Preview

Nicholas Barber Freedom Of Speech

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
107 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nicholas Barber Freedom Of Speech
Nicholas Barber believes that we have become too politically correct. He argues that we have become too sensitive and that we censor our right to speak our minds, most commonly known as freedom of speech. I agree with Barber that we have become too politically correct,
People are entitled to one of the rights listed in the first amendment, the freedom of speech. It’s true that some people are hateful but even if we don’t like, agree, or even joke about it we don’t have the right to control them. People are unable to express their thoughts and feelings because they do not want to offend others.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Bill of Rights, Amendment I states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Bill of Rights). These rights were basically protecting what people say, and write, however, we are slowly loosing those rights. We have to worry now about offending someone because of our language, or saying something that is considered politically incorrect. A quote that has made a big difference in my perception when dealing with people is “You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”. (Lydgate) As I grow older, I see this to be so true. If you look around, you see people being offended more and more. When you please one group, then another group will be offended. There is no way to please everyone, even with claiming terms are politically correct/incorrect. We are in a vicious cycle of using a word in the proper context, it being misused, being changed to a politically correct word, then the word being misused again.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Everyone has a freedom of speech, but others should not try to stop others from exercising their rights. A person can’t say the other is wrong or fight a person to join their side or that their side is right. A person can try to use facts and try to educate a person of their viewpoint. People are not entitled to have their viewpoints be received by people. A person does not have to agree with you on your viewpoint. You can’t change a viewpoint of another. People have their own ways of…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is hard to go one day without seeing some form of hate speech. I see examples of it on social media platforms on a daily basis. People do not think about the negative effects that occurs because of what they said. Moreover, the people who face hate speech may feel angered or frustrated enough that they, too, perpetuate hate speech. People do not care to listen to those who claim hate speech is an issue because they think that the 1st Amendment gives them the right to say anything they want without consequences. The freedom of speech does not mean that you should say negative things to those of a different race or religion.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom of Speech: “I will respect the right of others to express themselves as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States.” As Wikipedia describes Freedom of Speech, “Freedom of speech is the right to communicate one's opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship.” To make it simple, you have the right to say anything that you want unless it is to excessive. To say what you want doesn’t give the right to say inappropriate things about someone, or something. Even though…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Overall, as Roger Rosenblatt stated and explained in his article defending the freedom of speech, the United States must not procreate censorship of any greater extent on its citizen’s voices. In fact, “The Founding Fathers…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limitations on freedoms of society are crucial, especially in America. As Roger Rosenblatt noted in his essay, “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid and Dead,” many people express their freedom of speech in very offensive and controversial ways. Often their expressions violate other amendments and freedoms as well.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone has the right to publicly express their thoughts verbally or in print as long as it does not pose a threat to other people…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People should have freedom to say what they want to say, for what they believe in.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ellen Goodman Hate Speech

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is a fine line in what is considered freedom of speech and what impedes on another person’s freedom. In fact John Stuart Mill states in his book On Liberty, “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (1978, 9). The use of hate speech has a strong impact, especially in minority groups where the support system is not very strong. One example hate speech being persecuted is in an article from the website Grapevine titled Ten Charged with Hate Speech Towards LGBT Community. While some individuals may argue that the freedom of speech is the right of all Americans, there are definitely limits when it comes to the hatred and harassment of a particular group. The law enacted which included sexual orientation in the group where hate speech is not allowed stemmed from the fact that the suicide rate for LGBT teens is much higher than it is for other teens. The Trevor project found LGBT teens are 4 times more likely to attempt…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People sometimes tell others something that they say is not politically correct and it offends them, but then they refuse to explain what is so terrible and offensive about what the person just said. It is to a point where people seem to be offended by everything. Being too politically correct is hindering societies’ ability to rationally solve problems.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the world in which we live in today, we have many distractions and obstacles that can deter us from the goals and accomplishments that we desire from a young age. At a young age more and more kids are exposed to the harsh realities of the world ranging from the negative words they hear words and even to how they behave and treat their peers in the school systems. With all the technological advances that we have it makes it easier to popularize such words. Hate speech comes from a long history and has been brought into schools which can breed an entire generation to racist actions and ignorance towards specific categories of people. Many groups have been put into place to stop such actions and they try to bring us all together but with all the laws that were made hundreds of years ago it makes it harder and harder to break up and regulate such things as hate speech. WIth the groups that try their best to get rid of hate speech, it brings groups that try to grow hate speech and isolate groups such as the KKk and other supremacist groups. That is why hate speech shouldn’t be allowed and shouldn’t be encouraged.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hate speech is defined as “hostile statements based on someone’s personal characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation (By the People).” Today there are a wide variety of opinions concerning whether or not hate speech should be banned by the government, but because we are given the right to free speech in the First Amendment, banning hate speech could deprive us of our right to speak freely. Hate speech should not be banned by the government.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Hate Speech

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Prior to the 1930’s speech was not as protected as it is today (Bell, 968). This is a freedom that many take for granted or spend very little time thinking about. While it would be easy to say that banning hate speech would clearly take away the freedom of speech, the truth is banning hate speech would actually provide opportunities for more people to enjoy free speech. According to Bell’s article in the Indiana Law Journal, minorities who are subjected to hate speech are more likely to avoid those situations whether it involves their place of work, home or public environment (966). They are not engaging in discussion like opponents of banning hate speech suggest, there is a clear understanding that this situation is not safe and must be avoided. While some would contend that hate speech is simply, spoken words that some find offensive, Stephen Newman, in Liberty, Community and Censorship, describes hate speech as words that heighten prejudice, and intimidate specific people (375). Even the Supreme Court does not always agree on the defining lines of hate speech. Erik Bleich in his article the Rise of Hate Speech lists several court cases that have helped to define the law in regards to hate speech. These cases include Chaplinsky V. New Hampshire, which introduced the term “fighting words”, Biauharnais V. Illinois, this case involved printed materials, and the case quoted in every article RAV v. City of…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell once famously said ‘If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.' This sentence sums up the very essence of free speech; it is, as Orwell believed, the mother of all civil rights. Without the unconditional freedom to offend it cannot exist. Ideas are, more often than not, dangerous things. There is little point in having freedom of speech if it only defends the most popular and innocuous of opinions. The freedom to offend can perpetrate racial, social or religious intolerance; however, conversely, it is also the only means available to fight against such bigotry. Free speech is not something to work towards when the world is ‘better'; it is, rather, the vital tool through which a better world can be built. Absolute free speech is the cornerstone of all civil rights; without it we cannot truly progress.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We have big democracies like Australia, Germany or India, where people by and large take advantage of the certain liberties given to them. Free speech, that comes under the category of freedom of expression and is given to me and mostly all the residents of the democratic countries we have, well I say mostly because, the right to these kind of liberties may be restricted if a person is found guilty of a crime by a court of law. People take undue advantage of this and express their hatred through this medium. Hate speech is speech that offends, threatens, or else insults groups or individuals, based on their race, color, religion, national origin, any disability, or other traits.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays