Preview

Mun Ga Resolution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
552 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mun Ga Resolution
RESOLUTION 1-1
Topic: Approaches to Prevent the Acquisition of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) by Terrorist and Extremist Organizations
Sponsor: Angola

Bearing in mind that a Weapon of Mass Destruction is any nuclear, chemical, or biological weapon that can cause indiscriminate death or injury on a large scale,

Taking note of the terrorist group AL-Qaeda along with some North Caucasus terrorist groups that have consistently stated that they seek nuclear weapons and have tried to acquire them Further reminds that Osama bin Laden has stated that the acquisition of nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction is a "religious duty",

Noting with deep concern the secrecy of the possession of a nuclear weapon and the effects that follow due to the difficulty to locate the weapon,

Viewing with appreciation the Treaty of Pelindaba (signed in 1996 and came to effect in 2009) which establishes a nuclear-weapon-free zone in Africa,

Deeply Disturbed by the attack of Hiroshima and Nagasaki conducted by the United States in WWII and the effects of the nuclear bombings that caused large amounts of destruction and injury,

Applauds the Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate's (WMDD) measures to prevent threats from becoming an attack,

Taking into account the access of nuclear weapons in the U.S., UK, France, Russia, China, Pakistan, India, and North Korea,

The Republic of Angola,

1. Calls upon the creation of a committee that focuses on terrorist groups and their use and retention of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and the name of the committee as, The Research Committee of the Abolishment of Terrorism/Extremist Groups and Their Use of WMDs (RCAT);

2. Requests the RCAT conduct the following research of:

a) the availability of WMDs to terrorist and extremist groups;

b) what WMD certain terrorist groups are holding or trying to gain possession of, such as stated in preambulatory clause #2 and on line 3 & 4;

c)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the first week of August 1945, the world saw the first and only use of nuclear weapons in warfare. America’s use of the atomic bombs on Japan, resulted in the death of over 130,000 people and caused unpredicted effects on physical health. In relation today we face ongoing issues of terrorism and the possibility of dirty bombs being deployed in the U.S. The problem is the U.S. government has an inadequate system for preventing the wrong…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did it occur to you once why do weapons even exist? Have you ever asked yourself what mass destruction weapons are used for? Or what good are they doing for humanity? Weapons of mass destruction are as useless as a roasted pork in Mecca completely and utterly useless, in fact, as it is obvious in the word “mass destruction”, it is only used to kills hundreds of thousands of people and do damage worth millions and millions of pounds.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appointment in tripoli) “It has to be understood, especially in a week of sickening television shots of victims of american bombs why military force must be one of the instruments in the fight against terrorism.” (Bombing libya. the need for action) “Proof of libyan complicity in the latest terrorist attack, the bombing on April 14, of a west Berlin discotheque frequently by american soldiers, has convinced even some habitual sceptics.” (Bombing Libya) “Physical safety of the west 10 years from now depends on its setting clear rules today which tell state backers of terrorism that they will be stopped.”…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Sanger, David E., Baker, Peter. “Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms”. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, April 5, 2010. Web. January 23, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead we should look for tools of peace, methods of tranquility. The United States is devoted to “fight for the common defense” not vaporize and lay to waste its opponent. There is always a better way and we need to go out and find it, because we can no longer live in nuclear…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analyze the history of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), biological weapons, chemical weapons, and nuclear weapons and the future threat of WMD.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each, together with the fear of escalation to general nuclear war, keep it that way.” (Art, Waltz, 1983) Yet there are many who also share the view of Jonathan Schell who dramatically infers that if we, society, do not “rise up and cleanse the earth of nuclear weapons, we will “sink into the final coma and end it all.” (Schell, 1982) The central purpose of this essay is to challenge the conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation; that nuclear weapons do indeed induce a greater stability amongst international politics however this does not justify countries to continue nuclear arms proliferation with seemingly no endless bounds. However despite this it is naïve to declare that a world without nuclear weapons would be without peace either. Nuclear weapons are more than just symbols of destruction and chaos but however hold far more important roles in international politics. They are at the forefront of national security and hold considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity and as such have to be treated with utmost care and with a sense of supreme responsibility by countries that hold them.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence does exist that terrorist cells, such as Al-Qaeda, is constantly pursuing a nuclear capability. Whether that capability is acquisition or production is not necessarily certain, but the sources, as shown by the mishandling of HEU in some countries, are out there. Potential sources of nuclear weapons, like Russia and Pakistan, also present a concern due to their ample supply of tactical nuclear weapons which, by comparison of high yield bombs, have low security measures (Oppenheimer 2005,…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This nation and the international community can reduce or stop the effects of the illicit nuclear trade. There are three ways that we can focus on to solve the problem. Unfortunately, these also happen to be easier said than done.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A policy of deterrence is no longer adequate to defend the United States against weapons of mass destruction. The major institutions of American national security were designed in a different era to meet different requirements. The threats and…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Threat Assessment

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This week’s reading and notes demonstrate the complexity involved with determining whether or not a terrorist group is likely to obtain and employ a CBRN weapon and where it would most likely be used if it was procured. The prospects for a group such as Al-Qaeda or other non-state actor to obtain and use a CBRN weapon are relatively low both within the United States and abroad, however the threat is not non-existent. As noted by Sinai (2007), there are four major security issues including the terrorist groups themselves, weapon proliferation/acquisition by these groups, safe havens in weak, failed, and/or failing states, and permissive conditions in strong nations (Para 8). If one is to look at conditions in countries such as Yemen and others like it, the failed/failing state lacks any legitimate government which not only creates a power vacuum that unsavory actors seek to fill, but also lacks the capacity to effectively deter terror activities. Compounding the problem with permissive conditions for…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For the past thirty years, Iran and North Korea have been trying to develop and design a nuclear warhead, nowadays; American spies say that Iran has built a Uranium enrichment plant on Qum. Uranium enrichment is the hardest step in order to produce nuclear weapon, and North Korea has already tested nuclear weapons the past years. This is a way to prove that nuclear proliferation keeps increasing in the world and this could balance the world power in a negative way. If states that are directly against each other keep increasing their nuclear arsenal, the world could be ruled or at least influenced by an unstable military power determined by actions made with nuclear weapons. By now, only the strongest military and economic nations possess nuclear warheads and these countries maintain good political and democratic relations between each others except India and Pakistan. The fact that only this nations own nuclear weapons keep the world safe because they know that they will not use those weapons, however many nations such us Iran North Korea and Libya have been trying to obtain one for the past years. No matter what the U.N does, proliferation keeps increasing and new nations try to obtain nuclear warheads, in addition, the more nuclear bombs are in the world the easiest is to trade them among terrorist, in the past years several terrorist groups have been involved in trading nuclear arms in the black market. This is why if Nations Like Iran, North Korea And Libya continue to try to produce nuclear energy to use it as bombs warheads the world’s security can became unstable, because “Only if we abolish nuclear weapons and permanently halt the nuclear power industry we can hope to survive,” and like this avoid terrorist bands which are one of the world’s biggest security concern to acquire nuclear arms from the black market.…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    84). Furthermore, the events of 9/11 caused more terror to emerge about the WMD, even though the “al-Qaeda terrorists used weapons no more sophisticated than box-cutters,” according to Mueller. (Jackson and Sinclair, 2012). (p. 84). At first glance, it was expected that terrorists would succeed in uncovering successful attempts in weapons of mass destruction, but evidence has pointed to the fact that, “terrorist groups thus far seem to have exhibited only limited desire and even less progress in going atomic,” maintained Mueller (Jackson and Sinclair, 2012) (p. 85). Therefore, I agree with Mueller’s statement “terrorists are likely to continue to find that a WMD attack remains exceedingly difficult to pull off,” (Jackson and Sinclair, 2012) (p.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    nuclear terrorism

    • 1746 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Discussions of non-state nuclear terrorism among experts go back at least to the 1970s. In 1975 The Economist warned that "You can make a bomb with a few pounds of plutonium.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays