Preview

National Laws on Terrorism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8763 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
National Laws on Terrorism
Q.1) What are the salient features of the Australian Anti-terrorism Legislation passed in 2004. Explain.
Answer:

Three anti-terrorism bills were enacted in the Australian Parliament in 2004 by a Coalition government with the Labor opposition's support. These were the Anti-terrorism bill, 2004, the Anti-terrorism bill (No 2), 2004 and the Anti-terrorism bill (No 3), 2004.

Anti-terrorism bill, 2004
The Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, introduced the Anti-terrorism bill, 2004 on 31 March. He described it as "a bill to strengthen Australia's counter-terrorism laws in a number of respects – a task made more urgent following the recent tragic terrorist bombings in Spain." He said that Australia's counter-terrorism laws "require review and, where necessary, updating if we are to have a legal framework capable of safeguarding all Australians from the scourge of terrorism."
The provisions of this bill were: * To extend the fixed investigation period (that is, the period for which a suspect can be questioned before being either charged or released) under part 1C of the Crimes Act for investigations into suspected terrorism offences, from four hours to 24 hours. Any such extension would have to be authorised by a magistrate or other judicial officer. * To permit law enforcement agencies to reasonably suspend or delay questioning of a person suspected of committing a terrorism offence to make overseas inquiries to obtain information relevant to that terrorism investigation.
Ruddock said that the government recognised the need to "ensure that appropriate safeguards are put in place to maintain the balance between security and individual rights and freedom." Existing safeguards in part 1C of the Crimes Act continue to apply to terrorist suspects being investigated in accordance with the Crimes Act regime. These safeguards include: * A suspect's right to communicate with a legal practitioner, friend or relative, an interpreter or a consular office * A

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As the world's population grew, so did political and economic instability, as well as major international conflicts. Tensions between countries and cultures tightened, and eventually and inevitably, one of them attacked. This terrorist act brought with it the panic and chaos fuelled haze that was post-911 Australia, and similar to many situations in the past, the fear and vulnerability associated with the community allowed the government quite a substantial amount of political power. This atmosphere of fear and ignorance lead to several incomplete and somewhat extreme pieces of Anti terrorist legislation to be passed by the Howard government, in order to ensure the safety of all Australians, or so they said. Dr Mohammed Haneef a doctor working in Queensland on a skilled migrant visa, soon found himself a victim of these laws. When two Indian men attempted to bomb an airport in Glasgow, UK, Mohammed Haneef became a suspect in the eyes of the Australian Federal Police, and was arrested shortly. Several blunders and misinterpretations by the AFP lead to the wrongful detention and charging of Dr Haneef, a man who spent a total of 12 days in detention without being charged and had his visa unfairly revoked during his trial. Haneef was eventually released and all charges were dropped against him, when the Public Prosecutor determined that there was no legitimate trial against him. However, the course of events that Dr Haneef experienced brought to light the glaring dilemmas associated with Australia's radical Anti Terrorist laws and corresponding government agencies.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The final assignment for this course is a Final Paper. The purpose of the Final Paper is to give you an opportunity to apply much of what you have learned about American national government to an examination of civil liberties in the context of the war on terror. The Final Paper represents 20% of the overall course grade.…

    • 36699 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A law in relation to defence requires a test of proportionality, so that law-making channels are seen as being able to be “reasonably appropriate and adapted to the purpose of defence”[4]. Thus, in attempting to determine the correct application of the defence power in the current political climate, one must contemplate all facts and circumstances surrounding the threat of terrorism before coming to a conclusion. One must also look back through the history of the defence power to decipher the correct proportional means by which it is applied.…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill C-51 Thesis

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page

    Canada is a country is known for its tolerance and its emphasis on individual freedom. Embedded within its constitution is the Charter of Rights and Freedom, which is outlines and enforces the rights many of Canadians. However the increasing frequency in terror attacks such as 911, and more recently the parliament shooting in Ottawa, has given way to the enactment of bill C-51 also known as the Anti-Terrorism Act (Sokolyk, 2015 p. 41). What is Bill C-51, and what are the implications it has in Canadian society? The purpose of this paper is to analyze Bill C-51 and describe the implications it has on Canadian society in terms of establishing criminal offences that infringe upon basic civil liberties. Some may feel that Bill C-51is necessary…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jatta Pros And Cons

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main purpose of the act is to narrow and limit the immunity of foreign states in cases where international terrorism acts might arise.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Public services task 2

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What measures public services have implemented to counter terrorism? What strategies have been put into place eg CONTEST…

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before the attacks on September 11, 2001, the United States’ government was relatively weak in terms of its tactics in response to terrorism. Overall, no matter what people have to say in the country’s defence, the fact is that it was a much easier target compared to how it is today. There were not as many stringent regulations in place that would normally stop potential terrorists from making a move, nor were there any efforts to actually catch them in action right before such a drastic event occurred. But if the country was as protected as it is today, the attacks would not have occurred. And now, the reason there are so many rules and regulations in place is in response to them.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The most significant amendment to the bill was The Patriotic Act of 2001 after the country faced the biggest attack from a foreign terrorist group. The United States Department of Justice announced that it would seek legislation that would give powers to state authorities to protect the homeland from such activities and attacks in the future. The proposed legislation was to give federal authorities the ability to monitor internet use, intercept emails and phone calls as well as wiretapping conversion between citizens and non citizens. The Act would also permit the detention of non citizens who are deemed to be dangerous to the home land (Center for American Progress 2005). This Act is by far one of the most controversial legislation in the history of the Congress. This paper looks to analyze the provisions of the Act as well as the pro and cons that came along.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr Sohail Saleem

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare and contrast the effectiveness of the anti-terrorism laws in relation to Dr Haneef case and the present day implications in society…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Law enforcement response to counter-terrorism fundamentally changed as a result of the unprecedented events of September 11th 2001 in New York and Washington (Kaldas, 2002, p61-62). This essay will examine how law enforcement has evolved in response to the changing nature of terrorism, with an emphasis on how this has impacted Australia. An analysis of arrests and subsequent convictions of terrorist related incidents since 9/11 in Western democracies throughout the world, highlights that law enforcement agencies have demonstrated a significant capacity to respond to the threats of terrorism as they arise. It is imperative for law enforcement to embrace the notion that counter terrorism is the responsibility of all law enforcement officers (O’Hare, 2006, p1). Unequivocally, Police perform a crucial role in counter-terrorism due to police being best placed to prevent and detect the emergence of local terrorist threats, and to respond and investigate local terrorist attacks (Clarke and Newman, 2006, p 9). It is critical that law enforcement continually work on effective strategies, strengthen capabilities, and maintain collaborative workable relationships within the communities they serve. To achieve this outcome, law enforcement needs to continually understand the changing nature of terrorism threats and to treat each and every threat as a crime. Terrorism is a crime, (The Counter-Terrorism White Paper, 2010, p 23) having no like or equal which requires an effective, holistic law enforcement response.…

    • 3281 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the wake of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, Congress sprang into action. Within a month, U.S. lawmakers overwhelmingly approved the USA Patriot Act of 2001, giving law enforcement and intelligence agent's broader authority to fight terrorists operating in the United States.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since terrorism evokes fear through a threat to security the Australian Security Intelligence Agency (ASIO) is an organization that would be directly affected by any legal remedies through legislative amendments to combat terrorism. An important legal response to terrorism has been the Anti-terrorism Act (Cth) 2005. The origins of this legislation began in 2002 when John Howard introduced the Australian Security Intelligence Organization Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Bill 2002. Although, it caused a lot of controversial issues in relation to significant changes to ASIO and police powers that would imperil rule of law and the rights of citizens; it would seem evident that increased powers to law enforcement can only benefit the protection of Australian citizens as seen by further amendments to this bill made in 2003. These amendments included a widen of the definition of terrorist offences and enhancing ASIO Australian Federal Police (AFP) powers in questioning and detaining people in order to engage in an ‘appropriate form of interrogation’ for intelligence gathering on terrorists…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) is the most important law passed after the 9/11 attack. It is so essential because of the fact that it improves inter-agency cooperation for the collection of intelligence andit’s sharing. This barrier being broken down has contributed to a very large extent the protection of the US. Additionally, it appreciates the fact that the advent of technologyensures that our laws are updated and has encouraged better prosecution of suspected terrorists. Lastly, it has strengthened the existing terrorism legislations, reflecting some specific situations that did not exactly exist previously. These are the things that make the PATRIOT Act a great addition to law enforcement.…

    • 783 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    September 11, 2001 marked a catastrophic change not only in American society but in every western state including Canada. The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon have had a ripple effect, spreading to the entire world and terrifying thousands of people. Following these attacks, world populations were devastated and governments faced a never-before seen need to make laws governing this new form of terror. Countries like the United States of America, United Kingdom, and Canada have passed anti-terrorism legislations that define “terrorism” and how to respond and prevent such attacks.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In response to September 11, the United States reshaped its anti-terrorist strategies to prevent future attacks by targeting terrorists, foreign and domestic, known and potential. October 26, 2001 the USA Patriot Act was signed into law, it facilitates the prosecution of terrorists, by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics