in turn will give everyone a shot. An example of moral judgment and freedom is the first amendment in the Bill of Rights. Everyone is granted the freedom to talk about whatever they please, whether it upsets other or not. In certain situations although a right some things should not be said and knowing that difference takes moral judgment. Like in an airport you have the freedom to shout bomb, but that lack in judgment and social awareness will end you up getting strip searched, questioned, researched, and that little word may end cause you to miss your