In Nietzsche’s first essay, he discusses the difference between “good” and “evil” with master’s and slave’s morality. Nietzsche explains that master’s morality is when the masters believe they are “good” and slave’s morality is when the slaves believe they are “good”. Nietzsche refers to the slaves as Jews or priests because they …show more content…
Nietzsche clarifies that we punish for justification, out of bad conscious, and to gain power and control. Nietzsche justifies that it is in our own nature to go against our nature. Therefore, it is in the slave’s nature to become cruel like the masters. Slaves have been mistreated by the masters, thus creating resentment, also known as Nietzsche’s slave revolt argument. Resentment is used as a punishment to impose guilt, shame, and dishonor on the masters. The slaves simply do not wish to become similar to masters because they consider masters hostile and therefore bad. Since slave’s true nature is not true nature, they accomplish freedom: idea with a promise. The justice in slave’s morality is what doesn’t kill us makes us harder, emotionally. Thus, resulting in the no punishment for the master’s previous behavior but educating the masters. The master’s turn “good” when they follow the “inevitably the ancestor himself...transfigured into a god…here the actual origin of gods, an origin, then, [live] in fear! (61). This quote explains how the masters will live in fear of the gods and do “good”.
How can punishment be abolished when someone is considered “bad”? Since punishment is said to be “bad” in terms of Nietzsche’s slave’s morality, an alternative is the system of moral beliefs. People act in terms of beliefs, thus trying to become “good” in God’s eyes. The belief in whether the afterlife continues in Heaven or Hell influences people’s actions, therefore people will act in accordance with a “good”