3.2 Explain the appropriate criteria to use for judging the quality of the assessment process…
A budget is an instrument used to help managers ensure that the resources used effectively and proficiently toward the goals of an organization. A budget projection can be made on a yearly base depending on previous year or existing one. They can further be broken down quarterly or monthly depending on it use. Generating a budget is complex undertaking, and for a budget to be effective the organization ought to follow it strictly. However, no matter how closely a business follows their guidelines there will always be some form of variances. The organization should expect a few variances and be able to work these discrepancies in any budget constraints.…
• which standards/criteria are to be assessed (e.g. a module, unit, award) and whether the assessment is initial, formative or summative…
1. Determine who will be involved in the detailed evaluation and communicate the role and expectations. These should include the project team and any other stakeholders as may be appropriate. The evaluation process will take time, ensure the individuals selected have been properly briefed, and the time commitments clearly understood.…
that looks at the broad goals of the project; here an evaluation plan format that provides a "big picture" outline is suggested. Identifying the "big" questions that the evaluation is to answer is the first step of the Project-Wide Evaluation Plan. One must then determine the sources that will be used to provide the information that will answer the questions. The next step is to address how the info will be collected or what will be used to collect the information. Whereas the Objective-Oriented Evaluation Plan, accomplishments or process evaluation and benefits to the recipients of service or outcome evaluation should be the two focus areas.…
In your evaluation you must consider how issues such as health, welfare, social considerations, environmental issues and belief system…
Another thing that went wrong in the project is the imbalance between its scope and the scheduling of the project as result of the management pressure to produce fast result regardless of what feasible. This problem would have avoided if the scheduling of the project take into account what was possible more than what was desired given the scheduling of the project.…
There was significant misunderstanding of the complexity of this project. Not having a sufficient timeline and accurate planning of all tasks allowed room for the project to go over the timeline because there was no planning for testing and failures. In addition, staff working more than one project at a time and not being solely dedicated showed initiative…
After carefully read the scenario as a team leader, I must say that there is a communication gap between the team members including lack of co-operation and it results organization not achieving its goal and success. As a team leader…
Poor leadership and lack of direction is main reason why a project can fail, this is linked with planning in that if the team members don't know whats going on they can't work.…
Classification of the project—e.g., large/small, platform/incremental, complex/ typical * Analysis of information gathered * Recommendations * Lessons learned * An appendix with backup information to support recommendations. 2. Why is it difficult to perform a truly independent, objective review?In most cases those performing the review have some previous knowledge of the project, which presents opportunities for bias. Sometimes the review team, or facilitator, is perceived as a jury, but even jury members come with built-in biases. For example, internal politics have been known to enter into decisions concerning closure of a project. The simple point is that every attempt should be made to keep the review independent and objective. If the review of projects is a regular procedure for all projects, the negative stigma of audits is minimized. 3. Why should you separate performance…
Their own application of evaluation processes, working with others and their use of data and other feedback for evaluation.…
Executive Summary The basic concepts of project management calls for proper planning, organization and the management of a variety of resources in order to successfully achieve a certain goal. One of the most important objectives of project management is the ability to deliver a product or service within a certain time constraint or “on time” as well as being fiduciary responsible or “within budget.” Thus, it can be seen that good project management makes efficient use of time, money, personnel, materials and supplies, and methods of communication in order to successfully complete a project. Unfortunately, these basic methods of project management were not…
This is caused by the lack of commitment. Team members are not going to hold each other accountable if no one has committed to the project or plan. When a team is functioning properly they are able to hold each other accountable without taking offense. Each team should have the same standards of levels of performance. By not having accountability, team members learn that it is acceptable to miss deadlines and have mediocre performance. If team members are unwilling to hold each other accountable it pushes the burden of discipline on to the leader which can cause resentment towards the leader. Teams who are committed to accountability are able to quickly identify problems without hesitation, which establishes respect between team members when everyone if held to the same…
During the evaluation process an assessment is made on cost, efficiency, programs outcome, programs impact, program implementation, design, and program logic. A reflection of the project scope takes place during the evaluation process where a comparison between what was needed and what was provided is examined. An impact evaluation measures whether the project has achieved its intended outcomes. Cost effectiveness analysis assesses the efficiency of a project. During the evaluation, an outline of the benefits and cost of the program will be reviewed for comparison. Throughout the life cycle of the project, the project team will collect lessons learned. While the project is in cycle, the team members will record both good and bad lessons learned. In essence, the team will record new events that occurred within the life cycle of the project. This type of evaluation will both strengthen individual team members and the project team. The evaluation process will include both internal and external evaluations. The internal evaluation will be done by the project manager. The project manager will have a better overall knowledge of the program and also possess informal knowledge of the program. The project manager is already familiar with the project staff allowing the evaluation process to be less threatening. Finally having the project manager perform the team evaluation is cost effective. The…