Preview

Medical Testing on Animals

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
835 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Medical Testing on Animals
Is Necessary Medical Testing on Animals?

Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook’s “The Evil Right of Animals” first appeared in May 19, 2001. In this essay Epstein and Brook aim to convince their readers that medical testing on animals is necessary. “Scientist are close than ever to finding cures for AIDS, cancer, and other deadly illness. But more research and testing are needed and much of it must be done on animals.” (Epstein and Brook qtd.). Pathos, specific evidence, and logical thoughts are techniques Epstein and Brook skillfully use to create a strong, convincing essay.
Epstein and Brook begin their essay by use of pathos describing “Scientist are close than ever to finding cures for AIDS, cancer, and other deadly illness.”(Epstein and Brook qtd.). This technique immediately captures the reader’s interest. When human emotions are involved, persuasion usually is very effective. Although, the authors are addressing to everyone, but this technique is effective because it can touch the heart of people who have lived a personal experience related to the subject. For example, people who have suffered an illness would be mostly moved and motivated to agree with the message expressed by the authors. In this case, by the selection of their words, tone and intensity Epstein and Brook succeeded in transmitting an emotional and convincing argument. Also, they discuss the violence of protesters, the effect this violence has on the companies and individuals involved in the field, and the consequences the world would face were these professionals not allowed to further their work. “-there has been a series of violent attacks on people and property linked to the company. Eleven cars belonging to Huntingdon employees have been firebombed, a senior manager had a caustic substance thrown into his eyes by a protester, and the company 's managing director was seriously beaten by masked assailants-."(Epstein and Brook qtd.). This example clearly provides support for the fact that



Cited: Epstein, Alex and Brook, Yaron. “The Evil of Animals Rights.”Ayn Rand for Individual Rights. Michael Chiavaroli & Associates. Convio. 19 May. 2001. Web. 9 Jan.2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Imagine an animal’s feeling of panic and fear as it is about to be killed by a hunter or the isolation experienced as an animal sits in a laboratory, separated from its family and natural habitat, waiting to be harmed by harsh testing methods. Imagine the frightened state of a mother or father watching their innocent baby being captured. After considering the brutality towards animals in these scenarios, take into consideration the health benefits humans receive from different parts of these animals. Imagine health risks avoided through testing on animals first instead of on humans. Does human benefit justify the harm and killing of animals? Linda Hasselstrom’s essay “The Cow Versus The Animal Rights Activist” and Tom Regan’s “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” argue this question through analysis of the reason for killing animals, the method in which they are killed, and the morality of the killing of animals.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The purpose of this text is to give a little insight as to why animal testing is important and what the companies doing this testing go through with animal activist groups. With the animal testing, possible cure for AIDS, other deadly diseases, and maybe cancer lie upon these creatures. The authors try to explain that the animal activist groups are trying their best to keep this from happening.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Evil of Animal ‘Rights’” by Alex Epstein and Yaron Brook addresses the issue of medical testing on animals. The authors describe the dangers of a world without medical testing, as well as the benefits that come of this testing. They discuss the violent nature of protesters, the effect this violence has on the companies and individuals involved in the field, and the ramifications the world would face were these professionals not allowed to further their work. Epstein and Brook strongly support medical testing on animals, however they fail to completely deliver their view due to alienation of their audience.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In her article, “A Question of Ethics”, Jane Goodall argues that animal testing research is unethical and ineffective and people should be aware that there are other alternatives that are helpful in noticing diseases as the advanced medical technologies. She questions whether it is ethical or not to use animals as test subjects for new drugs and vaccines. She asserts that scientists should avoid conducting unnecessarily experiments on animals in order not to cause suffering for them. Moreover, Goodall indicates that if animal testing is the only way available to decrease human suffering, it would be ethical for scientists to do such tests. However, if there are alternative tests available, it would be unethical for scientists to depend on animal…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, the debate of whether animals have moral rights or not has been thrown around court rooms, social media, and protests. Arguments are made defending animals and suggesting that they should be protected and recognized in human society. Medical researchers are scrutinized and harassed by these supporters for their part in animal testing and medical investigation. Scientific breakthroughs have been made, which has transformed the development of modern medicine. Lifespans have elongated and lives are being saved in every corner of the world, yet somehow, this is still debated as if it is the wrong thing to do. Research animals are pertinent tools of the medical world and humans are entitled to use them as such. As human beings with…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animals can be ferocious and wild, but they can also be gentle and tame. Some are our pets, and some are powerful forces that are to be respected and admired. It is as easy to appreciate a loyal dog as it is to be in awe of a lion in its' natural habitat. But the truth that many people either don’t know or don’t appreciate is that animals are essential to human existence and have played a vital role in improving the quality of our lives. They have been providing us with answers to our most complex medical questions for decades. Their role in finding cures for diseases, treatments for illness, and product safety is immense. First, we will examine how animal testing has benefited both man and beast. Second, I will dispel the belief that animals used in research are mistreated. Last, we will learn how the process of drug development is carried out.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in U.S. labs every year.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    `”God loved the birds and invented trees. Man loved the birds and invented cages” (Deval, Jacques). There are many things wrong about animal research, and I think that a lot of it is wrong. Animal testing is wrong because it harms animals, animals’ rights are violated in tests, it is expensive, there are better alternatives, and the results of these tests aren’t always accurate or reliable.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Persuasive Paper

