Preview

Module P58836 Literature review

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2791 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Module P58836 Literature review
Module: Financial research project P58836

Critical literature review on Mergers and Acquisitions

Lu Sun 13123963

Date: 7 April 2014

Contents

1. Abstract………………………………………………............3
2. Introduction………………………………………….............3
3. Literature review……………………………….……………4 3.1 The analysis performance of acquisition……………..5
3.11 Short-term analysis……………………………..5-6
3.12 Long-term analysis……………………………..6-8 3.2 Methodologies assessment…………………………..8-9 3.3 Real motivation for acquisition……………………....9-10
4. Conclusion…………………………………………..........10-11
5. References……………………………………….............12-17
6. Appendix…………………………………………………..18-19

1. Abstract

This paper provides a critical literature review on mergers and acquisitions activities over the past decades. In the short run, researches on the previous studies shows that there is insignificant increasing in shareholders’ value. Furthermore, the significant negative return was discovered to investors in the long run, even all of these are based on limited methodologies. Also, the real motivation for different types of takeover is discussed for which one is likely to increase shareholders’ value, and the method of payment is analyzed in terms of impact of investors’ value.

2. Introduction

Over the past decades, acquisition can be seen as an essential driven for entities’ strategic restructure and renewal (Jemison and Sitkin, 1986). A lot of efforts have been made by many scholars to conduct surveys on efficiency and advantages of acquisition. Some motives involved to carry out acquisition include to produce more benefits for directors (Meeks et al., 1977), to improve cost efficient as redundancy of multifunction departments by gaining synergy and to make current market share enlargeable so that creating more market value, eventually, to lead shareholders to maximize their value (Salter and Weinhold, 1979). Nevertheless, there are many academic papers hold an apposed view on this subject such as



References: Asquith, P. (1983). Merger bids, uncertainty and stockholder returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, pp. 51–83. Asquith, P. and Mullins Jr. D.W. (1986). Equity issues and offering dilution. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1-2), pp. 61-89. Berkovitch, E. B. and Narayanan, M. P. (1993). Motives for takeovers: An Empirical Investigating. Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), PP. 347-362. Bhagat, S., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1990). Hostile takeovers in the 1980s: The return to corporate specialization. Brookings papers on economic activity: Microeconomics, 1990, 1-84. Bhagat, S.; Dong, M.; Hirshleifer, D.; and Noah, R. (2005). Do tender offers create value? New methods and evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(1), pp. 3-60. Campa, J.M. and Hernando, I. (2004). Shareholder value creation in European M&A. European Financial Management, 10(1), pp.47–81. Carpenter, M. A. and Sanders, WM. G. (2002). Top management team compensation: the missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), pp.367-375. Datta, D. K. and Grant. J. H. (1990). Relationship between type of acquisition, the autonomy given to the acquired firm, and acquisition success: an empirical analysis. Journal of Management, 16(1), PP. 29-44. Datta,D.K.(1991).Organizaion fit and acquisition performance: effects of post-acquistion integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp.281-297. Dodd, P. (1980). Merger proposal, management discretion and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(2), pp.105–138. Eckbo, E.B. (2009). Bidding strategies and takeover premiums: A review. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, pp. 149-178. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), pp. 383-417. Firth, M. (1980). Takeovers, shareholders returns and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(2), pp.235-260. Franks, J. and Harris, R.S. (1989). Shareholder wealth effects of corporate takeovers: the U.K. experience 1955–1985. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), pp. 225–249. Gist, M.E (1987). Self-Efficany: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of management review, 12(3), pp. 472-485. Goergen,M. and Reneboog, L. (2004). Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and cross-border takeover bids. European financial management, 10(1), pp. 9-45. Gregory, A. (1997). An examination of the long run performance of UK acquiring firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 24(7-8), pp.971–1002. Gregory, A. and McCorriston, S. (2005) Foreign acquisitions by UK limited companies: short- and long-run performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 12(1), pp.99–125. Gupta, A. and Misra, L. (2004). Deal size, premium paid and the gains in financial mergers: the impact of managerial motivation. Working Paper, Bentley College of Business. Head, T. (2008). CAPM: Theory, advantages, disadvantages. ACCA Student accountant, 50-52. [Online] Available at: http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-students/2012/sa_jj08_head.pdf (Accessed 2 April 2014). Higson, C. and Elliot, J. (1998). Post-takeover returns: the UK evidence. Journal of Empirical Finance, 5(1), pp. 27–46. Jemison, D. B and Sitkin, S. B. (1986). Corporate Acquisitions: A Process Perspective. From Academy of Management Review, 11(1), pp.145-163. Jensen, M. and Ruback, R. (1983). The market for corporate control. Journal of financial economics, 11(1), pp. 5-55. Kaplan, S. N. and Weisbach, M. S. (1992). The success of acquisition: Evidence from Divestitures. The journal of finance, 47(1), pp.107-138. Limmack, R.J. (1991). Corporate mergers and wealth effects: 1977–86. Accounting and Business Research, 21(83), pp.239–251. Loughran, T. and Vijh, A.M. (1997). Do long term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions? Journal of Finance, 52(5), pp.1759–1790. Martynova, M. and Renneboog, L.(2009). What determines the financing decision in corporate takeovers: Cost of capital, agency problems, or the means of payment? Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, pp. 290-315. Meeks, G. (1977) Disappointing Marriages: A Study of the Gains from Merger. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Moeller, S. B.; Schlingemann, F. P. and Stulz, R. M. (2004). Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of financial economics, 73(2), pp. 201-228. Pearch ll, J. A.and Robinson Jr, R.B. (2004). Hostile takeover defenses that maximize shareholder wealth. Business Horizon, 47(5), pp. 15-24. Petmezas, D. (2009). What drives acquisitions? Market valuations and bidder performance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 19, pp. 54-74. Porter, M.E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate stragety. Howard business review, 65, (30), pp. 43-49. Rau, P.R. and Vermealen, T. (1998). Glamour, value and the post-acquisition performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(2), pp.223–253. Ravenscraft, D.J. and Scherer, F.M.(1989). The profitability of mergers. International journal of industrial organization, 7, pp.101-116. Salter, M. S. and Weinhold, W. A. (1979) Diversification Through Administration: Strategies for Creating Economic Value. New York: Free Press. Song, M.H. and Walking, R.A. (2004). Anticipation acquisitions and the bidder return puzzle. Working Paper, Ohio State University. Sudarsanam, S. and Mahate, A.A. (2003). Glamour acquirers, method of payment and post-acquisition performance: the UK evidence. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 30(1-2), pp.299–341. Travlos, N. G. (1987). Corporate takeover bids, method of payment, and bidding firm’s stock return. Journal of finance, 42(4), pp. 943-963. Weir, C. and Laing, D. (2001). Governance structures, directors independence and corporate performance in the UK. European Business Review, 13(2), pp. 86-94.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Froom V. Butcher (1996)

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Task 4 In this case, although wearing a seat belt is mandatory, it is not counted as a factor determining the responsibilities of the parties. Based on the Maryland Transportation Code, § 22-412.3 - US, it can be seen that seat belts can not be an evidence of the victim negligence, which can reduce the liability of the insurance company or the party causing the damage (General Assembly of Maryland, 2017). For instance, the case of Froom v Butcher [1976] 1 QB 286 (Witting, 2015). The plaintiff was injured in a car accident due to the defendant's negligence.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Creator Winnie Holzman’s show “My So-Called Life” and Marjane Satrapi’s The Complete Persepolis both highlight the immense changes that surround adolescences in their relationships with others as well as how they perceive their own identity. It is during the stage of adolescence and emerging adulthood that young people are dealing with what Erikson refers to as identity versus confusion, in which adolescence are doing a lot of re-visitation to past stages of their life, and are constantly at battle with understanding truly who they are. Holzman’s show follows an adolescent named Angela Chase, who is a high school sophomore trying to discover and assert her identity. Satrapi’s graphic novel depicts her hardships with being an adolescent in a new country away from her family, and how she struggles with understanding her true self.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Extended Essay

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Acquisition initially provides growth to the acquirer. An empirical research study based on a sample of 12023 acquisitions shows that these firms received an equally weighted abnormal announcement return of 1.1% (Moeller, Schlingemann and Stulz, 2004). The return was generally positive, which indicates that acquiring-firms’ market value might ascend faster than original schema while the overall risk is constant. Therefore after a formal announcement is made, acquisition, to some extent, stimulates firms’ growth within a short-term observation period. Moreover, according to another study in the US, shareholders of both target firms and bidder firms benefited from acquisitions at different levels in the short-term (Sudarsanam, 2003), which could probably be explained by the generalized market rise promoted by optimistic expectations of investors after careful and thorough risk analysis (Petmezas, 2009). The rise of market value means available revenues newly…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Chang, S. Suk, D. Failed takeovers, methods of payment, and bidder returns, Financial Review. 33 (2), May 1998.…

    • 2889 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finance

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages

    References: Bertoncelj, A. (2006) “Corporate restructuring and controlling interest”, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Oeconomica, Vol. 51, No.1, pp. 59-73.…

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Danaher Case Study

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages

    • Despite the claim that acquisitions destroy value certain companies excel as acquirers and deliver outstanding value for shareholders. • We studied the relationship between long term total shareholder returns (TSR) and different acquisition strategies and a variety of deal characteristics. – The only trait that consistently has a strong positive relationship with long term TSR across each industry is acquisition frequency. • We call them Serial Acquirers and many generate outstanding results by being better at planning, executing and integrating acquisitions than their peers.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Travlos, N.G., 1987, Corporate Takeover bids, method of payment, and bidding firms ' stock returns, Journal of Financ 4, 943-963.…

    • 19168 Words
    • 77 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DO SHAREHOLDERS OF ACQUIRING FIRMS GAIN FROM ACQUISITIONS? Sara B. Moeller Frederik P. Schlingemann René M. Stulz Working Paper 9523 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9523 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2003…

    • 13122 Words
    • 53 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stimulus to trail a merger or acquisition can be substantial; a company that unites itself with another can realize enhanced economies of scale, better sales revenue and market share in its market, expanded diversification and augmented tax effectiveness. Nevertheless, the underlying business justification and funding tactics for mergers and takeovers are considerably diverse.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    8. Lichtenberg, F. and Siegel, D. (1990). The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behaviour. Journal of Financial Economics. 9. Lubatkin, M. and Chatterjee, S. (1994). Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply?. Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 109-136. 10. Pinegar, M. and Wilbricht, L. (1989). What Managers Think of Capital Structure Theory: A Survey. Financial Management, Winter, pp. 82-91. 11. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 12. McConnell, J. and Muscarella, C. (1985). Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, pp. 399-422. 13. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American economic Review 48, June, 261-197. 14. Dividend Smoothing, Agency Costs, and Information Asymmetry: Lessons from the Dividend Policies of Private Firms. 15. Michael S. Rozeff , Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 249-259, Fall 1982. 16. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 17. Henri Servaes Tobin’s Q and the gain from takeovers: The Journal of Finance • Vol. LXVI, No. 1 • March 1991. 18. Easterbrook (1984): Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends. 19. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Berle and Means. 20. Brealey & Myers on Corporate Finance: Capital Investment and Valuation , Richard A Brealey, Stewart C Myers. 21. The Black (1976) effect and cross market arbitrage in FTSE-100 index futures and options.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to understand the effect the 1980’s movement had on corporate management it is essential to trace those factors that played a key role in originating these changes as well as those activities that contributed to them. Firstly, with regards to the relation between corporate managers and shareholders before the 1980’s, it could be assessed that managers paid little importance to shareholder interests and were more loyal to the corporation itself. In most cases, compensation systems for management were not related to market performance. The need for better corporate performance gave birth to takeovers, junk bonds and leveraged buyouts. Takeovers were distinguished not only by hostility but also by the use of debt as the main source of capital. This mechanism consisted in the acquisition of firms by obtaining loans rather than by using their own resources (cash or equity issue). Managers reacted negatively towards them giving birth to hostilities. Evidently, management was reluctant to these new changes probably because they did not understand the real issue…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Merger Acquisition

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unlike previous merger waves, more companies have been successful with their acquisitions than not, although it is not clear whether this trend will continue. As shown in Figure 1.2, our analysis, in consultation with Towers Perrin, of shareholder performance in deals during the 1980s and 1990s was negative when compared to the market, whereas the performance of deals in the recent merger wave is thus far better than the market.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mantravadi, D. P. (2008). Post-Merger Performance of Acquiring Firms from Different Industries in India. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics , 193-204.…

    • 5754 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Takeover of companies is a well-accepted and established strategy for corporate growth. International experience of takeovers and mergers and amalgamations has been varied. Nonetheless, one of its important lessons is that, its appeal as an instrument of corporate growth has usually been the result of an admixture of corporate ethos of a country, shareholding pattern of companies, existence of cross holdings in companies, cultural conditions and the regulatory environment.…

    • 4950 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social stratification is defined as the division of a society into a number of hierarchically arranged strata. Strata are the levels or classes in society which are layered in a structured hierarchy with the least privileged at the bottom and most privileged at the top. (Giddens, 1977)…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays