Preview

Oj Simpson Mistakes

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
658 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oj Simpson Mistakes
O.J. Simpson is a very powerful man that revolutionized the idea of a criminal trial. The well known former National Football League player and actor, was tried for the murder of his ex wife Nicole Brown Simpson, and waiter Ronald Lyle Goldman. The trial was broadcasted throughout the country and became part of people's lives. It lasted for almost a year, however on October 3, 1995, Simpson managed to walked out acquitted. To reach such results, Simpson took advantage of his juror's life experience; by making himself sound relatable, also, the prosecution was not well prepared and made several mistakes. Simpson was the Black Man that succeeded. He was the idol of many people across the world, thus, he was a very powerful man with an important …show more content…
Their first mistake was to agree with moving the trial to downtown Los Angeles courthouse, had the trial been in an white neighborhood the jury's decision might have been different. In addition, they thought that bringing former detective Mark Fuhrman to the stand was a good move, even though they knew about his past racist acts, and by doing so they basically ruined the prosecution. Also, they brought up a large amount of scientific evidence by explaining DNA, however they took a long time and, since DNA wasn't well known at the time, the explanation became not only confusing but also helped the defense's argument about LAPD's mishandling the evidence. Thus the jury didn't respond to the evidence in the way the prosecutors expected them to.

Equally important, the prosecution did not have enough people on the case, meanwhile the defense team was made up by a large group of very intelligent people, thus the prosecution should've asked for a third person to help with a different point of view or strategy. Also, they were tricked by the defense team to make O.J. Simpson try on the gloves found at the crime scene, and when he did so, it appeared to be too small for his hands, thus, whatever excuse the prosecutors could've used to explain what just happened would not make difference to what the jurors had just
…show more content…
Simpson was lucky to be who he is, because by having such power he was able to hire an amazing defense team that was able to point out every mishandled evidence pointed by the prosecution. Also, by having his social status, he not only got the world involved with his case, but was able to manipulate the jury's decision by appealing to them and seeming relatable even thought he had a "white life." That said, Simpson had the means that one need to be acquitted no matter the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The knife was found in the Simpson’s Brentwood Estate by the construction worker. The retired Police Officer has kept it for more than twelve years; It was found there for a reason. There should be further investigation that has to be done. It was a knife that had been found in the condominium where the murder happened. It should be kept as an evidence room and not the Police Officer that kept it for twelve years. The OJ Simpson case will be an enduring event till the murderer gets caught. There are numerous ways that can resolve this case. The authorities should scrutinize the retired cop for analysis of the knife who kept it for in excess of twelve years. He might be tangled in this murder. Therefore, OJ Simpson was not found guilty of killing her ex-wife and her friend. He can pay someone to kill his wife and her friend. He should not be entitled for a parole next year of being convicted of robbery and kidnapping. He is serving sentence nine to thirty-three years in prison. This crime he gets himself in to should not granted parole. He should not have done in the first place. The experts can use his crime record in the…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oj Simpson Case Study

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The O. J. Simpson robbery case (officially called the State of Nevada v. Orenthal James Simpson, et al.) was a criminal case prosecuted in 2007-2008 in the U.S. state of Nevada, primarily involving the retired American football player O. J. Simpson.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oj Simpson Case Study

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page

    Orenthal James “O.J.” Simpson was accused of murdering his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goodman in 1995. Twenty years on, his case still remains controversial, but why? Simpson was a star athlete until 1979, where he pursued his dream of becoming an actor (Harris, 2008). O.J.’s alleged murder of his former wife and her friend thrust him into the spotlight, catching the public’s attention, as well as every news station in the U.S. One factor that makes this case so notorious is that there were many flaws during the investigative process, and a lot of them lead to the outcome of Simpson’s freedom from his charges. Many of these investigative errors could have been overcome with rigorous surveillance of officers on the…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Simpson became famous for his career in college football at USC as well as winning the Heisman Trophy in 1968. Ultimately, Simpsons fame only grew when he was accused of murdering his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oj Simpson Research Paper

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think O.J.Simpson is guilty. I think he was lucky and everyone knew him for football but people that are known should not be treated any differently or in anyway that can benefit them. I think he was lucky to have the defense team that he had who tried to prove he was innocent when everyone knew what hew did I think that everyone knew it was him because during the videos he acted emotionless.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The O.J. Simpson murder case was a criminal trial held in Los Angeles, California from January 29 to October 3, 1995. The former football player and actor, O.J. Simpson was tried for the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. The case has been described as the most publicized and controversy criminal case in American history. The case was racially divided because most African Americans believed that Simpson was innocent and most Caucasian Americans believed he was guilty. The prosecutor had indisputable forensic evidence but the defense attorneys were able…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    However the jury did find him not guilty meaning the defense lawyers had to have instilled enough doubt into their minds to make them unable to say without a reasonable doubt. As I mentioned one of the biggest moments of the trial is Simpson trying on the glove and it not fitting. This was huge for instilling doubt in the jurors’ minds. A big theme throughout this case was racism. This is mentioned in an article titled 20 years after the killings: How O.J. Simpson got off, according to local legal pros. He interviewed a veteran lawyer named Bob Beyer who believed the case basically turned into a racial case. The jury had nine African Americans on it and if they were on Simpson’s side, the glove not fitting would be a perfect point for them. The Rodney King case three years earlier is mentioned and how the LAPD was a racist police department. This is a big point because the defense claimed that Detective Mark Fuhrman planted the glove to frame Simpson and if the jury thinks that the police could be racist they are going to believe this. Another big piece of evidence pointing towards Simpson was the sock with Nicole’s blood on it found at his house. However, the defense argued that this too was planted. Stating that the blood was smeared on the socks in the lab. This is a big deal because blood had soaked through to the other side. This would not be possible if there was a foot in it. Later on Fuhrman was charged for perjury because of his testimony on how he collected evidence. This would really hurt the prosecution because now it shows they had a bad witness and could make them think other evidence was tampered with. Simpson was also a huge star and loved by the people of LA and this could have also had a big impact on their decision. The trial probably should not have been done in LA due to a possible bias of Simpson’s fame there. Another big thing is that the prosecutors…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    O. J. Simpson Case Summary

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Colley Jr. was an ordinary man with little money and no fame. He shot and killed his wife, Amanda Cloaninger-Colley and her close friend, Lindy Dobbins on August 27, 2015. He fled from the police but was later arrested and found guilty of both murders. On June 13, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ronald Goldman, were found murdered outside of Simpson’s condo. Her husband, at the time, was the very famous and very wealthy professional football player Orenthal James Simpson, also known as O.J. Simpson. He fled from the police and was arrested. Simpson was the key suspect in both murders, but after a lengthy trial, he was later exonerated on all charges. How could this wealthy man not get charged with murder, when he was clearly the perpetrator?…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1985, Orenthal James Simpson married Nicole Brown Simpson. Several years later, the couple had filed for divorce. Throughout their marriage Orenthal was allegedly abusing Nicole. On June 13, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found dead outside of her Los Angeles home. Both victims had multiple lacerations across their faces and necks. Also, the wounds in their necks were very severe and exposed their larynxes. The police believed the crime was committed between 10:15 and 10:40 p.m. Soon enough, Orenthal was arrested because the LAPD believed he was the main suspect in the double homicide case. When he was arraigned, OJ pleaded not guilty to the charges of first degree murder.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There was no way Sacco and Vanzetti could have been proved guilty. People like Sacco and Vanzetti who were radicals or immigrants were called bad people and people could not trust them. People needed Jobs, but people did not want foreigners to take their jobs and also did not want them in their neighborhoods if they could not speak english. The hatred of foreigners grew as time went on. Because of all this, juror’s opinions of Sacco and Vanzetti were changed at the start of the trial. To them, it meant that they were both not good people and were probably guilty. Some witnesses were obviously lying because of propaganda and the information they read from newspapers and their information should not have been listened…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    OJ Simpson Guilty

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although more than most of the evidence could have put Mr. Simpson in prison for the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman if it had been found to be creditable, the fact that the investigation and collection were so splotchy and unorganized, with evidence being misplaced or lost and entered months later, notes that didn’t match up, and blood evidence that wasn’t properly packaged and secured by procedure. Just because Common sense tells us by looking at the abundance of evidence brought forward otherwise, for…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    had a chance to get acquitted. By not allowing the evidence the judge took away any chance that…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 19, 1994 O.J Simpson the football hall of famer was arrested in California for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. Simpson was arraigned in court two day later he pleaded not guilty to the charges and was held in the Los Angeles County jail. Jury selection began in October and the jury was sworn in on November 2, 1994. Mr. Simpson did have a jury of his peers, because the jury was twelve jurors some African American and white. The jurors were picked through the voir dire process. With each juror understanding that they could not have any personal bias pertaining to the case. A series of question were asked to the jurors to determine if the potential jurors had exposure to the context of the case. In the pretrial hear the credibility of evidence from detective Mark Fuhrman would be admitted at trial. Prosecutors said that they thought Mr. Simpson dropped the glove as he tried to quickly return to his home after committing the murders.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oj Simpson Criminal Trial

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 1995 criminal trial of O. J. Simpson for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman has been called "a great trash novel come to life,".No one can deny the pull it had on the American public and the fans of the great O.J. Simpson. During the early reports of the murder of the wife of the ex-football star, and the cunning , head turning sports announcer had not caught people's full attention, Simpson's surreal Bronco ride on the day of his arrest most definitly did. Police accumulated enough evidence against Simpson to indicate that he was guilt of the murders and they sought and obtained a warrant for his arrest. But there was an agreement worked out with Simpson's attorney, Robert Shapiro that Simpson was to turn himself in…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    O.J. Simpson Murder Trial

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There was an abundance of evidence recovered by police and the prosecuting attorney that really makes you think about how in the world this man was set free. For instance, there was a bloody shoe found around the crime scene but not just any shoe, it was a size 12 Bruno Magli shoe, a relatively rare Italian-made model. It just so happens that O.J. Simpson wears a size 12. It also happens to be a coincidence that, according to the prosecuting attorney, O.J. Shopped at this particular store that often sold this brand of shoe.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays