Preview

Nuremberg Trials

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2619 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuremberg Trials
Where Nazi officials judged fairly during the Nuremburg Trails that followed World War II?
Twenty-four major political and military leaders of Nazi Germany, indicted for aggressive war, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Of the twenty-four twenty-one were taken into custody and put on trial; these were known as the Nuremberg Trials. These trials started on November 20th 1945 and were the first ever war crime tribunal. The Trials were held by the Allied forces of World War II and were held in the city of Nuremberg in Bavaria Germany out of the Palace of Justice. Accusations placed against them were for their involvement in the Nazi Party during World War II. Nazi officials were judged unfairly during the Nuremburg Trails for a continent wide genocide that occurred within WWII and the world watched as Nazi officials got what they deserved.
Lead by Adolf Hitler the Third Riech, the government in Germany at the time, adopted policies of aggressive war and persecuted minorities. Hitler started a Europe wide systematic killing of approximately six million Jews called the Holocaust. “Holocaust” is a word of Greek origin meaning “sacrifice by fire”. (USHMM). The Nazis, who came into power in Germany in 1933, believed that Germans were the superior race and deemed all others inferior, mainly the Jews, and viewed them as a threat to the community. Nearly two out of three Jews that lived in Europe at the time lost their lives due to the systematic killing. (USHMM). After establishing concentration camps to detain political and people of importance in opposing forces, Germany’s SS and police officials detained Jews and other victims of ethnic and racial hatred in these camps. The idea was to concentrate and monitor the Jewish population and also to make later deportation of the Jews easier. These camps changed into labor camps and eventually assisted in the systematic killing. Germany invaded territories and began to expand early into Hitler’s reign, such as



Cited: De Nevers, Renée. "Modernizing the Geneva Conventions." The Washington Quarterly 29.2 (2006): 99-113. Project MUSE. Web. <http://ezproxy.middlesexcc.edu:2748/journals/washington_quarterly/v029/29.2denevers.html>. Haberer, E. "History and Justice: Paradigms of the Prosecution of Nazi Crimes." Holocaust and Genocide Studies 19.3 (2005): 487-519. Project MUSE. Web. <http://ezproxy.middlesexcc.edu:2748/>. James, Missy, and Alan Merickel. Reading Literature and Writing Argument. Boston: Longman, 2011. Print. Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience 245-259 James, Missy, and Alan Merickel. Reading Literature and Writing Argument. Boston: Longman, 2011. Print. James Fenimore Cooper, The Slaughter of the Pigeons. 277-283 Prusin, Alexander V. "Poland 's Nuremberg." The Seven Court Cases of the Supreme National Tribunal, 1946-1948 24.1 (2010): n. pag. Project MUSE. Web. <http://ezproxy.middlesexcc.edu:2748/journals/holocaust_and_genocide_studies/v024/24.1.prusin.html>. The Libary Of Congress. "The Nuremberg Trials." The Nuremberg Trials. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Dec. 2012. <http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/Nuremberg_trials.html>. "The Nuremberg Trials: The Defendants and Verdicts." The Nuremberg Trials: The Defendants and Verdicts. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Dec. 2012. <http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/verdicts.html>. "The Holocaust." United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. N.p., 1 Apr. 2010. Web. 6 Dec. 2012. <http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005143>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people have thought of the Nuremburg Trials as a very controversial topic, but I really only see one side to it. In my opinion, I believe that the Nuremburg Trials was a good and fair way to bring German military officials to justice. Firstly, after what they had done to the Jews, the Trials were the least that the Allies could have done. During WWII, the Nazi’s altogether managed to murder over 6 million Jews across Europe, so punishing the people who participated in the genocide wouldn’t be unfair at all. Therefore, the men who were forced to attend the Nuremburg Trials deserve to face the consequences for their crimes against humanity. In addition, if the trials never happened, the tragedy that happened to the Jewish population would have been left unanswered. For example, there were many Jewish holocaust survivors that had lost family and friends who were desperately looking for justice and revenge. For the sake of all the tragedies that the Jews had to face, the…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since the end of the World Wars, international criminal tribunals have had a growing role in the prosecution of international crime. In November 1945 the allied powers got together and showed procedural fairness against the Nazi officials. For crimes against humanity, this was the first time this occurred on a global scale. In the…

    • 538 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trials were a series of military courts, held by the Allied forces of World War II, defendent for the courts were men in the political, military, and economic leadership of the Nazi Germany. The first and best known of these trials was the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, which was aginst 22 of the most important captured leaders of Nazi Germany. It was held from November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946. The second set of trials of lesser war criminals was conducted under Control Council Law No. 10 at the US Nuremberg Military Tribunals; among them included the Doctors' Trial and the Judges'…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first trial was called The Major War Criminals´. Their were 24 individuals and six Nazi organizations being prosecuted (¨Nuremberg Trials¨ 2). One man was deemed medically unstable to be present in court and three others killed themselves before trial (¨Nuremberg Trials¨ 2).…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Holocaust: Buchenwald

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages

    <br><li>Rossel, Seymour. The Holocaust. New York: Franklin Watts, 1981 "U.S. Congressmen at Death Camp" The Associated Press.April 22, 1945…

    • 2850 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, the Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials prosecuting and questioning Nazi war criminals. When Hitler came to power, he created laws persecuting Jews and other enemies of Nazi. These laws provoked the death of 6 million European Jews. In response, the allied leaders of Great Britain, the U.S., and the Soviet Union “issued the first joint declaration officially noting the mass murder of European Jewry and resolving to prosecute those responsible for violence against civilian populations,” (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nuremburg Trials

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Holocaust was an unparalleled crime composed of millions of murders imprisonment, racism, and destruction. It destroyed millions of lives and wiped out over six million Jews during the course of World War II under Hitler’s power. The aftermath of these horrific events proved to be a difficult one since no form of punishment could ever suffice to the torture and pain the Nazi’s inflicted on the Jewish Community. This challenge was attempted by the International Military Tribunal (IMT) held at Nuremberg, Germany where they held Nazi’s in court for crimes of war and genocide. These became known as the Nuremburg Trials.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice In The Holocaust

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By the end of World War II, about two-thirds of the Jewish population were killed. Countless people lost their family and their friends. When the survivors were released from the concentration camps, numerous individuals had nowhere to go, and no place to call home. The Allied forces tried a multitude of Nazi War criminals in the Nuremberg Trials hoping that the imprisonment or killing of these flawed, yet guilty German officials would bring justice to those who survived the Holocaust. But was justice truly ever achieved?…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Holocaust was the country that sponsored mass murders for of over six million Jews by the Nazi government during World War II. It was the culmination of close to a decade of official discrimination, racial segregation, and brutal violence against the Jewish residential district in Germany. Under the shield of the war, the Nazis turned to systematic genocide after 1941, setting up industrial-style “extermination camps” planning to execute the detained Jewish population of Germany and Europe. While other groups targeted for extinction by the Nazi state, including gypsies, gays and communists, anti-Semitism was a fundamental tenet of Nazi ideology. In fact, Hitler believed until the end that the “war against the Jews” was a more important goal than victory in the conventional military battles of World War II. The Holocaust is today known as one of the worst mass crimes in human history.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    world over. Millions lay dead and dozens of top Nazi officials faced discipline for unspeakable war crimes.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many historians, most notably David Cesarani whose work has been crucial to the understanding of the period directly after the end of World War two, have raised questions over the immediate response of the British government to war criminals. In recent scholarly articles a closer examination of British involvement in war crimes trials has seen a shift in attitudes from those that saw Britain and the war time Prime Minister as actively partaking in the trial and execution of Nazi war criminals towards a view that the interest in the Holocaust in the 1960’s was sparked by British failure in 1945.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials were a series of war trials against the Nazis for their crimes committed during the war. In reference to the article provided, only twenty-two war criminals were tried, to begin with, and after only fifteen were given serious punishments on the count of their respective charges, twelve given the death sentence, and three lifelong sentences in prison. The other seven were either acquitted or given ten to twenty years in prison. The results and the consequences of these trials do not nearly equate to the six million deaths of Jews and other victims in the Holocaust. Although these trials showed the power of obeying judicial laws in worldly events, hundreds of thousands of perpetrators got away with crimes, and this in no way fully shows justification for the Jewish…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The war crime trials that took place all over the world, after World War II, were the first of their kind, and were meant to change the justice system in terms of international law during war time. The tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo were the most well known, trying 52 Japanese and German leaders between them. While similar in purpose and end result, the structure and organization were very different. The crimes that were tried by each differed from case to case, and Nuremberg was much more thorough. It is also the more widely publicized, for many reasons. It is the world symbol for the justice that is served to criminals for crimes against humanity and peace, while Tokyo lingers on obscurity.…

    • 3300 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first 40 years after the Nuremberg trial were period of slow progress in the development of international criminal law. From the perspective of global politics, they influenced the development of national criminal law into human rights and humanitarian fields. Therefore, they marked a turning point in the national jurisprudence focusing on individual responsibility of leaders, organizers, instigators as well as accomplices for serious mass atrocities.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a parallel universe, Adolf Hitler was in a court trial for the Nazi party's human experimentation, sterilization program and genocide during WWII. John Locke was the prosecuting lawyer and Hitler invited Jeremy Bentham to be his defending lawyer. Write a report of the trial recording the debate between Locke and Bentham and the court's final judgment.…

    • 574 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays