I think that Napoleon in a way demonstrated French Revolution ideals. The French Revolution ideals were for equality and rights for the people, but Napoleon took away a many of the rights that people wanted. The people of France were not allowed to gather in groups of people and discuss beliefs that did not follow Napoleons, and he re-established slavery. He also controlled everything that was published and banned some authors from writing or publishing books during his reign. To me he wanted the people to believe in this ideals rather than promote them to have their own beliefs and thoughts, and being killed for thinking differently to me is not equality or a…
To many people it is seen as a great thing of equality for all the people of France but, while it declared “all” people equal it forgot one important group of the French society, the women. Before Napoleon, women were treated well and had some rights in France, they were not allowed to vote yes, but they had some rights. Napoleon comes in with his “equality” code and completely strips the women of all the rights that they had. He was very religiously tolerant in his code but he excluded a huge part of society. It would be one thing if the women hadn’t had rights before he came in but power savvy Napoleon completely disrespects the women of the time by not even acknowledging them as people and stripping them of the little rights they had in the first place. The Napoleonic Code makes no distinctions between all males, but excludes women in its law (Whitman, James). A tyrant is defined as “a sovereign or other ruler who uses power oppressively or unjustly” (“the definition of a tyrant”). With the Napoleonic Code Napoleon uses his power to unfairly and unjustly oppress the French women of the…
Napoleon limited who had power and rights in society in a few ways. Napoleon created the Napoleonic Code, which guaranteed everyone equal rights except for women and black people. Because of the code, it was controlled who had rights. Also, Napoleon created schools for boys ages ten to sixteen, called lycees. While many people saw…
Napoleon was indeed a great man, in that he made a significant impact on the course of history, although with both positive and negative consequences. He was one of history's greatest military commanders and succeeded in conquering most of Europe and did much to modernize the nations he ruled. He also introduced the Code Napoleon, which brought unity, order, progress and reform to France and Europe and the Code is still used today.…
Napoleon, the great French leader, is often seen as a hero, but if you look closer there is great evidence showing that he is a villain. He seemed to try to improve the country greatly, but really he was just trying to improve his reputation, a very selfish thing to do. For example he adopted a set of laws called the Napoleonic Code. These laws were put in place to give the country a uniform set of rules and eliminate many injustices, but really these limited individual freedoms, something that was greatly stressed before during the early stages of the revolution. It took away the freedom of speech, press, and restored slavery. I don’t believe that Napoleon had the people in mind when he made these laws; I think he wrote them to keep the people under control so he could rule them with less effort and (again) improve his reputation. If a leader rules without any uproar from the citizens then he must be the most brilliant, heroic ruler ever, right? This is exactly what I thought his intentions were. Though a very smart idea this was, it was morally wrong and unjust. In addition Napoleon tried to put other countries against each other. For example in 1803 after he failed the Saint Domingue expedition he sold the Louisiana territory to the United States. His reason was to “punish the British, the sale assures the forever power of the United States, and I have given England a rival that will, sooner or later, humble their pride.” I think he choose to do this so that when all the other powerful countries were fighting he could rise to the occasion and “take over the world.” Not a very heroic thing to do… Finally Napoleon manipulated other people to get what he wanted. In a way he brainwashed them. He created a huge empire that he could barely sustain so he had to threaten the leaders, from countries like Portugal, Prussia, and Sweden, with military actions. This was kind-of cowardly. Clearly…
Good characteristics of being a good leader consist of being merciful and cruel when you need to be. As a leader, you shouldn’t be merciful all the time because this will lead to your people trying commit crimes against each other. Also, if you are too cruel to your people, your people will try and rebel against you. Also, your people won’t like you or respect you, if you balanced between cruelty and being merciful. Then your people would respect you and not commit any crimes. Napoleon fulfills some of these characteristics of being a good leader. Napoleon isn’t a cruel or merciful leader. Napoleon is merciful most of the time unless on Animal Farm there are traders or people that admit to stealing or committing a crime, then he has them executed.…
It has long been argued whether or not Napoleon Bonaparte should be considered a hero or a villain. I believe Napoleon should be considered a hero. I think he should be considered a hero because he was a strong military leader which allowed him to expanded French territory, and he modernized France.…
In 1793 Napoleon had its first offensive, and conquered Belgium, The Netherlands and parts of Germany and also recaptured Toulon from the British. In 1796 he conquered North Italy and founded some republics there, whereas it seemed that those republics were free, they were under French rule as was the Batavian Republic(Belgium and the Netherlands). This shows that Napoleon wanted to look like a good person, but he actually wasn’t. Also he destroyed an Egyptian army that was 4 times bigger, but the British destroyed a French fleet, so it turned out to be a failure.…
When Napoleon took power, Paris had a vibrant newspaper business, by the end of his reign there were only four newspapers left due to his denial of a free-press and all of these had been under his control. These newspapers were censored and used by Napoleon for propaganda. He also had spies and informers working for his Ministry of Police, he used special courts and arbitrary imprisonment which really supports the concept of a police state under a dictatorship. Implementing these resources allowed Napoleon to repress any opposition to his rule and crush any civil unrest Considering these facts only it would appear that Napoleon was nothing but a tyrannical dictator , but , this would not necessarily be a fair judgment as throughout his reign he continued to use certain administrative bodies which limited his freedom of action , such as the Senate and the Legislative Body which suggests he didn’t have or want overall power as a dictator for matters such as law making . He also introduced the Civil Code , which assured legal rights , he also instituted a number of reforms that brought genuine benefits to the French people , such as religious toleration , which not only followed revolutionary ideal of freedom and equality as anyone was allowed to practice their chosen religion , but would also have had popular support in France .…
This essay will give an overview of Napoleons life, explain the excerpt from "The Prince", and explain, using evidence from Napoleon's life, how Napoleon followed the advice in "The Prince".…
He was a savior of France. If there had been no Napoleon, the Republic would not have survived,” said David Chanteranne, editor of a magazine published by Napoléonic Memory. Napoleon Bonaparte was considered a hero by much of France during the 19th century. He had outstanding military expertise and great leadership qualities, so he is a hero in my eyes as well. Napoleon is known as one of the world’s greatest military leaders, because of his unique strategies and determination.…
It is clear that without Napoleon France’s peasants would not have had a fair life and the revolution would have been a waste. Clearly, with the help of Napoleon the Napoleonic code was made. It united France by preserving the social aims of the revolution, preserving the interests of the rising middle class and it guaranteed civil…
Napoleon Bonaparte was born Napoleone di Buonaparte in Corsica, August 15, 1769. His family consisted of his father, a lawyer and member of the Nobility, his mother, his sister and his seven brothers. He was a small child, and often was teased by his classmates when he was enrolled in military college at a very early age in 1777, and it is believed that this influenced the determination he had to win later in life. Later, he went to Ecole Militaire from 1784 to 1785. Also in 1785, his father died. Even so, he graduated with the rank of second lieutenant. At this time, great things were expected of Napoleon. However, no one could have guessed that this 16-year-old would go on to make history.…
Napoleon Bonaparte is considered one of history 's greatest heroes and also one of its most contemplated leaders. Some people see him as a child of the enlightenment, preserving the accomplishments of the French Revolution, and exporting the ideas of liberty, equality, and nationalism to the rest of Western Europe making him a hero. Others argue that he was a ruthless tyrant who trampled on the very ideals for which the Revolution had been fought. Yet, Napoleon showed more accomplishments in his life to make France a better country. A hero is defined as, "a man of distinguished courage or ability, admired for his brave deeds and noble qualities," (www.merriam-webster.com) and these noble qualities are just what Napoleon had. He had audacity and was not afraid of others even though his stature would appear quite contrary. Moreover, he was decisive which gave the citizens of France the sense of national identity and the pride they needed. Finally, he was caring for his people to gain their support and made France a better place for even the poor. Napoleon was a hero to France and its people and should be remembered as so.…
He is not a villain in my opinion. People may believe that he went about conquering Europe for personal glory, but that is completely false. Many Frenchman did die in fact fighting for Napoleon, but they also fought for the ideas of the French republic, which is much more worth fighting for. A true villain is Hitler and his scheme of genocide against the Jews. Napoleon on the other hand, was the first leader to grant Jews equal rights as citizens, because of his belief of equality for all people. Europe was very anti-Semitic at the time, and the European monarchs were outraged, which I think makes Napoleon a very brave and admirable leader. I would very much rather to have lived under Napoleon in France where there was liberty and equality. I…