Preview

Overturn Doma

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1344 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Overturn Doma
Bill Clinton encourages court to overturn DOMA

Paola Santiago Ortiz
Sociology 111, Winter 13
Professor Rabinowitz
March 10, 2013
Bill Clinton encourages court to overturn DOMA
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was signed by former President Bill Clinton “in 1996 barring federal recognition of same-sex weddings” (Baker). DOMA defines “marriage for federal purpose as the union of a man and woman” (Baker); however, “it did not ban same-sex marriage in the states” (Baker) and allowed the states to have the choice in recognizing a same-sex marriage or not. The fight to overturn DOMA has been an ongoing event in the United States, however the first publicly known lawsuit against DOMA, according to Maza, was filed around July 8, 2009 and there have been about five others since. The fight to overturn DOMA does not currently have an end date; however some people believe it would be over soon. DOMA has been in effect for 17 years and Mr. Clinton believes that the law is unconstitutional and contravenes the quintessential American values” (Baker) and has join President Obama in the fight to overturn the law. Mr. Clinton, was a president that had help the homosexual community and promote their rights, had felt the pressure from Republican leaders when he signed the law in 1996 and believe that they were attempting to utilize this issue to damage his image and “chances for a second term” (Baker). Mr. Clinton has spent most of his time after his presidency term trying to distance himself from the law he signed and explain why he signed DOMA. According to Baker, Mr. Clinton believes that the law is discriminatory and provides and excuse for discrimination for same-sex couples.
The fight against DOMA is a great topic to research in the sociological world because many of the sociological concepts can be utilized to talk about this hot topic. During my research, I can safely say that religion plays a major part for the opponents of same-sex marriage and supporters of



References: Baker, P. (2013, March 07). Clinton urges court to overturn marriage law he signed. Retrieved on 9 March 2013 from http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/07/clinton-urges-court-to-overturn-marriage-law-he-signed/?src=recg Clinton, Bill (2013, March 07). It’s time to overturn DOMA. Retrieved on 9 March 2013 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/bill-clinton-its-time-to-overturn-doma/2013/03/07/fc184408-8747-11e2-98a3-b3db6b9ac586_story.html Henslin, J. 2010. Sociology: A Down to Earth Approach. 10th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Kinder, D. and Kam, C. 2010. Us against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion. University of Chicago Press. Maza, C. (2012, March 01). Overview: The Six Current DOMA Lawsuits. Retrieved on 9 March 2013 from http://equalitymatters.org/blog/201103010013 New Testament. Matthews 19. Retrieved on 10 March 2013 from http://bible.oremus.org/?passage=Matthew+19 Pacific school of religion. (2009). Retrieved on 9 March 2013 from http://www.clgs.org/marriage/state-definitions Parker-Pope, T. (2008, June 10). Gay Unions She Light on Gender in Marriage. Retrieved on 10 March 2013 from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/10/health/10well.html?_r=0

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    DOMA Ruling Case Study

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DOMA caused the federal government to not recognize gay marriages. This meant gay and lesbian partners of federal employees did not receive federal health insurance,…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 1: Mahe Vs. Alberta

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary: Federal appeals court judges questioned lawyers on both sides of Virginia’s potentially landmark fay marriage case. Hundreds of protestors gathered outside the courthouse holding signs and shouting slogans. The three-judge panel questioned the lawyers throughout the case that challenged the state’s same-sex marriage prohibition. A decision is expected in a few weeks on an issue both sides believe will ultimately lead to the decision of the Supreme Court U.S. Impact: This potentially landmark decision will definitely influence the social environment of Virginia.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obergefell Case Summary

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Obergefell decision is a landmark case that deals with a much greater debate than just that of the legality of same-sex marriage. The majority opinion of the court ruled in favor of the guaranteed right to marriage in every U.S. state regardless of the sex of the individuals involved. While the advancement of liberal social rights is evident in this opinion, the ruling, perhaps more importantly, confronts the struggle between the dissenting views of the nature of Constitutional revision. Through the Obergefell majority opinion and Scalia’s dissent, we see a profound and necessary debate regarding how to treat our nation’s founding document moving forward.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was passed in 1996. Section 3 of DOMA specifically prohibited the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages by defining marriage as a “union between a man and a woman.” As a result, same-sex married couples could not receive any of the federal benefits that opposite-sex married couples do, such as federal tax benefits, immigration status, and Social Security benefits.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Similarly, Justices interpretation of the Constitution using their personal ideology played an important role in the same-sex marriage issue. In 1996, President Bill Clinton signed DOMA act into law which banned same-sex marriage because marriage was believed to be between man and woman. In the United States V. Windsor (2013) case, the Justices interpreted the DOMA as unconstitutional and as a violation of the Fifth…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roe vs. Wade Case Study

