Preview

Napoleonic Warfare: Transformation Toward A Modern Form Of Warfare

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
995 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Napoleonic Warfare: Transformation Toward A Modern Form Of Warfare
Most scholars would agree that Napoleonic Warfare began a transformation towards a modern form of warfare that still exist. The evidence shows that warfare in the Napoleonic Era is fundamentally similar to warfare practiced today. The French Revolution and subsequent Napoleonic Wars revolutionized military strategy and military operations. The Napoleonic era introduced three fundamental changes essential and relevant to how many militaries function and fight today. One change is the shift from a dynastic, private Army, owned by the king, to a public institution, funded, and controlled by the nation. A second change is from an Army with no military organization to a self-sufficient, multi-echelon organizations. Finally, Napoleon’s concept …show more content…
Profound changes in the military institutions and practices, some already firmly established under the Old Regime, other still tentative and experimental were adopted by the Revolution, and develop further.7 The French Revolution invented the modern strategic organization that we still use today. The modern strategic organization employed multilevel staffing and planning, and worked with many specialized agencies serving one shared national purpose.8 In 1792 and 1793, the French pioneered the use of the combat division, combining infantry, cavalry, and artillery to create a small Army of a few thousand men which could operate either independently or with other divisions.9 Napoleon improved the organization structure by combining divisions into corps. The corps sustained short battles without supplies shortfalls. Napoleon utilized centralized command and decentralized execution to efficiently control the corps. He created multilevel staffing but maintain decision making at his level. These and other innovations changed the conduct of war and remain relevant to modern military …show more content…
The transformation from an Army owned by the king to an Army that supports the nation is similar to today’s United States Army. The United States Army is open to all eligible citizens and promotions are based on performance and education, not one’s social status. Napoleon benefited from the new way of thinking and advanced from lieutenant to general. He later became emperor of France. Napoleon’s concept of adding an echelon to obtain better command and control has remained relatively unchanged over the past two hundred years. Napoleon first used the concept in an invasion of Russia in 1812. The concept continues to provide a military advantage to the United States Army during its’ fight against terrorism. Napoleon’s formation arrangement allowed for faster reaction time to his enemy assaults. The United States military utilized the concept that involves combined arms operations, bold deep attacks, and flexible operational methods. The shift to a national Army supported by its citizens, the introduction of multi-echelon organizations and maneuver warfare are just a few similarities between the Napoleonic era warfare and warfare practiced today. The Napoleonic era revolutionized the military and can be seen in the warfare practiced

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This book captures three main ideas as we look into our nation's military. The first is how industrialization and new technology constantly changed the way we fought. The early musket caused us to be slow on the draw and with improves of firearms, fighting became faster paced. Cannons made long range fighting more prevalent and began the early stages of field artillery. The invention of the automobile caused mobilization to become easier and more accessible. Wars were shorter due to less travel time. Tanks became a strong force on the battlefield. Eventually airplanes threw in a more strategic element to fighting. As they were developed, air strikes and air assaults were a capable force. This led to more thorough planning and threw in more opportunities to win battles. Second, is how breakdowns in leadership caused losses on the battlefield and unnecessary wars being fought. The most famous example is General Custer at Little Bighorn where he led approximately 210 men against a fierce 2,000 man Indian force. Despite warnings and obvious strategic setbacks, he fool-heartedly marched his entire element to their deaths. One less well known is General George McClellan. Maslowski writes that McClellan was reluctant to fight battles. He is quoted saying, "More Likely McClellan feared taking risks and was paralyzed by the prospect of carnage." He lacked the communication skills and the logistical techniques. Maslowski continues to say, "Only trial and error, under circumstances where error could be fatal, produced the necessary adjustments." Considering how warfare changed rapidly throughout the years, this type of adjusting was not uncommon. The last idea is the correlation between war and national policy. Almost every major new policy put in place cause some sort of military backlash, the first being the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Soon thereafter we had army's from Europe knocking at our door to try and maintain their control of the colonies.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Technological advancements could play a role in this area to explain the change in the trajectory, but the author’s rejection of technological answers does not allow him to do this. Also, Lynn concentrates on institutional factors (recruitment, social composition, and motivation, command administration) to describe his model for evolution yet at various occasions he emphasizes political-economic, military competitiveness, and minimally technological advancements as his explanatory factors for change. Lynn does not clearly give explanation to what brought on the change in different army styles. In one army style military unreliability, increased political centralization, and increased economic monetarization are emphasized and in other centuries technological improvements or political costs are seen as the most influential. In this way Lynn’s explanatory factors are not internally consistent from century to century. For example, if technology had an impact in one time period than Lynn does not give valid reasoning for why it was not considered important in another…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Battle tactics are said to have changed over time. However, just the opposite is evident. Battle tactics are for anyone to use, but work best with military’s that are stable and continually training. In many cases, militaries throughout the world can be seen using the same tactics today as used in the 2nd Punic War particularly The Battle of Cannae. What make tactics improve so well is the repetition of both practicing in training and executing tactics on the battlefield. Battle tactics improved with the establishment of a professional military because, most soldiers who were now veterans could move up in ranks and understand how they were previously defeated in different battles.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jomini when describing the principles of war he makes the argument that “To throw by strategic movement the mass of an army, successively, upon the decisive point of a theater of war…” (Jomini, pg70). Clausewitz makes it clear that war is serious and therefore a country cannot limit their war effort saying, “He who uses his forces ruthlessly, shrinking from no amount of bloodshed must gain an advantage if his adversary does not do the same,” (Clausewitz pg 265). Both of these men learned many of ideas of military success came from the Napoleonic wars. The French under Napoleon’s regime shows the way in which a population that practices total war principles, an army in mass and ruthless no prisoners policy, would be able to defeat any army that does not also practice this same mentality. Napoleon incorporated both the ideas of strategic movement with those of principles of ruthless military campaign.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Advancements in weaponry surpassed ancient tactics dating back to the Revolutionary War and inflicted staggering casualties. Railways allowed supplies and reinforcements to transcend conventional means, battles became fast paced requiring even more men to fuel the engine of war. These weapons and technologies bred the…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Towards the end of the eighteenth century the nature of warfare would dramatically change on both upon the battlefield but more importantly how it affected society. Continental Europe was engulfed in war from 1792 following the establishment of the French Republic and continued with the rise of Napoleon until his eventual defeat in 1815. Between 1792 and 1809 the French army seemed to grow from strength to strength turning from a “métier of the aristocrat” small, professional army to the first mass citizen army of the modern world. The success of the Napoleonic era French military in the first five coalition wars cannot be credited to one cause alone. Instead the Revolutionary/Napoleons’ Army (Grande Armée from 1805) had several contributing factors to its major successes.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    As technology has progressed throughout history, one of the main factors to technology progressing has been wars. From the days of fighting in Early Times where battles were fought with masses of men taking over territories to today where a button can be pushed from 35,000 feet in the air and drop a bomb to destroy a city, wars have had an impact on history and technology as a whole. There have been many changes to the way a military member viewed society in his ever-changing role any many different technologies used to be successful in winning wars and the effect the military member had on society. Technology in the military began with Archimedes around 213BCE.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cambridge Illustrated History of Warfare, edited by Geoffrey Parker, attributes the beginnings of this change to Maurice de Nassau, a Dutch royal family member who developed a new method to employing musketeers in battle in the 1590s . Before Nassau’s development, European musketeers fought in large, slow-moving square formations with pikemen for defense ; the Spanish tercio unit had followed this tactic with much success . Nassau, who was fighting the Spanish at that time, arranged his musketeer units into long, thin, linear formations in order to use a volley firing system that had not been employed effectively as a tactic since Roman times . The tactic proved quite successful in battle and quickly spread to other parts of Europe , eventually making linear formations of musketeers the new standard in European…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In pre-modern Europe, a military revolution was taking place which would propel Europe to forefront of military superiority. While the military revolution produced significant technological advancements specifically with respect to gunpowder, cannons, and sailing ships, such advancements would come with a plethora of technological, political and social consequences both positive and negative. Along with the predominant consequence of driving Europe towards political centralization, the Military Revolution also marked the emergence of the European global conquest. Despite the many significant technological advancements made during the Military Revolution, none had a greater impact than that of gunpowder.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each European country had developed or was in the process of developing large standing armies. These armies were well disciplined and obeyed orders. An army would face his adversary across the field and progressively march towards them, shoulder to shoulder, in tight formation. When in range the soldiers in the first row would drop to one knee, present arms, and fire in unison on command. Then the soldiers would reload while the opposing force fired upon them. The point was not to kill all of the soldiers in the opposing force but to thin their numbers so it would be easier to charge in with bayonets and succeed. Discipline was crucial to victory because a disorganized army could not stand against a bayonet charge. This is called linear tactics due to the fact that the armies lined up and marched in straight…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the Minutemen of the Revolutionary War to today's high-tech weapons, the American Military has changed and morphed to meet the needs of the times. Our military has evolved massively since the days of our Forefathers and is still growing every day. There are three key events where the American Military was improved and/or evolved setting a path for a more organized, trained, well-equipped, and respected Military. The events that will be discussed regarding the American Military was the Civil War, Mahan’s lectures, and the development of American Air Force. All of which greatly impacted the efficiency and success of the military and gave the United States great foundation for developing and advancing.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French Revolution was a time of sweeping social and political change in France that kept going from 1789 until 1799, and was mostly conveyed forward by Napoleon amid the later development of the French Empire. The Revolution toppled the government, set up a republic, experienced fierce times of political turmoil, lastly finished in an autocracy under Napoleon that quickly conveyed a large number of its standards to Western Europe and past. Motivated by liberal and radical thoughts, the Revolution significantly modified the course of cutting edge history, setting off the worldwide decrease of outright governments while supplanting them with republics and liberal democracies. Through the Revolutionary Wars, it unleashed a rush of worldwide…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But it was not the soldiers that made this Army so formidable, it was the artillery. French invasion of Italy in 1494 – modern age of warfare – change the nature of the state itself by provided powerful impetus for the rise of modern governments RMA – revolutions in military affairs History of warfare profoundly altered by forces, such as the rise of nationalism and democracy, little to do with new tools – but the tools of war DO matter Technology creates the potential for a military revolution; the extent to which militaries, societies, states, governments, etc exploit the new tools of warfare to create a military revolution depend on organization, strategy, tactics, leadership, training, morale, and other human factors; demands a paradigm shift from one set of assumptions to another Gunpowder revolution saw the rise of Western militaries over non-Western militaries who Since the rise of modern nation-states in the 16th and 17th centuries, shifts in military power have been closely associated with shifts in governance…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rogers talked about what brought the military revolution, and he based his findings on solid justification according to him, in his book "The hundred years war" he said the Military revolution was brought on by "Infantry Revolution and Artillery Revolution". According to him the ‘Infantry Revolution’ began with the adoption by the English under Edward III of a combined formation consisting of longbowmen and dismounted men-at-arms fighting in tactically defensive positions. Other contributing developments included the Flemish, Swiss and Scottish use of pike in the 14th and 15th centuries, which reduced the previous dominance of the mounted feudal aristocracy on the battlefield. Through these developments, Rogers argued that this Military Revolution began the process of transforming medieval, feudal military structures in Europe into more recognisably modern professional…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Crimean War

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Napoleons tactics such as ‘marching dispersed,’ proved effective and therefore was copied by the king’s armies. This was an effective tactic on large battlefields, however the small mountainous terrain of the Crimea, meant that warfare was more static. Pre-1854 men would fight on large expanses of land in formation; we would not have seen a dug in defensive position. But the Crimean war introduce the world to trench warfare. This is seen in WW1 and again illustrates a…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays