Preview

Narrative Essay Life Changing Experince

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1887 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Narrative Essay Life Changing Experince
CBS NEWS

By STEPHANIE CONDON / CBS NEWS/ August 30, 2013, 5:52 AM
Can Obama strike Syria without Congress' consent?
President Obama has yet to say what course of action he'll take to respond to the alleged use of chemical weapons by President Bashar al Assad's regime in Syria, but his administration has previewed the justification it will use if Mr. Obama decides to take military action.

Mr. Obama on Wednesday said he has "no interest in any open-ended conflict in Syria." However, he added, "we do have to make sure that when countries break international norms on weapons like chemical weapons that could threaten us, that they are held accountable."

To launch an assault against the Assad regime that meets domestic legal standards, Mr. Obama's actions would have to pass constitutional muster and meet the statutory requirements set by the 1973 War Powers Resolution.

Before taking over the executive branch, Mr. Obama and Vice President Joe Biden strongly asserted that the president's ability to use military force is constrained by Congress. Yet since Mr. Obama took over the White House, the administration hasn't shied away from unilaterally deciding to take limited military action.

Mr. Obama's approach follows one that presidents have taken since the end of World War II, when administrations started exercising their war powers more independently. Some administrations have argued the War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional, but the Supreme Court has never weighed in on the issue -- leaving the extent of the president's war powers an open question. "Part of the problem is these are legal issues, and legal issues are settled in court at the end of the day," James Lindsay, a senior vice president at the Council on Foreign Relations, told CBSNews.com. "And when courts choose not to adjudicate it, people are free to lay down their interpretation of the rules."
Predictably, when it comes to war powers, the president has the political advantage -- he is,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy 315 Week 3 Quiz
    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Psy 315 Week 3 Quiz

    | The president's ability to bypass the Senate and create foreign policy directly through the use of executive agreements was limited by Congress in 1972 with the passage of thea. Case Act.b. Hatch Act.c. Congressional Budget and Impoundment Act.d. War Powers Act.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    War Powers Resolution Research Paper
    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War Powers Resolution Research Paper

    It equips Congress with constitutional power over the president, and prohibits any one person from plunging the nation into war. In conclusion, the War Powers Resolution works well within the constitutional authority of Congress and strengthens the balance of powers among the branches of our government. In this scenario, the President violated the due process of issuing military action without the consent of Congress, and as a result, this case would be weighed in favor of…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1973 War Powers Act
    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1973 War Powers Act

    1. If no judicial court of authority, namely the United States Supreme Court, has stricken the 1973 War Powers Act and declared it null and void constitutionally, how is it that the authors of the text book are able to conclude Congress has few, if any, war powers remaining? How can this be? The law is the law, is it not? (Specifically, explain the political phenomenon that has occurred here and has similarly occurred in other legal and constitutional matters allowing the law to be ignored.)…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Write an Essay Discussing Whether or Not Presidents Are Powerful, Under What Circumstances, and Provide Specific Examples of Powerful Presidents?
    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Write an Essay Discussing Whether or Not Presidents Are Powerful, Under What Circumstances, and Provide Specific Examples of Powerful Presidents?

    Under the constitution the President has military, legislative, appointment, and diplomatic power. Our framers of the constitution wanted a strong military but not complete seizure of the government. Diplomatic powers and appointment powers are also under senate’s approval. The President’s legislative power can be over ridden by congress so by far this is not one of the power points of presidency. The President has sole powers of pardons granted. Under circumstances of war and terrorism the president engages in the most power.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explore The Three Facts From The 1787 Constitution
    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explore The Three Facts From The 1787 Constitution

    When he is elected to be the president of the United States of America he then controls the Army, Navy and Militia. That means if the president wants a threat eliminated he could command his military to eliminate it.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War Powers Act Research Paper
    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    War Powers Act Research Paper

    The President of the United States is a very important and strong leader that does not have the right to officially go to war without the approval of Congress. This law is dubbed the War Powers Act since it states that the President has to notify Congress when sending troops to hostilities and if in a state of emergency, 42 hours after (SAS Institute Inc). Presidents in the past, like President Richard Nixon and George W. Bush, have argued that by enforcing the War Powers Act, Congress is taking away constitutional authorities that have been exercised for many years. On the other hand, people, such as George Mason, claim that giving the power to declare war to one singular person is a very untrustworthy situation (SAS Institute Inc). This argument…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    War Powers Resolution Analysis
    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page

    War Powers Resolution Analysis

    My initial reaction would be to side with Congress. The War Powers Resolution allows the president to engage in an act of war without the consent of congress only in the case of an attack on the United States, or by “statutory authorization”. Based on this, the legislative branch seems to be in the right in this situation. I would ask the president questions pertaining to the goals of the US forces in the region, and questions to Congress such as to their opposition to the presidents actions.…

    • 88 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unilateral Perspectives On Presidential Power
    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page

    Unilateral Perspectives On Presidential Power

    There are two perspectives on presidential power. The two perspectives are presidential power by persuasion and presidential without persuasion or unilateral. The first perspective where presidential power is persuasive means that the president needs help in order to achieve an outcome. The president tries to convince other branches of government or other high-ranking officials to implement an idea of his. This all depends on the president’s ability to bargain with other branches or even his own branch to influence policy. The Unilateral perspective means that the president can act alone when making policy decisions. The unilateral perspective forces the judiciary to react.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Govt Ch 13
    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Govt Ch 13

    Write out your answers and submit them using the Dropbox in a RTF or Word Doc format. Presidential Power and Iraq This exercise relates to the Policy Debate in Chapter 13 dealing with Iraq and Presidential Power. The goal of this exercise is to give you a better understanding of recent Supreme Court rulings on the limits of Presidential power during wartime and the importance of Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. The Constitution (as interpreted by the Supreme Court) balances the need for security against the need for freedom and human rights. You will read and discuss two articles from the Christian Science Monitor, the goal of which will give you a better understanding of the limits on Presidential power and the importance of freedom.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Weak At Home Strong Abroad Analysis
    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Weak At Home Strong Abroad Analysis

    Although only Congress has the right to authorise the use of the armed forces, if the president acts there is little Congress can do to restrain him.This is a power given to the President domestically, executing the power on an international scale gives the President a powerful image that asserts his/her dominance. An example would be Franklin Roosevelt. Roosevelt's four terms as president were marked by two of the largest threats to America; the Great Depression and World War II. The role President Roosevelt played during World War II showed complete dominance at an international scale, he can be seen to be one of the most influential Presidents that America has ever had. Franklin D Roosevelt was given the power to be Commander-In-Chief, as all Presidents do and had became an international figure because of…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    World War II: Article Analysis
    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II: Article Analysis

    Carter quotes,” In his original veto message, President Nixon asserted that he had no choice but to reject the Resolution because it was "clearly unconstitutional.””. President Nixon has a point in which he says that he shouldn’t even be following the resolution if the constitution already provides enough power through all this. Limiting the the presidents power is not necessary one bit, the position of President wouldn’t be needed or it would just become obsolete if they didn’t have the power to perform whatever they wanted that they believed would help. Even chairman Tom Connaly disagrees,"Do you think I'll have to ask Congress for a declaration of war if I decide to send American forces into Korea?" the President asked?"If a burglar breaks into your house," I said, "you can shoot at him without going down to the police station and getting permission. . . . You have the right to do it as commander-in-chief and under the UN Charter.". [25](fed-soc.org) The point that Conally was trying to bring across is that as a president, the ability to wage in combat should be under their choice, they are the ones voted for to provide for whats best for the citizens either way.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Iraq War
    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Iraq War

    The president can use military power as he decides is essential and proper to shield national security and authorize all relevant United Nations Security chamber resolutions to use force. Before starting war, under obligations Bush had to make accessible to Congress his assurance of circumstances. Indeed, under requirements he had to prove that Iraq was infringing upon UN resolutions by yet being in control of weapons of mass destruction, and furthermore that Iraq was behind the 9-11 assaults. Invading Iraq started before any peaceful resolutions, an alliance between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, and a threat of weapons of mass destruction was proven. In his book, Record emphasizes how the 9/11 Commission reported in 2005 that while there may have been contacts between al Qaeda and the Baathist administration, have seen no proof that these ever formed into a community relationship; nor have we seen confirmation showing that Iraq participated with al Qaeda in creating or completing assaults against the United States” (51). Furthermore, Hussein allowed UN auditors to have access to suspected weapons areas. They reported that there was no proof or conceivable sign of an atomic weapons program in Iraq. Record concludes, Iraq was a choice not because it was a convincing security threat but…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    President Powers Are Too Big
    • 2425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    President Powers Are Too Big

    In the United States our President has many powers that are granted to him when they are elected into office. They have the ability to change the budget, to either cut back on spending, or implement new programs to help their citizens. They can veto a bill that they think is not ready to be made law yet and send it back to congress for further evaluation. They can appoint Supreme Court Justices. They also are the Commander in Chief of all U.S. armies, and they even have the power to send troops over to foreign nations in times of hostility in some circumstances. There are many who believe that the powers of the president are sometimes abused, especially as the Commander in Chief. There have been several instances in our Nation’s history in which the President has been able to wiggle their way around the constitutional limitations that are given of the Commander in Chief. Even though the president is unable to actually declare war he can use his powers to advance a conflict. The article Congressional War Powers, The Commander in Chief and Senator John Mccain describes how this is achieved by stating “Technically only congress has the power to declare war but the President can act unilaterally to repel sudden attacks made on U.S. Soil” (Bowling, 2008, p. 1). Presidents use these executive powers to engage in a conflict that they believe needs to be settled in times of crisis. The Constitution has a system within-it that tries to grant separate but equal powers to all branches of government called checks and balances. Although this system of checks and balances is supposed to be followed, there are ways which certain branches of government can gain more power than others. Often the President is the one who abuses the system, and uses their executive powers for their own advantages. These powers granted to the President have been abused more and more throughout our Nation’s recent history and it needs to…

    • 2425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Presidential Power
    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Presidential Power

    The Constitution clearly gives that power to Congress only. Yet recent presidents have been able to fight wars without Congressional approval. Many people believe that we should go back to the days when the president and congress were more or less equal in power. The President’s veto power is also a powerful weapon. The role of the President is described vaguely in the Constitution, but the executive veto power he possesses is precisely defined in the same document. The President cannot write legislation, he can only sign a bill into law or veto it. When the President veto’s a bill, it is completely done. He doesn’t have line item veto power. Congress gets bills passed if it is preferred by the President. As president, Barack Obama has made a habit of bypassing or ignoring constitutional limitations on his power. A lawsuit has been filed against President Obama over his alleged abuse of executive power. It will focus on how Obama has carried out his health care overhaul. Republicans say the lawsuit is necessary to keep the president in check, after he allegedly exceeded his authority with unilateral changes to the Affordable Care Act. In the U.S., health and social care makes up 8% of the economy so this has made a huge impact on the economy and the lives of Americans. President Obama was heard saying, “That’s the good thing about being president: I can do anything I want.” Although said as a joke, it…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Power Of Presidency
    • 806 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Power Of Presidency

    The power of being president, and all the endless decisions that comes with it. Barack Obama has the final say of the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. These three branches make up America’s politics. Now the president can’t govern a whole country all by himself, he needs help. In irony the president may be called the most powerful man in the world but his politicians also control the outcome of his decisions. The president needs to take into consideration the powers of the other three branches. "A president cannot lead unless he appreciates the perspectives of other elected politicians and accepts their legitimacy." (Bowles) What has Obama been doing with his powers lately?…

    • 806 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics