Preview

Most Common Leadership Skills

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1889 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Most Common Leadership Skills
Most common Leadership Types are:
- Autocratic leadership.
- Bureaucratic leadership.
- Charismatic leadership.
- Democratic leadership or participative leadership.
- Laissez-faire leadership.
- People-oriented leadership or relations-oriented leadership.
- Servant leadership.
- Task-oriented leadership.
- Transactional leadership.
- Transformational leadership. Autocratic Leadership
Autocratic leadership is an extreme form of transactional leadership, where a leader exerts high levels of power over his or her employees or team members. People within the team are given few opportunities for making suggestions, even if these would be in the team's or organization's interest. Most people tend to resent being treated like this. Because of this, autocratic leadership usually leads to high levels of absenteeism and staff turnover. Also, the team's output does not benefit from the creativity and experience of all team members, so many of the benefits of teamwork are lost. For some routine and unskilled jobs, however, this style can remain effective where the advantages of control outweigh the disadvantages. Bureaucratic Leadership
Bureaucratic leaders "work by the book", ensuring that their staff follow procedures exactly. This is a very appropriate style for work involving serious safety risks (such as working with machinery, with toxic substances or at heights) or where large sums of money are involved (such as cash-handling). In other situations, the inflexibility and high levels of control exerted can demoralize staff, and can diminish the organizations ability to react to changing external circumstances. Charismatic Leadership
A charismatic leadership style can appear similar to a transformational leadership style, in that the leader injects huge doses of enthusiasm into his or her team, and is very energetic in driving others forward. However, a charismatic leader can tend to believe more in him or herself than in their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This article is really enlightening on the way autocratic managers affect their subordinates. I was always under the impression that even though an autocratic leader may be frustrating, they are at least very effective. This article shows that they can be for a while but it brings into perspective the underlying prey-predator relationship between the autocratic manager and his subordinates and how that can tear…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Autocratic leader benefits those employees who require close supervision. Creative employees who thrive in group functions detest this leadership style.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Autocratic leadership has benefits in some circumstances where a leader needs to take sole control of a situation with no one causing any distractions from the task in hand to enable the quick and efficient completion of…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bennett J GB600 unit2

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leadership can be defined as a process of guiding individuals, groups, or an organization to develop common goals and to create procedures to achieve the goals. A leader is a strong individual who can lead a group of people by their own strengths and also allow them to fine tune their opportunities, all without them knowing they are being lead. A leader is chosen either by promotion; by proving their talent is more measurable than their peers or with their exhibit of special leadership traits. There are many ways to define a leader, but in this paper, one will try to define and clarify charismatic leadership.…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conger, J. and Kanungo, R. (1987). Toward a behavioural theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), p.637-647.…

    • 3302 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    | Is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever, knowing, made choices based on how that person engaged you and made you think? Charismatic Leadership involves creating a self-image so powerful that people are naturally drawn to you. Some even say it’s (Christianity) an extraordinary power granted by the Holy Spirit.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Level 3 Unit 5 P1

    • 4371 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The Charismatic Leader gathers followers through dint of personality and charm, rather than any form of external power or authority.…

    • 4371 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Services

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Example of an autocratic leadership style: Surrey Police and a specialist bomb disposal team arrived on the scene after the suspicious device was found at 3.30pm A specialist Explosive Ordinance Disposal team took the shell to Lammas Park in Staines. The park was evacuated before a controlled explosion was carried out on the shell at 7.30pm. The blast could be heard from miles around, according to residents. See More. [3]…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Charismatic leader has the ability to draw others to his side and move them to…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, Dawson (2006:9) argues that there are three essential features of a charismatic leader, “first, charismatic authority is rooted in the display of exceptional abilities by an individual”.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shaun

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Boal, K.B., & Bryson, J.M. (1988). Charismatic Leadership: A Phenomenological and Structural Approach. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Ann Florini. The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World. New York, 23: Columbia University Press. Bass, B. M. 1998. Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Bendix, R. 1985. Reflections on Charismatic leadership. Blake, R., Mouton, J. 1964. The Managerial Grid: The Key to Leadership Excellence. C Jacobsen, R J. House 2001 Dynamics of charismatic leadership A process theory, simulation, and tests 75-112 The leadership quarterly 12 David L. Cawthon, 1996. The Great Man Theory Revisited, Business Horizons. Fred Luthans, 1992.Organisational behaviour 276,277 Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K., 1982. Management of organizational behaviour, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. John Dreijmanis, 2005 A portrait of the artist as a politician: the case of Adolf Hitler, 3, Science Direct. S J. Zaccaro, Zachary N.J., 2003. Leadership theory and practice: Fostering an effective symbiosis, Science direct.…

    • 2690 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leadership Impact Paper

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charismatic leaders will try to set a goal and good work environment for their workers (Fischer). The leaders of an organization will have to ensure they use the right behavior to motivate its workers. In Psalm 28:11 David asks to be taught the Lords way and be lead in a straight path. I think this is how a lot of employees feel and it is the job of the leaders to ensure they know what path the organization is going.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Post-bureaucratic practices in leadership have branched from bureaucratic leadership practices (Grahn 2008). Current leadership practices have grown into a hybridization of democratic principles and bureaucratic forms (Josserand, Teo & Clegg 2006), and continue to grow further from bureaucratic leadership methods. As such, we examine traditional leadership theories and explore its roots to bureaucracy. Firstly I evaluate the movement from the trait theory by calling on the views of Galton contrasted to Conger & Kanugo (1994) and House & Aditya (1997). Following this is an examination of Rosen’s (2008) article that exhibit soft power controls as links to bureaucratic procedures of the behavioral theory. Adding upon the criticisms of democratic…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays