Because almost all the relevant information remains classified, it is difficult to assess that claim (Securing Our Liberty, 2013).” The National Security Agency officials, has given the American citizens’ their word, by promising to inform the nation about details of potential terrorist threats or …show more content…
Model citizens should want to cooperate with theses security measures because the government had good intentions; according to American Criminal Law Review, (2015) “And unfortunately, the idea that the government has access to all communications at all times has extended--unfairly--to the investigations of law enforcement agencies that obtain individual warrants, approved by judges, to intercept the communications of suspected criminals." (5) (American Criminal Law Review, (2015).” Therefore, I do not see the purpose of Edward Snowden leaving the country after leaking governmental information because if he felt that these decisions was unfair, unethical and went against the country’s Declaration of Independence, he should have stood his grounds. Mr. Snowden took the coward route because snitched and left. Although, his information appears to be accurate and true, but running from the situation makes his argument less credible. Consequently, if the United States Federal Government were seeking to harm this young man for leaking vital security information to the public and for his betrayal, I would not see a problem for these hunters to find his hide-outs. I do not think that the government wants to retaliate against the former worker. Snowden’s coward behaviors are similar to one’s that is seeking attention and one’s that has other hidden