Preview

Nietzsche Slave Morality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
487 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nietzsche Slave Morality
Nietzsche argues master and slave morality to differentiate between “good” and “bad”. Since there is “good” and “bad”, there is punishment in relative to that relationship which is also explained by Nietzsche. This essay is a reconstruction of slave’s morality and its relation to Nietzsche’s ideas of punishment. Also, there will be an alternative strategy for punishment mention by consulting what is the good in life.
In Nietzsche’s first essay, he discusses the difference between “good” and “evil” with master’s and slave’s morality. Nietzsche explains that master’s morality is when the masters believe they are “good” and slave’s morality is when the slaves believe they are “good”. Nietzsche refers to the slaves as Jews or priests because they
…show more content…
Nietzsche clarifies that we punish for justification, out of bad conscious, and to gain power and control. Nietzsche justifies that it is in our own nature to go against our nature. Therefore, it is in the slave’s nature to become cruel like the masters. Slaves have been mistreated by the masters, thus creating resentment, also known as Nietzsche’s slave revolt argument. Resentment is used as a punishment to impose guilt, shame, and dishonor on the masters. The slaves simply do not wish to become similar to masters because they consider masters hostile and therefore bad. Since slave’s true nature is not true nature, they accomplish freedom: idea with a promise. The justice in slave’s morality is what doesn’t kill us makes us harder, emotionally. Thus, resulting in the no punishment for the master’s previous behavior but educating the masters. The master’s turn “good” when they follow the “inevitably the ancestor himself...transfigured into a god…here the actual origin of gods, an origin, then, [live] in fear! (61). This quote explains how the masters will live in fear of the gods and do “good”.
How can punishment be abolished when someone is considered “bad”? Since punishment is said to be “bad” in terms of Nietzsche’s slave’s morality, an alternative is the system of moral beliefs. People act in terms of beliefs, thus trying to become “good” in God’s eyes. The belief in whether the afterlife continues in Heaven or Hell influences people’s actions, therefore people will act in accordance with a “good”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    With regards to religion, many slave owners, such as, Zephaniah Kingsley and Judge Wilkerson believed that religious expressions were a form of independence and would threaten slave control. They believed that their slaves’ would become more empowered and have more bravery and be more difficult to handle and more disobedient. However, other slave owners believed that it should be used as an instrument of control. When slaves were actually able to attend Christian services, it was by a white minister who taught them to obey their masters in order to be saved by God. However, if they disobeyed them, they would not be saved, but destined for damnation.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the narrative of The Life of Frederick Douglass Slave, an American Slave, by Frederick Douglass slave owners rely on the dehumanization of slaves and revoke fundamental human rights in order to prevent slaves from rebelling which in turn allows the institution of slavery to continue. In order for the institution of slavery to continue all of the following participants need to perform their assigned roles. Traditionally, the slave master using violence and poor treatment to get his slave to obey his orders and as a result the slave obeys his master’s orders. However, when a slave does not perform his role and starts to rebel this threatens the authority of the master and weakens his role. When a slave rebels this poses great conflict…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Beyond Good & Evil, Friedrich Nietzsche seeks to develop the idea of moral philosophy beyond basic pleasures, how they relate to the general population, and further into our own personal intricacies and how they create a set of rules that apply to most individuals. Throughout the book, Nietzsche articulate well over 200 epigrams, each of which highlights a different aspect of human morality. Nietzsche’s 68th epigram dictates: “‘I have done that,’ says my memory. ‘I cannot have done that,’ says my pride, and remains inexorable. Eventually--memory yields.” When assessing this aphorism, it is not only important to assess why our memory yields and what ensues as a result, but also what would occur if we didn’t. One could argue that we must remember our mistakes and learn from them and, by choosing to forget our mistakes for our own pride’s sake, we stall our own moral progression. However, it could also be said that forgetting our own mistakes is vital to our moral progression because rather than merely learning from our mistakes, by constantly remembering them, we allow ourselves to be caught in a cycle of guilt, preventing us from truly moving on. Rather than blindly assessing the aphorism on its own, one must look through Nietzsche’s lens regarding the concepts of intention and truth in order to determine which of the above interpretations is more plausible. Although the first notion is a reasonable interpretation of Nietzsche’s epigram regarding widely accepted notions of morality, the second proves to be a more valid conclusion when following Nietzschean philosophy. While the first interpretation allows for moral recognition and awareness, the second allows for actual progress in the individual.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most slaves did not attempt to escape slavery because they relied too much on their master and thought of them as a father figure. For example, the master supplied them with shelter, food, and a job, which they thought was all they could get. They also believed everything that the whites preached to them, because they did not know any better. On the other hand, masters frightened their slaves because they would be abused if they did not work hard enough. Many slave owners also did not allow slaves to pray. If slaves did hear a preacher, it was a message that they had to obey their masters, and that they should think of themselves as the equal of other animals, and not humans who could go to heaven. “‘Now I takes my text, which is, Nigger obey your master and your mistress, ‘cause what you git from them here in this world am all you ever going to git, ‘cause you just like the hogs and the other animals-when you dies you ain’t no more, after you been throwed in that hole.’” The slaves could, and wanted to outsmart their masters and came up with interesting ways to trick them to receive more food or escape overwork. An example of this would be a story told by a slave about a partridge tricking a fox to acquire all the food. This story is an example of how the slaves would trick their master to receive more food. Another example would be a story about when a group of slaves fooled their master to attain good meat instead of diseased meat. Additionally a group of slaves dug their master a deep grave when he died so that he could be closer to hell. Finally, a story is written about a slave insulting his master, and calling him a jackass. The slaves’ hatred toward their master indicates that their way of life was…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maxims used by slaves, gave them hope for the future. They looked for things to better daily life, they looked for a source of hope; one of these sources was God. Douglass states that, “The good spirit was from God, and to him I offer thanks and praise.” (Page 273) God was especially important throughout daily tasks of slave life because God helped give slaves something to look forward to. Slaves believed that all of the suffering they endured was for a purpose and that it wasn’t going un-noticed. They believed God justified all of this and that he would make it right in the end. Yet, before they could reach God, slaves still had to put up with a gruesome slave life.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Douglass shows how slavery turns people who are good and kind, into things of pure evil. Douglass shows in his book how slavery is corrupting and changes people, and he shows this through Master Hugh’s wife, Mrs. Auld. Mrs. Auld was a woman who “never had a slave under her control previously to [Douglass],” and “[Douglass] was utterly astonished at her goodness.”(Douglass 19) Douglass shows how she was pure and had a good heart that was in the right place and Douglass compares her to an angel, but the “fatal poison” of slavery was “in her hands,” and she soon her “cheerful eye” because of the “influence of slavery, soon became red with rage” and her “angelic face gave place to that of a demon.”(Douglass 19) Change was inevitable because of her need to conform to the way people treated slaves. According to her husband the way she treated slaves was “unlawful and unsafe,” (Douglass 20) and she needed to treat them like others treat slaves, which she did. She went against her beliefs, and “[conformed] to the patterns of [the] world” (Niv Bible, Rom. 12:2) and treated slaves like dirt. She was transformed into something different once she tasted of that poisoned apple that is slavery, and turned from who she was, a good person, into some new creation of evil, a demon and a devil, which is the image of pure evil and trickery.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suparman suggests, “Enslavement was fundamentally evil on the side of morality. It is a curse to the master and a wrong to the slave, African slaves were trapped in the American enslavement system, which was very different from slavery in other societies. ”(Suparman 153). These slaves were often away from other family members as it provided slaveowners improvement in their financial situation; Enslaved people could not defend themselves from the violence of the slaveowners and in a legal situation could not testify to these acts of violence unless it was against a fellow slave or free black person. Slaves were punished for several reasons, including if found not to be working fast enough, being late to jobs for whatever reason, disobedience, or even worse, being seen trying to escape; these punishments were performed in different forms, from whipping to imprisonment, sometimes these punishments were so extreme it led to death, Suparman adds to this idea stating, “The slaveholders thought that it was very easy to kill the…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The more powerful, noble men saw themselves as good when they observed the contrast between themselves and those inferior to them: the weak, poor, and common people. Here Nietzsche introduces the contrast between master morality and slave morality and how the first concept of good and bad arose. As I mentioned earlier, the masters, nobles, and stronger people defined good as a reflection of themselves. Now when they came to contact with the weak, the slaves, the poor, and the common people, they attributed the concept of bad to them as the opposite side to what they saw on themselves. Their position of power is what also gave them control over language the power label things such as what is good and what is bad. On the other hand when the weak side came into contact with the nobles, after realizing they were inferior to the nobles, the feeling of ressentiment arose, which as we will later see, rearranged the concept of good and…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slaves masters would use violence to not only keep the slaves in line but to motive them to work harder. Violence did not only effect the slaves physically it affected them psychologically. Slave masters would use all sort of methods to break slaves to make them more submissive. Slaves would have to witness others slaves get beaten to frighten other slaves for committing the same offence as the slave being beaten. Slaves would have watched as their family member and/or other slaves’ family member be separated like in the book where Eliza was torn away from her children. In the book Solomon mentions that after Eliza’s children were taken away from her how she became “shell of a woman she once was”. Some slaves if they were female had to live in fear of being raped by the slave master. We see this in the beginning of the book with Eliza’s daughter who was not sold with her mother because Theophilus Freeman want to keep her until she was presumably of child bearing age and to sell her to the highest bidder where she would likely be raped. In the book, we also see where Patsy is repeatedly raped by Master Epps and not only did she suffer from the rapes. Not only did Patsy had to endure though Master Ford raping her she also had to deal with the jealousy of the Epps’s wife. Having living in that sort of environment, would have the slaves too terrified to disobey. Even though violence kept slaves to afraid to go against their slave master, slave masters us religion as well to keep slaves in…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southern Slavery Essay

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In short, southerners were violating the biblical model of slavery in four major ways. These violations include not legally permitting southern slave masters to manumit their African slaves, legally enabling southern slave masters to murder their African slaves and face no punishment, legally enabling southern slave masters to punish and murder their fugitive slaves, and finally by basing their system of slavery upon the inferiority of the African race. After doing all of the above, this chapter will finally address and explain the implications of the conclusion of this thesis upon future studies of the antebellum, biblical slavery…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defending Slavery

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages

    This paper will summarize the first part of book taking as a main topic racial aspects of the slavery. After the introductory summary , this paper will focus in two specific sections found in the second part of the book: “Religion and Slavery” and “Racial Theory and Slavery”.…

    • 2485 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nietzsche believes that his master-slave morality implements the basis of all critical explanation or interpretation of Western thought. According to Nietzsche’s master-slave morality, “Slave Morality” values kindness, humility, and sympathy. Unlike “Master Morality” that values pride, strength, and nobility. This is somewhat similar to Hegel’s interpretation of the Master-Slave relationship due to the way each of the philosophers portray the master and slaves way of thinking. On the other hand, Hegel does not support universal morality unlike Nietzsche. Nietzsche is more open to a different perspective on freedom of one’s self. Hegel believes the master and the slave each play a certain role within society and they will forever be stuck within that role.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dehumanizing Slaves

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Every human being should be given the right to an education, love and the pursuit of happiness. A slave is a human. Therefore, the pilfering of a human’s right through the force of human cruelty is an act of dehumanization for the purpose of ownership and free labor. The act of dehumanizing a slave is a slave master’s desire. A slave master needs control over the mind of the enslaved in order to gain free employment. Slavery is a dehumanizing institution. Slaves are captured, beaten, tortured and traumatize for the purpose of free labor. The intention of dehumanizing a slave is to control, manipulate, and force the intelligence of a person into bondage.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment is described by the Webster Dictionary as ‘the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution to an offense’. Today, this definition may pass as true for many governments, but years ago when philosophers were discussing ideas about government and laws, one idea that stuck out was that of punishment. Different theories rose regarding justifying punishment, and deciding the purpose behind punishing people. Joel Feinberg, Jules Coleman, and Christopher Kutz are three philosophers that spent a lot of time discussing their beliefs and ideas about punishment.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nietzsche seems to place a much higher value on a man that breaks free of society, and says the "followers" shape everything in society to work against this man,“[m]oral judgments and condemnations constitute the favorite revenge of the spiritually limited against those less limited” (BGE 219), and he claims that the “chief means” by which the “weak and mediocre…weaken and pull down the stronger” is “the moral judgment”. To better understand this you could say, that the Government (the weak willed) put restrictions on citizens to get them to conform to societal norms. The goal of this is to weaken the citizens and prevent them from rising above the government. 
In the example I used above I would argue to Nietzsche that in rising above this weak willed government in order to become a strong willed person, could mean i am breaking laws and harming others in order to fit in the master morality category. How would he explain criminals who "break free of…

    • 400 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays