Preview

Oral Student Presentation

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
435 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oral Student Presentation
Eliel Ortiz
College Composition English 101/A01
Professor Rosie Soy
Oral Student Presentation
10/22/14

According to Philip Lau his research paper “The Limitations of Wikipedia” he informs his readers on the disadvantages of using wikipedia as a reliable source for research. Lau analyzes the controversy of using wikipedia as a reliable source. He states how its great for using it as a starting point on any research, however its to be used with great caution. Lau clarifies on how wikipedia is a software that allows people to “collaborate” in adding content. In simpler terms anyone with an account can add,modify,rearrange or delete information on any desired article. Lau also states that many articles consist of opinionated beliefs.Not all entries in the site will be objective for example controversial topics will most likely reflect on both sides of the issue. He goes on to say that anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published and claim to be an expert.Which means that credibility among publishers lack on this site.
This article was a great example of a descriptive essay. He combined his own ideas with quotes and paraphrases from his sources.as well as detailed facts to suport his ideas. For example in page 4 Lau states, “Another problem with wikipedia is the ease with which entries can be easily edited, because the content of wikis can be altered by anyone.”. Lau used the example of the notorious case of john Seigenthaler Sr. “He was a journalist who was falsely accused in a wikipedia entry of being involved in the assassination of John F Kennedy.The false information stayed on the site for four months”
This article was was well stated and made me realize how dangerous using wikipedia as a source can be. I was one of those people that would turn to wikipedia for assistance when I would procrastinate an entire week on an assignment. Aside from risking plagiarism the source might not even be as reliable as well

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Randall McClure’s essay “Googlepedia” assesses current students’ predominate approach to research-based writing, and uses realistic ways to push such approaches further. He does this by analyzing two of his students’ methods. Of the strategies his students use, perhaps the most effective is Edward’s use of Wikipedia as a leaping off point, before delving further and entering search terms into Google (230). This practice should be just the beginning of an in-depth research process. However, Edward’s successional use of search engines does provide a template for an ideal research process. In addition, although he does not go nearly in depth, he does include an assessment of the author’s credibility (229). More rigorous assessment could greatly…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I evaluate to determine whether a resource is a valuable source of information I look for currency and/or history of resource; identify the author’s authority; and informational bias.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    STurner Assignment Unit3

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a. Why are wikis, forums and blogs not considered valid sources for academic research? Minimum 50 words. I think that wikis, forums and blogs are not valid sources for academic research because these are all contributed to by regular people who base their input on their own opinions and findings, not by reading it or citing it from any type of academic text. These are all based on personal findings and not referenced to any type of reference book in any way.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Howto Set Up Apa Style

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * When writing a research paper, you should never include Wikipedia as a resource, why is Wikipedia not consideration a credible source?…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is one of the most sought out information website. Jimmy Wales, founder says this about his website, “Wikipedia is something special…, it is a place we can all go to think, to learn and share our knowledge with others” (Wikipedia, 2012, p1). This resourceful tool has up-to-date news, press releases, and it provides its users with the convenience to various languages. In this paper team C will debate on supporting arguments for Wikipedia and opposing arguments if it is credible and a valid source of information.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The writer wrote this essay to warn fellow college students the dangers of using Wikipedia as an academic research source. No student wants to go through hours of studying and research for a paper and end up using incorrect information. Knowing this, the writer starts by discrediting Wikipedia…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Relevance: According to the research on citations of Wikipedia, Along with the increasing number of citations, another indicator that Wikipedia may be gaining respectability is its citation by well-known scholars. (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2008)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a researcher, I must be aware of what information from the Internet. I must keep a look out for bias opinions, and cited materials.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Powerpoint Presentation

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since the beginning of college, I have learned many ways that will change my life…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Reading articles do seem to get very tiresome and useless when the internet is available. One thinks, ‘Why waste time…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    wiki

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The open nature of Wikipedia has led to various concerns, such as the quality of writing,[19][20] the amount of vandalism,[21][22] and the accuracy of information. Some articles contain unverified or inconsistent information,[23] though a 2005 investigation in Nature showed that the science articles they compared came close to the level of accuracy of Encyclopædia Britannica and had a similar rate of "serious errors".[24] Britannica replied that the study's methodology and conclusions were flawed,[25] but Nature reacted to this refutation with both a formal response and a point-by-point rebuttal of Britannica's main objections.[26]…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics