Ivanitskaya, Glazer, & Erofeev (2009) suggest that ‘‘the most fundamental element of any organization that helps the organization to survive is the individual person’’ (p. 109). In order for an individual person to be useful to an organization, they must be motivated. Motivated employees help organizations survive, as they are more productive. (Lindner, J. R 1998)
Motivation relies on various agencies to be effective, therefore all workplaces fail to consist of motivated employees unless a number of these factors have been implemented. Employee engagement is a crucial concept, which must be considered by executives. The drives and movers of employee motivation must be studied in order for it to be instigated, additionally the theories that focus on drives and needs. Furthermore, theories such as the four drive theory and expectancy theory can be studied, as they are significantly important to the concept of motivation. Models such as Maslow’s needs model and the Four-Drive theory are significant, as they can act as guidelines and innovators of motivation. Understanding and having knowledge of these theories can result in achieving higher productivity. (Nasri, W, & Charfeddme, L 2012)
Employee engagement has been defined in many different ways and the definitions and measures often sound like other better-known and established constructs like organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. (Rotman, JL 2006) Ultimately, there is a continuous debate on the genuine meaning of the term, however, based on popular definitions, engagement is the extent of employees commitment, work effort and desire to stay in an organization. (Vance, R.J 2006) Companies are advantageous when
References: Ferris, K.R, 1977, A test of the expectancy theory as motivation in an accounting environment, The Accounting review, 52(3), 605-614. Lindner, J. R, 1998, Understanding employee motivation. Journal of extension, 36(3), 1-8.