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Attention Getter: Do you imagine the pet that you love being being use for test? Relevance: Although some people agree that animal testing is fine,but I strongly dislike the idea of the cruelty with the animal Credibility: According to Peta ’s fact sheet, they argue that ‘In many cases, animal studies do not just hurt animals and waste money, they kill people too.’” Thesis: Animal testing should be banned from United States. Preview: I will be discussing about animal testing and other options available. I have always felt strongly about animal rights, and cruelty to animals. Transition: Animal testing is the study, experimentation and research of any animal. Animal rights activists are opposed to using animals for medical research and experimentation because humans do not have the right to use animals. I. Animal rights Transition: Finding cures for humans and testing in animals. II. Animal testing Transition: In conclusion, A. Animal testing is not reliable and is very expensive. Animal testing is inhumane and now that there are alternatives to this, there is no excuse for anyone to still commit this act. Animal testing should be banned in America. I suggest that governments fully ban animal testing, so that the world becomes a better and safer place for both animals and humans.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Cons

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    FIX:Everyone loves animals! They are soft, loveable, and good hearted. Knowing that animals are so innocent, it is astonishing that scientists all over the world have been using animals for medical purposes.The medical purposes are mostly experiments to find cures for diseases or ailments in humans. There has been quite a bit of controversy as to why Animal Testing has to be done at all. There are so many animals out there who are used, hurt,and experimented on. However, there is another side to this picture and it is for medical research purposes. Animal testing is a way to discover information for medical purposes and it is important in finding cures . However, Medical Researching takes so much money, time and can be very unreliable therefore…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    animal testing

    • 1183 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle and Erasistratus were the first two early Greek physician-scientist performed experiments on living animals. In 1859, Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory reinforced the conception that animals could serve as models for humans in the study of biology and physiology. Animal testing plays a large important role in pharmaceutical and medical advances, but many question the mortality of such use of the animal’s life. More than 100 million aninals are used for testing every single year. Animal testing has brought a lot of positive and negative outcome and there are many different opinions regarding it.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever visited an old cemetery? Have you also read the head stones and said to yourself wow the men women and children sure did die at a young age. I know I have and I am very thankful that I am alive today instead of back in the 1800 and early 1900s. The medical breakthroughs we have made as a society are incredible. It is all due to the fact that we allow and perform testing on animals. With all these discoveries we are living longer and finding more cures to diseases.…

    • 2640 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is it wrong to experiment on animals for our own benefit? Many may disagree and believe its immoral and shouldnt be done. Science and manufacturing need animal experimentation to prevent harm to humans because it helps to develope cures for disease and to save humans from experimentation.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Approximately, more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year (Humane Society International, 2010). Animals, from the fruit fly to the mouse, are widely used in scientific research. Research is critical for the advancement of medicine, leading to increased chances of survival from diseases and improved strategies to prevent them. Without animal experiments, transplants, diseases, cancer, and vaccines would not have been advanced. The use of animals can be inevitable, particularly in conditions that require first-hand understanding of biochemical processes in and outside the body. Therefore, animals should be used for scientific research.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is estimated that 26 animals are used for testing, research and education in the US each year. More than 70.000 of them are nonhuman primates. Using animals as research subject in medical experiments is broadly condemned on two parts. The first one is because it wrongly violates the rights of animals, and second one, because it wrongly impose on sentient creatures much avoidable suffering. These two grounds are both deserve definitive dismissal.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays