Preview

Nietzsche On The Genealogy Of Morality Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1284 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nietzsche On The Genealogy Of Morality Summary
Collin Laguzza
Pl215 Ethics
Paper C
12/10/15

Friedrich Nietzsche explores the importance and true value of morality in his work On the Genealogy of Morality. Nietzsche fails to provide a concrete definition of morality however, he instills values and their relations to modern humanity. It has been clear that people do not doubt that good is highest in value compared to evil. Nietzsche questions if the opposite were true. He proposes that what we call good may actually be detrimental to our livelihood and what we call evil is superior in value. Nietzsche claims that in the past, we have taken the worth of values as something that is given. Therefore, the origin of morality, good and evil have to be examined and interpreted in order to determine
…show more content…
This is driven by a strong feeling of resentment as slave morality is much deeper and more refined. Christianity is taken into perspective. According to Nietzsche, Christian love is born from hatred. However, the master morality has the potential to degrade life itself. Today, humans have become accustom to the slave morality. That is most closely associated with the priestly life where the focus is on evil or the afterlife which serves as a distraction from the possibility of enjoying present times and even removing the ability for one to improve upon another. Nietzsche seems to seek a meaning in history when it comes to human life and free will but seems to be trapped in one state of mind, or simply can’t accept to think outside of his realm. Christians are significant because they occur throughout history, and accept that the lives of humans have meaning. They have the ability to freely choose how they live their own individual lives. This freedom is given by God. Nietzsche seems to either ignore this subject, or fails to accept the idea of free will. Without free will, Nietzsche can further enhance his argument regarding the master and slave morality. However, free will must be considered and without this concept, his argument seems to easily fall into place. Free will allows mankind to develop his own direction in life itself through the image of God. Since Nietzsche claims that good and cause evil, and evil can cause good, the distinction can be broken down into choice, and the will of God. Nietzsche however, does not believe that actions or facts alone have been shaped by a higher force. However, was free will a term invented by the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boston Beer

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1a. There are several reasons BBC should focus on the light beer market. It is true that their sales were decreasing from year to year but I think there is nothing wrong with the product itself. The problem is on the marketing and management system. It was proved from the result of the consumer taste survey. Most of people said that lightship beer had better taste, better color and smell compare to Bud light, Coors Light, and Amstel Light and the result stated that lightship beer was in the first place. We got almost the same result from the blind test that is held in several countries including USA and Canada. Another important reason is the demand for the light beer is relative high from the consumers. People said that the advantage of drinking light beer because it contains lower calorie. Based on the field study, light beers accounted for five of the top ten best-selling beers in supermarkets. So, it is very pity if BBC stops producing light beer.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Beyond Good & Evil, Friedrich Nietzsche seeks to develop the idea of moral philosophy beyond basic pleasures, how they relate to the general population, and further into our own personal intricacies and how they create a set of rules that apply to most individuals. Throughout the book, Nietzsche articulate well over 200 epigrams, each of which highlights a different aspect of human morality. Nietzsche’s 68th epigram dictates: “‘I have done that,’ says my memory. ‘I cannot have done that,’ says my pride, and remains inexorable. Eventually--memory yields.” When assessing this aphorism, it is not only important to assess why our memory yields and what ensues as a result, but also what would occur if we didn’t. One could argue that we must remember our mistakes and learn from them and, by choosing to forget our mistakes for our own pride’s sake, we stall our own moral progression. However, it could also be said that forgetting our own mistakes is vital to our moral progression because rather than merely learning from our mistakes, by constantly remembering them, we allow ourselves to be caught in a cycle of guilt, preventing us from truly moving on. Rather than blindly assessing the aphorism on its own, one must look through Nietzsche’s lens regarding the concepts of intention and truth in order to determine which of the above interpretations is more plausible. Although the first notion is a reasonable interpretation of Nietzsche’s epigram regarding widely accepted notions of morality, the second proves to be a more valid conclusion when following Nietzschean philosophy. While the first interpretation allows for moral recognition and awareness, the second allows for actual progress in the individual.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche is a German Philosopher, who studied and written several critical texts. The type of texts he wrote were along the lines of philosophy, religion, contemporary culture, and science. Nietzsche is known for a lot of his work, but master-slave morality is highly valued. Master-slave morality was the first subject in Nietzsche’s book, On the Genealogy of Morality. In this book Nietzsche defines the difference between Slave morality and Master morality. When Nietzsche compares between the two types of morality he distinguish strength versus weakness, the difference is primarily one of power and also love independence. The master knows he has power and abilities to aspire to excellence, also he…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical philosophers of the nineteenth century were less sure that general moral qualities could be maintained. For Marx morality and morals were a piece of middle class philosophy: sets of thoughts that overlooked the exploitative monetary courses of action of society and added to False Consciousness. Nietzsche took a gander at the starting points of morality, and like Marx, saw moral frameworks as emerging from the hobbies of social gatherings. For Nietzsche the individual needed to go past acknowledged morality to make another morality for him. In the twentieth century, there has been developing negativity about the likelihood of a widespread moral framework. Jean-Paul Sartre accentuated the subjective judgments that an individual must make so as to be genuine.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I will begin with the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche whose ideals he defends with the genealogy of morality. In his book Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche is critical of “bad conscience” and considers it to stem from Christianity. Bad conscience as referred by Nietzsche is “the state in which an individual believes they neither deserve a good life nor are they able to create one for themselves.” Nietzsche believes that we shouldn’t focus on one right path to the good life because there isn’t one; everything depends on a person’s willingness to accept their past, embrace their present, and change for their future.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The more powerful, noble men saw themselves as good when they observed the contrast between themselves and those inferior to them: the weak, poor, and common people. Here Nietzsche introduces the contrast between master morality and slave morality and how the first concept of good and bad arose. As I mentioned earlier, the masters, nobles, and stronger people defined good as a reflection of themselves. Now when they came to contact with the weak, the slaves, the poor, and the common people, they attributed the concept of bad to them as the opposite side to what they saw on themselves. Their position of power is what also gave them control over language the power label things such as what is good and what is bad. On the other hand when the weak side came into contact with the nobles, after realizing they were inferior to the nobles, the feeling of ressentiment arose, which as we will later see, rearranged the concept of good and…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: The Federalist Papers influenced the ratification of the Constitution by making some of their most important arguments, including the importance of being in a Union by having a Constitution, answering to the objections made by the Anti-federalists about separation of powers, and defending opposing arguments made against the characteristics of the executive and judicial branch as provided in the Constitution.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche here specifies that his task is not simply to expose the psychological and historical eventuality that make for different moralities, but to question moralities for their objective value. It is exposed how a particular morality comes from a tradition. Nietzsche states how the only thing that matters is their current, actual functional value in objective terms, and their potential functional value. The work can be used to determine whether the values of the road’s protagonist’s actions are subjective, meaning they fit the characters needs. It can also be used to determine if there is any source of absolute morality in the novel.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Of the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche sought to provide context for what he saw as the central value system of the society in which he lived: slave-morality. Nietzsche saw morality as reflective of the conditions in which its proponents were brought up. He saw the roots of slave morality in oppression and slavery, and posits that it grew as a reaction to the morality of the masters of the time. What follows is a simplified account of Nietzsche’s master-slave dichotomy, and what he saw as the dire consequences for human progress should the pervasiveness of slave morality be allowed to remain at the expense of the master. I will argue that although religion and slave morality may have had significant influence in Nietzsche’s day, his fears about the stagnation of mankind through its adherence to slave morality are exaggerated and largely unfounded. I will also briefly discuss the applicability of slave-master morality to contemporary life.…

    • 2209 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche dismissing punishment as the origin of bad conscience is based on the ideals of a society transitioning from a simplistic, nomadic and barbaric way of life, to a more serene one, with beliefs of settlements and communities. Herein lies the problem Nietzsche discovers, the basic instincts of man, surrounded by the walls of a new society, rendering all the unconscious thoughts that served as a need for survival, useless. This new society would require men to think instead of using instincts; the structure of society would demand this reliance of our conscious mind.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first morality Nietzsche writes about is the master morality. Nietzsche defined master morality as the morality of the strong-willed. For these men the “good” is the noble, strong and powerful, while the “bad” is the weak, cowardly, timid and petty. Master morality begins in the “noble man” with a spontaneous idea of the “good”, then the idea of “bad” develops in opposition to it (On the Genealogy of Morals). He stated: “The noble type of man experiences itself as determining values; it does not need approval; it judges, what is harmful to me is harmful in itself”; it knows itself to be that which first accords honor to things; it is value-creating” (Beyond Good and Evil).…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Some moralities are more suitable for subordinate roles; some are more appropriate for dominating and leading social roles. What counts as a preferable and legitimate action depends upon the kind of person one is. The deciding factor is whether one is weaker, sicker and on the decline, or whether one is healthier, more powerful and overflowing with life” (Brandhorst, M. (2010). Naturalism and the Genealogy of Moral Institutions: Journal of Nietzsche Studies. Issue 40, p 5-28, 16p).…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nietzsche: the Conscience

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In his second essay of the Geneaology of Morals, Nietzsche attempts to identify and explain the origin of the conscience. He does not adopt the view of the conscience that is accepted by the “English Psychologists”, such as Bentham, J. Mill, J.S. Mill and Hume, as the result of an innate moral feeling. Rather, it is his belief that the moral content of our conscience is formed during childhood under the influence of society. Nietzsche defines the conscience as an introspective phenomenon brought about by a feeling of responsibility, in which one analyzes their own morality due to the internalization of the values of society. This definition holds the position that the conscience is not something innate to humans, rather it has arisen through evolution. In light of this, this paper will give insight into how Nietzsche reaches this conclusion, as well as what results from it. In order to do this there will be discussion of guilt, punishment, the will to power and implications from society.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Nietzsche’s First Essay in “Genealogy of Morals,” he analyzes the history and evolution behind the meanings of “good” and “bad” and, later, “good” and “evil.” He begins by recognizing that, originally, goodness was determined by the “noble, powerful [and] high-stationed” elites, as opposed to who was “bad”—the commoners, the “low-minded…plebeian(s)” (113). This split between both classes creates a “pathos of distance,” where the upper-class seizes the opportunity to “create values and to coin names for values” (113). In other words, what was “good” meant what was characteristic of the higher class, meaning that only the actions the Aristocratic classes qualified as good behavior.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philosophers, however should “not point to this falsification of the truth because no philosopher has yet been confirmed right” and this “truth” can be interpreted as their “prejudice” (Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, 1886, 27). Later in the Chapter Nietzsche gives a overview of stages of morality in human history: the pre-moral period, in which only the consequences of action matters, the moral where the focus is on the origin rather than the consequences of action. Eventually, Extra-moral it the last stage and looks at the intention of an individual’s action. If individuals recognize these drivers that shape human action, they can overcome the restrictive characters of morality (Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, 1886, 32,33). At the end of the chapter The Free Spirit, Nietzsche predicts that free spirit is possible but he also describes the challenges (human instincts and intentions) to his vision of free spirit among a new generation of philosophers (Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, 1886,…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays