Preview

Paraphrased: A Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
736 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Paraphrased: A Case Study
Marilyn negligently ran over Lucinda with her vehicle. While learning to use crutches Lucinda fell and broke her arm. Subsequently, an alternative situation is presented where Lucinda performs a dare where she walks on an extremely narrow walkway. The question is presented if these events constitute a superseding cause. To answer these questions, one should consult the Restatement. The Restatement, paraphrased, suggests, “if the defendant is liable for a physical injury then the defendant is also liable for harm sustained in a subsequent accident which would not have occurred had the other’s condition not been impaired, and which is a normal consequence of such impairment.”
Therefore, if Lucinda was learning to use crutches with reasonable
…show more content…
A child taking a dare could be argued as normal behavior. This flip side to the equation is why what comprises “a reasonable person” is a topic of debate. However, the very nature of a “dare” implies the behavior in question is not reasonable. Otherwise, the request for the behavior could not be classified as a dare. No one has ever said, “I dare you to walk reasonably on your crutches!” Otherwise, if Lucinda had walked across this extremely narrow walkway outside of a dare other interesting analysis would take place. If there were other areas of travel and she chose the more dangerous avenue, then this may still imply negligence. However, if this was Lucinda’s normal avenue of travel, without alternative, then it may be argued she was displaying reasonable behavior through an objective standard. A hypothetical reasonable person on crutches needing to arrive at a destination, such as their home, having no other angle of ingress would likely use the same narrow path, regardless of the added danger of crutches. Additionally, the defense might explore Lucinda’s pre-existing medical history. However, in this situation, it must be acknowledged the above is not the case. Lucinda was engaging in behavior she obviously knew to be hazardous to her health under the social pressure of a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    14. As a further result of the injuries sustained by Plaintiff, there is a reasonable probability that Plaintiff will require further medical care and attention and will incur future reasonable and necessary expenses for medical care and attention. Plaintiff’s doctors estimated over $100,000 in future medical bills, plastic surgery, and counseling to be incurred by Plaintiff.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rule: The main objective of the Comparative Fault Act is to modify the common law rule of contributory negligence under which, a plaintiff who was only slightly negligent was barred from recovery. Under the Comparative Fault Act, each person whose fault contributed to the injury must bear their proportionate share of the total fault.( Ind. Code § 34-51-2-1, et seq.)…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ms. Hollar’s neck was examined and the records state that the examination was negative for injury or acute deformity. The neurological examination was negative for altered mental state and loss of consciousness. A CAT scan and x-rays were negative. After the accident the plaintiff was seen by Dr. DaRoach and the doctor noted, “ She has no pain going to lower extremities, no weakness in the upper extremities and denies any headaches/blurred vision/weakness in legs.”…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Deb's Case

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main question here in this case is who is liable, negligent and damages. Deb is driving her car when it is involved in an accident with a car driven by Abe. A few moments after the first crash, a car driven by Ann hits the two cars disabled from the first crash. Cal, a passenger in Abe’s car has a minor injury to his head from the first crash but serious injury to his knees and legs from Ann’s subsequent driving into the first crash. Cal is taken to the hospital where Doctor informs him, correctly, that he will lose both legs unless he consents to an immediate particular type of surgery which may save his legs. Doctor does not inform Cal that this type of surgery, if successful, will mean that his repaired knees will need artificial…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In assessing the decision of whether a defendant has violated a duty of care in a sport with high risks, the standard should include whether the actions of the defendant caused the conditions to be more dangerous than the usual accepted dangers of the sport. It was determined that the construction to the area did not increase the risks of an already dangerous sport. The plaintiff, a rider with over 20 years of experience assumed the inherent risks by admitting that he had participated in this race many times before and was familiar with the course. Therefore the defendant did not owe a duty of care based on the fact that the plaintiff assumed the risks by participating in a…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torts 1 Outline Pittman

    • 27721 Words
    • 111 Pages

    2. Issue: Whether P can recover for the loss of wages during those 9 days, the destruction of personal property b/c of injury, and the conscious pain and suffering he experienced in the 9 days…

    • 27721 Words
    • 111 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Laws 310 Week 3

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. You are the judge in the case. Does Susie have a case against Ruthless? Is Ruthless the proximate cause of Susie’s injuries?…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiffs argues recovery under the “reasonably Foreseeability” test, which would allow a Plaintiff outside the “Zone of Danger” to recover, which was adopted in Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146 (1979). The Court stated in response that the Plaintiff’s flexible interpretation of the “jurisprudential concept …which require[s] that the defendant’s breach of a duty of care proximately causes plaintiff’s injury,” was flawed. Moreover, that “at some point along the causal chain, the passage of time and the span of distance mandate a cut-off point for liability.” Id.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff must have sustained actual damages to his/her person or property to recover for negligence. Alee broke her Arm and ankle because of her slip and fall at Bobs. Therefore, she may recover damages.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Superseding Cause – an intervening act that relieves the defendant of liability (Ex: minor motor vehicle accident turns into a fatality due to the doctor making a mistake – other driver not liable for that death)…

    • 5389 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Proximate cause exists when the connection between an act and an injury is strong enough to justify imposing liability.…

    • 4685 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence: Moe V. Barry

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When Moe unexpectedly moved, Barry created a deep cut on Moe’s throat. Therefore, Moe would not have been injured but for the Barry use of the straight razor. Thus, Moe will be able to show actual causation. d. Proximate Cause Proximate cause refers to the chain of foreseeability between the defendant’s action and plaintiff’s injuries.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Study Guide

    • 4740 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Defendant’s actions were the proximate cause (nearest cause/ number of factors that collectively caused the Plaintiff’s injuries) or actual cause (specific factor that caused the Plaintiff’s injuries) of the harm to Plaintiff…

    • 4740 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For applying contributory negligence, Bourque should assume the risk of Duplechin's collision. Nevertheless, Duplechin's action was unusual and unsportsmanlike conduct. A participant does not assume the risk of injury from fellow players acting in an unexpected or unsportsmanlike way with a reckless lack of concern for others…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prescription drug abuse is a modern-day disease. In an estimate, over six million Americans have abused prescription medication. However, there is no completely accurate way to measure prescription drug abuse. Many people suffer from addiction because of certain doctors’ carelessness in writing prescriptions. When doctors’ are caught intentionally over prescribing abused medications, they are typically the punishment for their crimes is very small. Young adults are also beginning to abuse prescription drugs by illegally purchasing them from the prescription holder and using them as study or party drugs. Prescription drug abuse has torn apart families, destroyed lives, and has even resulted in death. Some people think that by focusing on prescription…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays