From this scenario, the managing are gave opportunity to assess a motivational program designed to re-energize a troubled company’s workforce. Acting on behalf of the company’s executive board, you’ll evaluate the board’s current strategy based on survey data and also advise board members about improving the effectiveness of this program based on five option management system and motivation in organizations. The managing systems have five program and their methods. From there, we can consider the independent and dependent variable for each program. Program I essentially is about opting out of the ideas set forth by the HR team, in essence, continuing to stay the course, where information is not shared with the employee and opportunities for participation are excluded. Out of 299 stores, 83 chose this method. Program II is based on the management approach of sharing information about absences and sick leave and its impact on store operations, giving the employees an opportunity to act on things they can control. This program was selected by 27 stores. Program III is based on the sharing of information of sales and inventory without measuring the impact of absence and sick leave of employees. This method was selected by 35 stores. Program IV is more comprehensive combining Program II and III and includes weekly brainstorming sessions, in which employees make suggestion to improve sales and performance. This method was selected by 67 stores. Program V has brainstorming sessions in which employees are can make suggestion and state their ideas, without sharing other information. This method was selected by 87 stores. There are many independent variables in this case or experiment such as individual management styles, demographics of the store region, employee satisfaction, and employee tenure and employee age. In each of these programs, the independent variable is mostly the employee. The dependent variable
From this scenario, the managing are gave opportunity to assess a motivational program designed to re-energize a troubled company’s workforce. Acting on behalf of the company’s executive board, you’ll evaluate the board’s current strategy based on survey data and also advise board members about improving the effectiveness of this program based on five option management system and motivation in organizations. The managing systems have five program and their methods. From there, we can consider the independent and dependent variable for each program. Program I essentially is about opting out of the ideas set forth by the HR team, in essence, continuing to stay the course, where information is not shared with the employee and opportunities for participation are excluded. Out of 299 stores, 83 chose this method. Program II is based on the management approach of sharing information about absences and sick leave and its impact on store operations, giving the employees an opportunity to act on things they can control. This program was selected by 27 stores. Program III is based on the sharing of information of sales and inventory without measuring the impact of absence and sick leave of employees. This method was selected by 35 stores. Program IV is more comprehensive combining Program II and III and includes weekly brainstorming sessions, in which employees make suggestion to improve sales and performance. This method was selected by 67 stores. Program V has brainstorming sessions in which employees are can make suggestion and state their ideas, without sharing other information. This method was selected by 87 stores. There are many independent variables in this case or experiment such as individual management styles, demographics of the store region, employee satisfaction, and employee tenure and employee age. In each of these programs, the independent variable is mostly the employee. The dependent variable