    • 2346 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Roe v. Wade is one of the most controversial and politically significant cases in U.S. Supreme Court history. This case resulted in a landmark decision regarding abortion.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POLS 4360 FINAL EXAM

    • 2183 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As of late last year, Hillary Clinton was competing with an open radio host about her position on same-sex marriage, protecting her past hesitance to examine the issue and missing the mark concerning full-throated backing (NYT). Presently, in a notably new position, Clinton is putting forth simply that, calling gay marriage a privilege managed by the Constitution."Hillary Clinton underpins marriage balance and trusts the Supreme Court will drop the hammer as an afterthought of same-sex couples being ensured that established right," said Adrienne Elrod, a Clinton…

    • 2183 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against DOMA

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1993, Hawaii state government ruled that prohibiting same-sex marriage violated equal protections defined by the Hawaii Constitution (Pelts, 2014). In response, Rob Barr introduced DOMA to nationally define marriage as a union between a man and a woman on May 7, 1996. In September 1996, DOMA became federally recognized by President Bill Clinton after undergoing voting from the House and Senate. Under DOMA, marriage is defined as a “union between one man and one woman as husband and wife and spouse of the opposite sex” (Pelts, 2014, p.238). In addition to the federal definition of marriage, DOMA also allows individual states to invalidate same-sex marriages performed in other states (Koppelman, 1997). In 2011,…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This secondary web document gave me valuable information about how women expressed to others their opinions. It also provided facts about the women activists group called Redstockings. It demonstrated their frustration towards laws that made it difficult for women to obtain abortions. I used this information in my historical background to show the effects women on society.…

    • 3793 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exam review

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Defense of Marriage Act(DOMA): Act that denied federal recognition to same-sex couples and gave states the right to legally ignore gay or lesbian marriages should they gain legal recognition in Hawaii or any other state. Signed into law by President Bill Clinton.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Coun 501

    • 4924 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Katel, P. (2008, July 18). Race and politics. CQ Researcher, 18, 577-600. Retrieved June 22, 2010, from CQ Researcher Online,…

    • 4924 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doma Unconstitutional

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Synopsis: The article is written by former US President Bill Clinton who in 1996 signed the Defense of Marriage Act which stated that marriage is defined as being between Man and Woman. What this means for gay couples is that they cannot enjoy the benefits that heterosexual couples have such as the ability to file taxes jointly, equal family benefits when it comes to pensions and health care and other federal statuses (Clinton 2013). While same-sex marriage is legal is several states it is not recognized by the Federal Government due to the DOMA. Bill Clinton who originally signed it states that he no longer supports it and says that “DOMA and opposition to marriage equality are vestiges of just such an unfamiliar society” (Clinton 2013). While he was signing DOMA he made sure to make the statement that it should not be taken as an act of discrimination and now 17 years later in 2013 he admits that the law itself is discriminatory and that it should be overturned in court.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Media Bias

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Same-sex marriage has been an on-going battle for many years. California’s opposition to same-sex marriage, Proposition 8, barely passed in the 2008 election. Same-sex marriage has been a news-worthy topic since 1997 when Hawaii passed a Domestic Partnership policy which triggered other states to change policies as well. This issue started a state-to-state debate of whether same-sex couples should have the same rights that heterosexual, married couples have. This debate between states has reached a Congressional level. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear two cases surrounding this on-going debate. The cases the Court will hear are related to allowable benefits for same-sex partners, and California’s ban on gay marriage.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homosexual Marriage

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Defense of Marriage Act is a United States federal law which signed by Bill Clinton in 1996 restricts federal marriage benefits and required inter-state marriage recognition to only opposite-sex marriages in the United States.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays