Critical literature review on Mergers and Acquisitions
Lu Sun 13123963
Date: 7 April 2014
Contents
1. Abstract………………………………………………............3
2. Introduction………………………………………….............3
3. Literature review……………………………….……………4 3.1 The analysis performance of acquisition……………..5
3.11 Short-term analysis……………………………..5-6
3.12 Long-term analysis……………………………..6-8 3.2 Methodologies assessment…………………………..8-9 3.3 Real motivation for acquisition……………………....9-10
4. Conclusion…………………………………………..........10-11
5. References……………………………………….............12-17
6. Appendix…………………………………………………..18-19
1. Abstract
This paper provides a critical literature review on mergers and acquisitions activities over the past decades. In the short run, researches on the previous studies shows that there is insignificant increasing in shareholders’ value. Furthermore, the significant negative return was discovered to investors in the long run, even all of these are based on limited methodologies. Also, the real motivation for different types of takeover is discussed for which one is likely to increase shareholders’ value, and the method of payment is analyzed in terms of impact of investors’ value.
2. Introduction
Over the past decades, acquisition can be seen as an essential driven for entities’ strategic restructure and renewal (Jemison and Sitkin, 1986). A lot of efforts have been made by many scholars to conduct surveys on efficiency and advantages of acquisition. Some motives involved to carry out acquisition include to produce more benefits for directors (Meeks et al., 1977), to improve cost efficient as redundancy of multifunction departments by gaining synergy and to make current market share enlargeable so that creating more market value, eventually, to lead shareholders to maximize their value (Salter and Weinhold, 1979). Nevertheless, there are many academic papers hold an apposed view on this subject such as
References: Asquith, P. (1983). Merger bids, uncertainty and stockholder returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, pp. 51–83. Asquith, P. and Mullins Jr. D.W. (1986). Equity issues and offering dilution. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1-2), pp. 61-89. Berkovitch, E. B. and Narayanan, M. P. (1993). Motives for takeovers: An Empirical Investigating. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), PP. 347-362. Bhagat, S., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1990). Hostile takeovers in the 1980s: The return to corporate specialization. Brookings papers on economic activity: Microeconomics, 1990, 1-84. Bhagat, S.; Dong, M.; Hirshleifer, D.; and Noah, R. (2005). Do tender offers create value? New methods and evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(1), pp. 3-60. Campa, J.M. and Hernando, I. (2004). Shareholder value creation in European M&A. European Financial Management, 10(1), pp.47–81. Carpenter, M. A. and Sanders, WM. G. (2002). Top management team compensation: the missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), pp.367-375. Datta, D. K. and Grant. J. H. (1990). Relationship between type of acquisition, the autonomy given to the acquired firm, and acquisition success: an empirical analysis. Journal of Management, 16(1), PP. 29-44. Datta,D.K.(1991).Organizaion fit and acquisition performance: effects of post-acquistion integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.281-297. Dodd, P. (1980). Merger proposal, management discretion and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(2), pp.105–138. Eckbo, E.B. (2009). Bidding strategies and takeover premiums: A review. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, pp. 149-178. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), pp. 383-417. Firth, M. (1980). Takeovers, shareholders returns and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(2), pp.235-260. Franks, J. and Harris, R.S. (1989). Shareholder wealth effects of corporate takeovers: the U.K. experience 1955–1985. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), pp. 225–249. Gist, M.E (1987). Self-Efficany: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of management review, 12(3), pp. 472-485. Goergen,M. and Reneboog, L. (2004). Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and cross-border takeover bids. European financial management, 10(1), pp. 9-45. Gregory, A. (1997). An examination of the long run performance of UK acquiring firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 24(7-8), pp.971–1002. Gregory, A. and McCorriston, S. (2005) Foreign acquisitions by UK limited companies: short- and long-run performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 12(1), pp.99–125. Gupta, A. and Misra, L. (2004). Deal size, premium paid and the gains in financial mergers: the impact of managerial motivation. Working Paper, Bentley College of Business. Head, T. (2008). CAPM: Theory, advantages, disadvantages. ACCA Student accountant, 50-52. [Online] Available at: http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-students/2012/sa_jj08_head.pdf (Accessed 2 April 2014). Higson, C. and Elliot, J. (1998). Post-takeover returns: the UK evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 5(1), pp. 27–46. Jemison, D. B and Sitkin, S. B. (1986). Corporate Acquisitions: A Process Perspective. From Academy of Management Review, 11(1), pp.145-163. Jensen, M. and Ruback, R. (1983). The market for corporate control. Journal of financial economics, 11(1), pp. 5-55. Kaplan, S. N. and Weisbach, M. S. (1992). The success of acquisition: Evidence from Divestitures. The journal of finance, 47(1), pp.107-138. Limmack, R.J. (1991). Corporate mergers and wealth effects: 1977–86. Accounting and Business Research, 21(83), pp.239–251. Loughran, T. and Vijh, A.M. (1997). Do long term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions? Journal of Finance, 52(5), pp.1759–1790. Martynova, M. and Renneboog, L.(2009). What determines the financing decision in corporate takeovers: Cost of capital, agency problems, or the means of payment? Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, pp. 290-315. Meeks, G. (1977) Disappointing Marriages: A Study of the Gains from Merger. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Moeller, S. B.; Schlingemann, F. P. and Stulz, R. M. (2004). Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of financial economics, 73(2), pp. 201-228. Pearch ll, J. A.and Robinson Jr, R.B. (2004). Hostile takeover defenses that maximize shareholder wealth. Business Horizon, 47(5), pp. 15-24. Petmezas, D. (2009). What drives acquisitions? Market valuations and bidder performance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 19, pp. 54-74. Porter, M.E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate stragety. Howard business review, 65, (30), pp. 43-49. Rau, P.R. and Vermealen, T. (1998). Glamour, value and the post-acquisition performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(2), pp.223–253. Ravenscraft, D.J. and Scherer, F.M.(1989). The profitability of mergers. International journal of industrial organization, 7, pp.101-116. Salter, M. S. and Weinhold, W. A. (1979) Diversification Through Administration: Strategies for Creating Economic Value. New York: Free Press. Song, M.H. and Walking, R.A. (2004). Anticipation acquisitions and the bidder return puzzle. Working Paper, Ohio State University. Sudarsanam, S. and Mahate, A.A. (2003). Glamour acquirers, method of payment and post-acquisition performance: the UK evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 30(1-2), pp.299–341. Travlos, N. G. (1987). Corporate takeover bids, method of payment, and bidding firm’s stock return. Journal of finance, 42(4), pp. 943-963. Weir, C. and Laing, D. (2001). Governance structures, directors independence and corporate performance in the UK. European Business Review, 13(2), pp. 86-94.