Preview

North and South advantages and disadvantage during the American Civil War

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
751 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
North and South advantages and disadvantage during the American Civil War
The Civil war was the bloodiest war in American history. The South had many advantages at the beginning of the war but they were short term advantages. The South relied heavily on trade from the North but didn't realize it until the North stopped buying their cotton. The North had population and industry on their side of the war. The problem with the North is that not all northerners wanted to go to war. The reason the south took four years for the North to win, among other reasons, is because they had cautious generals. The Northern generals took fewer chances and gave the south too much credit.

The North had many advantages that helped them win the war. They had production on their side. The Northerners were able to manufacture their own guns,

clothes, cannons, shoes, etc. The North also had railroads on their side. They were able to transport supplies and reinforcements directly to the field. Unlike the South, the North had a navy. This caused the North to set up a blockade around the South. The blockade prevented the South from trading their cotton so it was useless. The North also had a great population advantage. Many immigrants that came to America fought for the North.

In some cases they came right off the boat and went to the battlefield. The North also had a strong central government in place. They had their forces organized and united. They attacked using a two fronted strategy. They took the Mississippi river and attacked from the west and north. President Lincoln controlled the Border States' elections. He made sure that they stayed with the Union. A big disadvantage that the North had was that many Northerners did not want to go to war. They thought that the Civil war was unnecessary and they wanted to let the South leave in peace.

The Southerners had many advantages early in the war. The biggest contributions to the Southern cause were the generals. The South had generals Yates and Lee. They were both respected generals and experienced from the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The South did have some advantages though. Several Indian tribes joined the Confederacy, and the Union troops would have to move in and conquer the land, then force it to be a part of the Union again. They also had more talented military leaders than the North. But the North had more men, most of the railroads, and they controlled the sea. The government of the North was well established, and functioned with little difficulty in comparison to the new and hastily made government in the South. Both sides had disadvantages as well. The South began to run out of supplies, they did not have a major transportation system, and they had a weak economy. Some of their troops refused to fight outside their own states. The North’s disadvantages were the men being unprepared for military life, and poor choice of commanders.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The north relied heavily on industry and commerce, while the south relied heavily on plantations and agriculture. They were also seeing completely different views on the subject of slavery. Three big causes of the Civil War were that of states vs. federal rights, slavery within territories, and the abolition movement.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North won the Civil War due to their effective economic system which allowed them…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking back at the civil war, it is pretty obvious that the North had the upper hand. After all, they won the Civil War. One of the most significant advantages that the Union possessed was better technology than the South. The use of technology played a great role in the Union’s victory. A few of these advantages were the construction of railroads, more artillery, and the use of pontoon bridges.…

    • 376 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3.Due to the substantial differences between the North’s industrial economy and the South’s agricultural economy they both had distinct advantages and disadvantages during the war. To begin with, the North’s economy was far superior to the South’s because the North had two-thirds of the nation’s population, two-thirds of the railroad mileage, and almost 90% of the nation’s industrial output. Also, many of the North’s arm factories were equipped with mass production which allowed them to compete with the gun manufacturing centers and armories of the South. The Northern economy helped them have much greater supply of resources compared to the South. On the other hand, the Confederacy had slaves which helped provide food for the army and provide the most important good of all, cotton. The South was able to use cotton as diplomatic weapon which they thought they could use to persuade France or Britain to assist or side with the Confederacy. We can also see this as a disadvantage to the Northern economy because they had no such tool or weapon to use to obtain foreign assistance or aid. Unfortunately this same advantage for the South also led to a severe disadvantage. Because the majority of the people living in the South did not own slaves, they were not the ones producing cotton. This meant that the majority of the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One factor that had the greatest impact in driving the country in war was the economic difference. The North and the South had different opinion and beliefs making them divide as a region. The Invention of cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1793 made gathering cotton possible. This caused an increase in plantations to grow cotton which caused the great need for cheap labor. It meant that slaves were the cheap labor to get the work done. The southern economy became dependent on slavery and cotton. While in the northern states it was established on industry. North was purchasing raw cotton and turning it into finished goods. In the North people had to work together it didn't matter about their culture or class they were but rather had to put their…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North had advantages during the civil war because they had more railroad tracks to transport things. They used railroad tracks a lot because they need to get food and uniforms to the soldiers. Also so they could get places faster and try to beat the south there and scope out the area. They also have a population of 22 million people that either help someway…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Few advantages in the South were able to fight on it large homeland, they had best military leaders, they encouraged young males to serve in the army and military school. They even export cotton, rice, sugar cane and tobacco for the money. The North held many advantages over the South, there were more resource and population. The Northern states had a twenty-two million of the…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time. Time was the key reason for the North's victory and was achieved through a combination of the first and second reasons. As the war progressed the Union's blockade, largely a paper tiger at the beginning due to the fact that the Navy didn't have enough ships to properly enforce it, became a real blockade that slowly strangled the Confederacy to death. And as the war progressed the South, even before the end of the prisoner exchange, was losing men it could not afford to lose to attrition. Supplies and transportation of supplies. As stated in the first reason, the North was less dependant on Europe than the South was for supplies. There should be little doubt that the South was able to manufacture supplies needed to fight the war, but never in amounts it needed. Industry in the North was a bit larger than it was in the South and was thus able to out produce that of the South. But being able to out produce the South was all well and good unless the South could get the supplies to its troops in the field faster. It then became important to capture major railroad junctions and thus cut off the South's ability to move supplies in a timely…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The loss of the South in the Civil War was the result of various contributions. First of all, they were underequipped in artillery and production factories. The South’s population was about one fourth of the North’s excluding slaves. They were not united and lost because their own philosophical beliefs that destroyed them. Further, the South was underequipped and outclassed in everything industrially. They’re only hope of taking a military advantage was support from European countries. However, those connections were cut when the North blockaded the South and when the North incited the European public to support the North’s effort preventing European interference. Although there was a high morale to serving the Confederacy and to destroying the Union cause, they didn’t have the materials to do so. Many would just fight with stones or any primitive makeshift weapon they could use when they were depleted of bullets because of their low artillery production. The South also had much less supply lines. Their railroads were half that of the North’s and became less as the North decimated the South’s rail lines. The North figured that it would be wiser to destroy their supply lines and weaken the troops. However destroying food lines wouldn’t be a problem because the South couldn’t even supply food because as men were drafted into the army, the agricultural farms withered away due to lack of maintenance. Another disadvantage would be the size of the South. The ratio of people of South to North was about 3 to 7. However 3.5 million of those Southern people were slaves, so the actual ratio would be about 1 to 4. Considering the North’s territorial advantage over the South, it is impressive to see that the South could sustain such a defense over the four years of the war. The reason could be that the South had better trained generals such as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Do People Push West

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why and how the North have the advantage in the Civil War? The North had an advantage over the South in many fields, including its population, industrial and agricultural capacity, and transportation network. Half of the men of military age fought for the Union in the North, around 2.1 million were supplemented by Irish, German immigrants and African Americans who most of them were ex-slaves from the South. In the South, 90 percent of the men eligible to fight and fought for the Confederacy in the South were around 900000.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Union had a huge advantage over the Confederacy in terms of resources. Not only did the North have a larger population than the South, but they also had a navy, a national army, and vast transportation systems to utilize during the war (Goldberg, 406-07). The Union also operated many manufacturing and industrial plants that could produce weapons and other products of war (Goldberg, 407).…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to win the war, the Union had to think smart and play it to their advantage. In the book The Civil War: A Visual History, author John E. Stanchak declared, “During the 19th century, the new era of rail and steam that marked the Industrial Revolution was centered in the Northern states, and a summary of economics and human resources shows their advantages” (Stanchak 54). The North had a lot of railroads which helped them travel faster. They also had more money and organizations than the South. These advantages boosted them further into victory.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North won the Civil War because they had many advantages including a large population, more advanced transportation, and a better war strategy. “It could draw soldiers and workers from a population of 22 million, compared with the South’s 5.5 million” (William Deverell and Deborah Gray White, United States History: Independence to 1914, California Edition, pp. 474-5). A larger population meant more people to fight in the war, which gave the Union a better chance of winning. On the other hand, the South approximately had one-fourth of the North’s population, and as a result they lost the war.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Northern states, also known as the Union, had a very strong economy based on agriculture, industry, and free labor. They were independent and did not have to rely on the South for any of their goods or products. They also favored federal spending on internal improvements and wanted high tariffs. Their views on the way the country should be run included slavery as illegal. As a result of winning the 1860…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays