Preview

Moderate Reconstruction Vs Radical Reconstruction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
610 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moderate Reconstruction Vs Radical Reconstruction
1. What is the difference between a. and a. Radical reconstruction aims to address social, political, and economic equality through legislative efforts. For example, socially they tried to address it by offering food and housing to slaves and providing better education for them to get a better life. Politically, the 14th Amendment helped them get equal rights and were protected under the law, while the 15th Amendment gave the right for colored people to vote. Economically there was a sharecropping system that made ex-slaves dependent on landowners having to work at the same farm they would back on before the war and would be usually stuck there either way due to the fact they needed a home and working was their way of renting. Although these advancements tried to help them, the Reconstruction fell short mainly because of racist groups like the Ku Klux Klan. The group …show more content…
Primary methods that the US government and individual reformers used were military campaigns, treaties, and different policies to recognize and address the native American threat to westward settlement. Military campaigns, like the Battle of Little Bighorn, provided temporary hope for the Native Americans but ended up having a violent outcome, but what happens at the wounded knee ends of the Indian wars which marks the end of the Native American resistance (Stanfield, Westward Expansion 10:26). There were treaties that would often move Native Americans to reservations but promises to them were usually broken bringing distrust, the Dawes Act was aimed at dividing Native Americans from their tribal lands and giving them their own individual places and teaching them different about Christianity. But this also means that this will result in significant land loss. Reformers were focused on education through stuff like boarding schools, and the schools tried to assimilate Native American children into their culture trying to change the future

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Radical Reconstruction was a movement that involved President Andrew Johnson and was set into action by a Republican controlled Congress. This Congress believed that the African-Americans were entitled to the same opportunities as the whites and should gain their citizenship. President Johnson stayed loyal to the Union throughout the Civil War even as a Governor of Tennessee, yet he vetoed the Civil Rights Bill, rejecting that the blacks and whites have the same rights. Southern elected senators…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Radical Reconstruction

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    their workers. Even as settlers moved west to find their fortunes, vigilantes and their forms of “justice” were used to control others. At the end of the Civil War, in an effort to control radical reconstruction efforts giving freed Afro-Americans more rights, the Ku Klux Klan was formed to resist these reconstruction efforts which included violently terrorizing Blacks, Whites, or anyone in…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Radical Reconstruction

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tova Wax Mrs. Oakes History/Newton 9/9/2013 Radical Reconstruction I. Black Codes Anger Congress A. Rights and Restrictions 1. Black codes granted some rights. a. African Americans could marry legally b. African Americans could own some kind of property 2. Black Codes forbade freedmen from things like: a. The right to vote b. The right to own guns c. The right to serve on juries 3. The could work as servants or farm laborers, sometimes they had to sign…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reconstruction The Union victory in the Civil War in 1865 gave approximately 4 million slaves their freedom, but the rebuilding of the South during the Reconstruction period (1865-1877) made a new set of significant challenges known. Under President Andrew Johnson’s administration in 1865 and 1866, new legislatures in southern states passed definitive “black codes” that controlled the labor and behavior of former slaves and other African Americans. The North was furious over these codes that support…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What were the goals of Radical Reconstruction and how did it lead to changes in ideas of American citizenship? Reconstruction refers to the period of time post-civil-war when the goal was to bring the South into submission and protect the African American Civil Rights. The federal government set the conditions that would allow for the Rebellious Southern States back into the Union. This was a very complex time for our country and many goals were set in order to bring everyone together to live in…

    • 1242 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and contrasts Lincoln’s plan for Reconstruction, the Wade –Davis Bill, Johnson’s plan, and Radical Reconstruction. Evaluate the successes and failures of Reconstruction. After the Civil War, Lincoln began Reconstruction with his Ten Percent Plan, which was opposed by Radical Republicans. This plan allows bring states back to the union when 10 percent of voters agree to it. Republicans was against Lincoln because they thought his policy as too merciful, and they concerned about the re-enslavement…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    How did Radical Republicans gain control of Reconstruction politics? The Radical Republicans gained control of Reconstruction with the 1866 election. There was violence against freedmen, and the Northerners were outraged. The Republicans came up with the 14th Amendment. It gave anyone born in the United States citizenship. This included freed slaves. Numerous Northerners saw the need for tougher methods, and supported them. What impact did federal Reconstruction policy have on the former…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    History/125 2012 Reconstruction Some historians argue that Radical Reconstruction was not radical enough. After studying the events of the late 19th century, defend whether or not you agree with this position. What are the long-term implications? After studying the evens of the late 19th century I would have to agree with the historians that state the radical reconstruction was not radical enough. I think that the intention of these changes were to change the general cultural belief…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Radical Republicans held a specific vision of how Reconstruction should be carried out in the aftermath of the Civil War. Their ideas included many key elements that they believed were necessary to fully address the issues that had led to the conflict and to ensure that the newly reconstructed nation could move forward to build a long thriving nation. One of the central elements of the Radical Republicans' approach to Reconstruction was a commitment to ensuring that African Americans were granted…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Civil War the actions of Radical Republicans led to many changes in the South. Leading the way to Radical Reconstruction was Congressmen Charles Sumner and Thadeus Stevens. Their were many goals and motives the Radicals hoped to obtain. The first and main goal of the Radicals was to punish the South. The Radicals also hoped to retain Republican power by taking advantage of the South any way they could. Going along with taking advantage of the South, the Radicals wanted to protect industrial growth…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays