Preview

Where Nineteenth-Century Entrepreneurs Robber Barons?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
910 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Where Nineteenth-Century Entrepreneurs Robber Barons?
Were Nineteenth-Century Entrepreneurs Robber Barons? John Tipple "Big Business and a New Economy"� vs. Alfred D. Chandler "The Beginnings of Big Business in American Industry"� Many people wonder if the big businessmen of the late nineteenth century, also known as the "Gilded Age,"� were "Robber Barons."� John Tipple, a professor of history, portrays big businessman of the late nineteenth century as criminal and cheating individuals whose power and greed eroded the nation's image of traditional American values. Tipple views these powerful businessmen as money hungry robbers, known as "Robber Barons."� On the other hand, Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., professor of business history, believes that these American entrepreneurs and their big corporations empowered the country's economy and provided a new beginning for American citizens. Chandler views the operations of entrepreneurs as an important marketing strategy that promotes the expansion of America's urban market.

John Tipple's "Big Businessmen and A New Economy"� states that these big corporation businessmen of the "Gilded Age"� were greedy individuals that dominated the economy and may be referred to as "Robber Barons."� These corrupt businessmen did not care about their consumers or employees. The "Robber Barons"� only cared about how to gain more profit for their corporation. John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie, dominant businessman of the late nineteenth century, monopolized the oil and steel industries. These shrewd businessmen known a "Robber Barons"� made billions of dollars and controlled their industry. Small businesses could not match the low and fixed prices, production rate, and rebates that the large corporations used to control the national urban market. Big corporations overran their efforts to compete.. Tipple saw these ruthless businessmen as dishonest and did not believe in their business techniques.

Andrew Chandler, the author of "The Beginnings of Big Business in American Industry,"� believes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I've never viewed either of these men as bad men or as robber baron, i've always admires the men of the 19th and 20th century who saw these new industries developing and adapted to make a mostly honest profit. These men were friends of consumers because the put pressure on their competitors to provide better goods and services and reasonable prices. They embraces competition, made good products and sold them for low prices. When companies compete the consumer usually…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John D. Rockefeller has earned a spot in the hall of shame. He became wealthy because of ruthless and dishonorable business tactics which then hurt the nation. Rockefeller became wealthy because, he lowered his prices way down and forced the Pennsylvania Railroad to lower their prices, and he also ran smaller companies out of business and then took them over for his own. After he took over most of the smaller businesses, he raised his own prices back up in order to bring in a bigger profit. Rockefeller’s robber baron side was reflected by this action because, he went behind people’s backs and turned the other way when it came to business partners.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morgan,Rockefeller and Carnegie were robber barons They were considered cruel and ruthless. Carnegie made his employees work long hours and gave them little pay he even tried to stop unions in his company. Employees pointed out that Rockefeller could have paid his workers a fairer wage and settled for being a half billionaire. Morgan criticized for creating monopolies by making it difficult for any business to compete against his.…

    • 70 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The industrial capitalists of the late 19th century should be regarded “Robber Barons” for many reasons. One example was with religious places. Money corrupts anyone. Many people think that if they had that much power or money, then they’d only do good with it, and help everyone, but in the end, it corrupts them all. It’s human nature to want power and money and humans do what it takes to do so.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gullman Strike DBQ

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Large businesses would buy out smaller businesses and become even more wealthy and powerful by doing so. This proved to be a drain on the economy. With all competition eliminated, corporations were free to raise prices of their products as far as they wished, and people were forced but, because there were no other options. This served in stretching the gap between poor and rich, much, much wider. As grim as this period may seem, it was not only characterized by people and corporations like the ones mentioned above. Instead of using their wealth or power to gain more, many started to dedicate themselves to philanthropy, especially in the case of Andrew Carnegie who believed that it was the ultimate duty of the rich to give money to the poor and allow them resources that they previously were unable to have, as stated in his article The Gospel of Wealth. (Document E) Carnegie, a billionaire, went on to establish several libraries, schools, colleges, music venues and many other public…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2000 Dbq Analysis

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Carnegie did believe in survival of the fittest and that the rich was more competent and educated than the poor, middle class but, he also believed in aiding the less fortunate in a non-direct way by “ ...bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience and ability to administer,...”(Doc 4). In controlling multiple industries he provided the less fortunate with jobs and work experience, bettering them in a non-direct way. John D. Rockefeller on the other hand believed in boosting himself using horizontal integration, monopolizing the smaller businesses, expanding his industry further and further. Rockefeller once had monopolized almost 90% of the oil and oil refining businesses. He lowered his prices to attract a customer base slowly eliminating all of his competitors by either buying them out or forcing them out of business, to then jack up his prices once he owned most of the industry. Because of his monopoly in the oil industry he and the railroad tycoon Vanderbilt were in league together giving “discriminating rates” to outside , small business competitors (Doc 7). In 1890 the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed to…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a sense, Vanderbilt and Rockefeller are captains of the industry but only by using a capitalist approach with intensive labor. Using false hopes for the immigrants that wanted a better life. Feeding them lies and poor wages which explains their robber baron intent. These men upon lucky made their wealth. The fact is that these millionaires trapped people into the notion that American dream to work hard and you too can obtain wealth. Understanding that social Darwinism implements the survival of the fittest in social and political stance is basically a one-way streak. People who have the right upbringings and domination over the lower class. Economic divisions are mostly important to wealth and inherited wealth they don’t want to be in the…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    of the time were John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan. The definition of a…

    • 600 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today, we know that John D Rockefeller the founder of Standard Oil company used his power to eliminate his competitors and tried to create a monopoly in oil industry. He made secret rebates with railroad companies, so railroads gave his company a lower rate than his competitors. As a result, he could drive out them from the market. In order to destroy the competitors, he raised prices in the areas with no competition, and lower prices in the areas with competition. His strategies ruined competitors, and made them to sell out or go bankrupt. He was considered a ruthless or tyrant who had a lot of enemies, but it was not considered illegal or unethical to monopolize an industry. I think after his first priority which was making money, he was…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Long hours, dangerous work conditions, and low wages are just a few words to describe the treatment of workers at the turn of the 20th century. This was all in the hands of some powerful industrialist we refer to as "robber barons". There can be no mistaking their motives: wealth. It portrays men like Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, Pullman, Ford and cruel and ruthless businessmen who would stop at nothing to achieve great wealth.They cared little about the lives and treatment of those that worked under them, and reside in their towns. They were in many cases accused of disregard of workers' rights, exploitation of resources, and concentration of wealth. In my perpective, it is true.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I thought that people like Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.p Morgan were all robber barons. Because they would employ people and put them in these unsafe, and unsanitary conditions. Also they made education for immigrants coming in difficult because even though they built libraries and hospitals would the immigrants would be illiterate and not be able to pay for hospital bills. Lastly theses men were robber barons because they were using vertical integration and horizontal integration to take over small businesses and to raise prices on railroads.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are Robber Barons a plus or a minus to the world back during the 1800’s? The Robber Barons used cartels, monopolies, and trusts to put themselves above everybody else. Immigrants coming in to the states were almost immediately thrown into jobs, but also could be let go at a moment’s notice. These Elitists made employees work harder as they sought ways to pay them less. Because they ascribed to the theory of Social Darwinism, if they thought an employee was weak or could not keep up they would simply fire them. After getting rid of an employee they had little cause for concern. These “Fat Cats” could just choose another immigrant from the thousands that were coming into the states to work.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John D. Rockefeller created an oil empire, the Standard Oil Company, in this manner. Rockefeller monopolized the oil market through horizontal consolidation, buying out competitors, or driving competitors out of business by initiating rate wars. His cold-hearted mentality was highlighted when he claimed, “Individualism has gone, never to return.” In his testimony to the United States Industrial Commission, Rockefeller boasted about the “power to give the public improved products at less prices and still make a profit for stockholders”, but failed to recognize that consolidation left the poorer class suddenly unemployed. Many magnates also followed Andrew Carnegie’s entrepreneurial tactic of vertical consolidation, in which every stage of manufacturing a product was in the hands of a single corporation. According to James B. Weaver, such schemes allowed trusts to “control the articles which the plain people consume in their daily life.” The American people were forced to cope with the sugar trust, the leather trust, the harvester trust, the tobacco trust, and Rockefeller’s dominant Standard Oil trust. Along with the development of trusts, the invention of machinery allowed rich industrialists to hire less workers for lower wages. By cutting employees and saving money, the corrupt barons were…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They created so many job opportunities, built industries that benefited the whole country and gave away much of their hard earned money. Capitalists of the nineteenth century may have been considered robber barons but they were for the most part captains of industry. The American Industrial Revolution fundamentally changed politics, society, and the economy. Factory workers and consumerism had changed immensely in the Gilded Age; about 400,000 patents were made between 1875 and 1900 which signifies the departure of farming to the vast significance of industries. Trade Unions became an immense part in Urban communities since the people longed for shorter hours and higher pay rates.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History Notes

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Robber Barons - an unscrupulous plutocrat, esp. an American capitalist who acquired a fortune in the late nineteenth century by ruthless means.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays