Preview

Molly Ivins Taking A Stab At Our Infatuation With Guns Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
278 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Molly Ivins Taking A Stab At Our Infatuation With Guns Summary
In the news article “Taking A Stab At Our Infatuation With Guns” by Molly Ivins she asserts the idea that in order to possess a gun, people should get a license to own one or to not own one at all. According to Irvin, the cliché that “guns do not kill, people do” helps her argument stand out. It helps asserts her idea, because she says that the guns main use is to kill. Ivins is certain that people who are crazy should not be allowed to own a gun, and that only those who want to be a part of “a well-regulated militia”. Her reasoning behind it is she does not accept kids who own gun or are in reach of gun does not put all of us in a safer place. Equally to what Ivins argued about gun control; is that what Ivins insist is a problem about who

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Molly Ivins Analysis

    • 55 Words
    • 1 Page

    In her article “Get A Knife, Get A Dog, but Get Rid of Guns.” by Molly Ivins discusses her disapproval of guns as protection. Specifically, Ivins explains how guns harm civilization and do more harm than good. Ivins also states an alternative to guns that won't easily kill. Molly Ivins is correct for three reasons.…

    • 55 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This existing policy of course is the second amendment. She explains how she highly agrees with the amendment but that people are seeing the amendment in the wrong way. The second amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” The author also has no facts to be proven, her argument is mostly surrounded by opinion and belief. The only facts she really has are the most obvious to everyone: like a person who drives a car is licensed or the second amendment has the word militia in it.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A controversial argument opposite to both viewpoints of gun control mentioned, is the negatives of guns and the need for gun control. In the article, “The Impact of Violence on Children,” Joy Osofsky elaborates that gun violence in communities are extremely detrimental in communities especially on children. Osofsky, a professor of public health in Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, uses masses of children psychology, scenarios and experiences to demonstrate the importance of gun control and to increase gun regulations. She focuses on children’s response to guns and violence, showing that the exposure of gun violence to children at their early ages not only increases their interest to use guns, but also the likelihood to use…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although guns provide a good way to protect us, they also offer an effective method to kill others. Perhaps many people may argue that gun is just one of the numerous tools killers use, they believe that gun control can’t eliminate murder. However, “The biggest problem with firearms is they kill quickly and they kill efficiently. The problem there is the instant impulse leads to death” (Schoener). Even though the government set up several restrictions for owning guns, killers can easily get them. What is worse, with the gun culture, people are more likely to release their anger by shooting. These entire make the gun law the most dangerous law we’ve ever…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the last couple of years, gun control has continued to be a huge controversial debate in Congress. This argument over whether gun control laws should be strict is nothing new to the world of politics. The ideas of gun control consist of laws that either keep away firearms from people, or allow one to keep guns for personal protection. They also control who the guns are being sold to and who can own them. In America, each state government has passed many gun control laws. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Whenever people hear the word gun, the thoughts…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Amidst all the raging debates regarding gun control, it is important to evaluate the issue from the perspective of the role that guns play in the lives of citizens. Crime has been on the rise in several American states. The rising cases of homicide in the past few years have prompted several states to implement stringent gun control laws that restrict purchase and possession of firearms by civilians. The American constitution allows civilians to own firearms for their own protection. However, this is not the main argument why gun control should not be allowed. This argument supports the need for Americans to protect themselves and their families. America does not need gun control but stringent policies that address the causes of gun misuse (Lott 83).…

    • 2832 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Essay Example

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is a major debate going on in the U.S. on gun control. Should people have the right to carry a concealed weapon or should they only be allowed to have a gun in their home? Another question is if the government were to ban guns would that be doing us law-abiding citizens more harm then good? Or maybe they should only allow guns in the hands of people that have had background checks and our licensed to handle them. [C]itizens in Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas are asking their state legislatures for the ability to defend themselves against violent criminal attack regardless of where the attack takes place”(Swasey 175).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abolish Mass Shootings

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the evidence found that gun control in fact could decline crime, some individuals refuse to believe so. One of those individuals is, Kit Daniels, a Texas journalist. Daniels in his article “10 reasons why gun control will not work” argues that putting a restriction on gun laws will not stop mass killings or gun related deaths nationwide, because individuals who are set out kill will find a way around these restrictions. Daniels then proceeds to argue that a limit on obtaining guns is a violation to the second amendment (Daniels). The argument that Daniels argues which is that gun control will not abolish mass shootings is accurate to an extend. As Daniels argues individuals who want are set out to kill others will proceed to do so.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against Gun Control - 5

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, as stated in the Second Amendment U.S. Constitution. Squeezing the trigger on a gun to take someone’s life will be second nature if it prevents innocent people or loved ones from being shot by an intruder. To some people gun control is a crime issue, to others it a right issue. So is a society without guns a safer place or is it? Let’s take the UK for example, in 1997 the UK banned hand guns and crimes doubled in the decade as said in The Times August 24, 2007. The cartoon picture above was found through Google on “how gun control works” by Vicki McClure Davidson posted on July 3, 2012. What is being depicted from the cartoon picture is how we will defend our safety, family’s safety, and be able to prevent acts of rage from a mass murders and crime. The person without a gun in his hand would represent any person who is for control in the United States of America. Instead of pointing a gun back he uses his fingers as a gun and holds an orange in his other hand as his second line of defense. The person holding the gun is a criminal who has bought his gun from the black market or didn’t surrender his guns that were not registered. The message in this picture is take away our rights to bear arms and the option we are left with is throw an orange at a criminal that’s pointing a gun at you. This picture employs the patho angle to imply that society would benefit from firearms in the hands of responsible citizens, but attempts to keep firearms away from these citizens do more harm than good.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Gun Control

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the United States, 88.8 out of 100 people own at least one firearm (Morris). A common misconception in today’s society is that these firearms are the root of all crime. Gun control is unconstitutional, illogical, and Nazi esque. In fact, more guns would be an improvement to our nation. Guns are a right given to us by the second amendment, and can be used for recreational purposes, self-defense, and are a means of keeping the government in check. The right to bear arms is a crucial part of this nation’s foundation, put in place to regulate the power of the very people trying to take our guns away from us.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There is no doubt that guns are an integral part of American history. Throughout the years there have been numerous debates over whether gun control is a respectable solution for the United States. Therefore, two extremely evident sides have shaped: one for weapon control and one against it. The people for weapon control have contended that the numerous school shootings were mostly a consequence of our nation's insignificant firearm control. To several this may appear like a sensible argument, yet it is an over-speculation; there are numerous different components that have resulted in awful tragedies like school shootings. Those against firearm control have contended that weapon control laws are an infringement of constitutional established rights. In any case, which side is correct? Numerous individuals might say that neither one of the sides is totally right, yet when the certainties are displayed it is clear that firearm control is not a legitimate arrangement on the facts that weapons do not murder individuals, individuals murder individuals; self-defense is the most obvious explanation behind owning a firearm, and on the details that the…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Troy Bowdish P.6 4/11/18 Argumentative Essay Gun Control Gun control is an extremely controversial topic that really came into play in 2018. Some people say gun control is going to be the only way to stop mass shootings in the U.S., while others disagree and think gun control is considered unconstitutional because it would be voiding our 2nd Amendment right, “The right to bear arms.” Americans should have stricter gun control laws because gun control should become institutionalized which would lower crime rate, limit the ways felons can get ahold of guns, and decrease the amount of mass shootings across the US drastically; however, some people might disagree because they think it’s unconstitutional or that it would violate our…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Gun Control

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun control is a controversial and divisive issue in our routine life, not only in the United States, but also all over the world. Basically, gun control refers to governmental efforts to limit or restrict the production, sale, possession and use of guns by private citizens. Some people believe that it is necessary that federal and state laws allow citizens to purchase and possess guns, or even actively require adult citizens to maintain weapons in their house, and periodically to train in their use. However, others think gun control is indispensable in our society because gunshots are the main cause of death in the United States. As for me, I prefer to support the second view because guns are lethal and the fewer people that have them the better. The only function of a gun is to kill. The more instruments of death are removed from our society, the safer we will be. With my research, I found a lot of striking data about guns menacing people’s lives. There should be gun control in the United States because guns are a menace to people’s lives.…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments have been made on both sides of the gun-control controversy. “A recent study published by the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy concluded that there is a negative correlation between…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gun Control Debate

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Instead of focusing on the amount of deaths cause by gun control, we should focus on the real problem which is violence in the U.S. According to lafa.org,”” Criminologists cite FBI statistics that teenagers committed twice as many assaults without a weapon”. This explains how violence is a greater issue rather then trying to restrict rights given to us by the 2nd Amendment. Overall, violence should be a problem burdened on people rather then inanimate…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays