Nietzsche Slave Morality Analysis

Since the time that animals have walked among land, and fish have swum in the sea’s depths, there has been a natural battle of superiority throughout the world. It has been recognized in species versus other species, or species versus their own species. No matter where you look, there is always someone or something, fighting to progress to the top. In the early development of modern humans, their ways of showing dominance were very similar to other animals, as they had only recently evolved from them. Therefore, these early humans would show their dominance via attacks, stealing foods, or even killing other humans or animals. However, as these displays of dominance have become less common, humans have instead discovered other ways to intimidate
He does, however, believe that there are two different sets of morals that are directly controversy to the other. He titles these two morals as the “slave morality” and the “noble morality.” In On the Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche claims that when you have noble morality, slave morality quickly follows as a form of “ressentiment,” his spelling of the word resentment. Therefore, according to Nietzsche, when there is a noble morality, which he describes as “The capacity for and duty of long drawn-out gratitude and revenge – both within the peer-group only –, finesse in retribution, a refined concept of friendship, a certain need to have enemies (as drainage-channels, as it were, for the emotions envy, quarrelsomeness, arrogance” (Nietzsche 156), a resentment of such people will cause a slave morality. Slave morality, he claims, is “compassion, the obliging helping hand, the warm heart, patience,