On the other hand, school is not the right place to feed the children and parent shouldn’t take a risk their children from food poisoning. His book is particularly focus on the outcome of the study on strategies adopted in implementation of mid-day meal scheme welcomed all over as part of right education imparted but it has it limitation. I feel that school is not the right place to feed the student and if they are to be fed in the school then they must give a proper training to the cook, helper and kitchen should be constructed properly and parent association should be formed and look after the food that are providing to their children in …show more content…
As we know, India is more or less self sufficient in cereals but deficit in pulses and oilseeds. Due to changes in consumption patterns, demand for fruits, vegetables, dairy, meat, poultry, and fisheries has been increasing. There is need to increase crop diversification and improve allied activities. I really appreciate hi argument on the batten of available food items in the market because he present that real picture of the society by noting the slowdown in agriculture growth could be attributed to structural factors on the supply side, such as public investment, credit, technology, land and water management, etc., rather than globalization and trade reforms per se. His belief on ‘access to food’ can be increased through employment due to growth in labor intensive sectors or through social protection programmes but I am not sure how far his belief is right and possible. Since as we know that malnutrition problem is much broader than that of access to food under Midday Meal Scheme, however both of them come under “food security” in my understanding because most of the people access to food but they can’t get proper nutritional food which means they don’t have “food security”. So, we can conclude that food security is very much needed in our