Mill's Argument For The Legalization Of Gay Marriage
Gay marriage has been an issue is America for quite some time now, and since the legalization of gay marriage, the issue has gotten somewhat worse, but in the same way better. It has gotten worse by the fact that people are finding more extreme ways to disallow service to gays, such as the use of religion. For these people, they should really take some advice from John Stuart Mill. John was a very well known English spokesman for the ideas of the rights for women. He advocated this using his ideas of opinion, speaking out against other’s opinions and generally analyzing the whole situation and figuring out what was best. Mill would give the oppressors of gay marriage some good advice on how to figure out the best possible solution for their
…show more content…
Mill would first help them on what they have to do to help understand. So by saying this, Mill would tell them that they need to examine the whole truth, and not just public opinion ( Mill 380). Public opinion is an opinion that is shared by many different people throughout the nation, but as quick as Mill explained that, he would state that since it is just an opinion, and backed by many people, it doesn’t have to be true (Mill 382). Mill would probably then send them on a mission to talk to others and read even more into the issue than what they already have. Then he would he would help them to develop their own answer to this problem. So, following those steps, he would help them with find answers to who to talk …show more content…
Mill’s knew this was very important as well and would be very willing to help them find great readings. Like last time, he would send them away from his side of the issue, as they only have what they want their people to hear, and it may not be the whole truth (Mill 385). Although he could compare it to their works, Mills would send them to the other side again. Those on one side, again, get no truth or facts, but simply a public opinion that is going to be supported no matter what. That person would then get more knowledge that would allow him to access the situation with greater detail (Mill 385). He would probably also send that person somewhere that had factual evidence rather than just opinion, since an opinion is just an opinion. After this step, Mills would have even more to say to
Mill would first help them on what they have to do to help understand. So by saying this, Mill would tell them that they need to examine the whole truth, and not just public opinion ( Mill 380). Public opinion is an opinion that is shared by many different people throughout the nation, but as quick as Mill explained that, he would state that since it is just an opinion, and backed by many people, it doesn’t have to be true (Mill 382). Mill would probably then send them on a mission to talk to others and read even more into the issue than what they already have. Then he would he would help them to develop their own answer to this problem. So, following those steps, he would help them with find answers to who to talk …show more content…
Mill’s knew this was very important as well and would be very willing to help them find great readings. Like last time, he would send them away from his side of the issue, as they only have what they want their people to hear, and it may not be the whole truth (Mill 385). Although he could compare it to their works, Mills would send them to the other side again. Those on one side, again, get no truth or facts, but simply a public opinion that is going to be supported no matter what. That person would then get more knowledge that would allow him to access the situation with greater detail (Mill 385). He would probably also send that person somewhere that had factual evidence rather than just opinion, since an opinion is just an opinion. After this step, Mills would have even more to say to