these higher education and job programs does help the prison system economically, while decreasing the recidivism rates, there isn’t enough objective data to clearly conclude these results. In the article, Prison’s Dilemma: Do Education and Jobs Programmes Affect Recidivism? by Norman H. Sedgley, Charles E. Scott, Nancy A. Williams and Frederick W. Derrick, the authors point out a very peculiar point, that the data supporting recidivism rates are somehow manipulated or due to poor methodological study, which results into unequal data. (Sedgley. 499). Because of selected testing, and “contaminated” data, the results can be manipulated to one sidedly support these initiatives to reduce recidivism. And with no direct correlation or direct results for these programs, one can’t find the true results of these initiatives, and argue that implementing these programs show little to no results, therefore rendering it ineffective.
these higher education and job programs does help the prison system economically, while decreasing the recidivism rates, there isn’t enough objective data to clearly conclude these results. In the article, Prison’s Dilemma: Do Education and Jobs Programmes Affect Recidivism? by Norman H. Sedgley, Charles E. Scott, Nancy A. Williams and Frederick W. Derrick, the authors point out a very peculiar point, that the data supporting recidivism rates are somehow manipulated or due to poor methodological study, which results into unequal data. (Sedgley. 499). Because of selected testing, and “contaminated” data, the results can be manipulated to one sidedly support these initiatives to reduce recidivism. And with no direct correlation or direct results for these programs, one can’t find the true results of these initiatives, and argue that implementing these programs show little to no results, therefore rendering it ineffective.