Preview

Alee V. Bob's Negligence Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1442 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alee V. Bob's Negligence Case Study
Alee V. Bob’s

Negligence
Negligence requires a showing that a duty was owed, that the duty was breached, and that the breach was the actual and proximate cause of damages

Special Duty- Land Occupier/Invitee
A special duty arises in circumstances involving a land occupier. An invitee is one who enters upon the land of another with the owner’s permission for the purpose related to the activity. The landowner owes an invitee a duty of care to inspect and discover any dangerous condition and to make the premises safe.
Bob’s grocery store is a business that is open to the public, thus making it a landowner. Alee entered that business during regular operating hours, making her an invitee.
Bobs grocery store owes a duty to all who enter a duty
…show more content…
Plaintiff must have sustained actual damages to his/her person or property to recover for negligence.
Alee broke her Arm and ankle because of her slip and fall at Bobs.
Therefore, she may recover damages.

Special Damages
Plaintiff may recover for any medical damages or lost income if specifically plead.
All broke her arms and ankle because of her slip and fall at Bobs. She may be able to recover special damages for lost income due to her injuries.

Defenses: Contributory Negligence
The plaintiff’s contributory negligence, however slight was a complete bar to his recovery against a negligent defendant. If a plaintiff conduct falls below the reasonable person standard of care and contributes to his own injury or damages, he is barred from recovering against defendant.
The facts stated that Alee slipped on the grapes she “failed to notice” in the entryway. Bobs may argue that had Alee watched where she was walking, she could have avoided slipping in the grapes entirely and avoided injury. However, it is not reasonable to only look at the floor while walking, especially in a business that encourages looking at products.
Therefore, contributory negligence is no
…show more content…
An invitee is one who enters upon the land of another with the owner’s permission for the purpose related to the activity. The landowner owes an invitee a duty of care to inspect and discover any dangerous condition and to make the premises safe, including inspecting samples and products.
Bob’s grocery store is a business that is open to the public, thus making it a landowner. Liz entered that business during regular operating hours, making her an invitee.
Bobs grocery store owes a duty to all who enter a duty of care to inspect and discover any dangerous conditions and products and make them safe. As Liz was an invitee of Bob’s, Bobs owed Liz a duty of care.

Breach
A breach occurs when a duty of care toward another fails to live up to that standard owed.
Bobs had a duty to inspect and correct any unsafe condition for it’s customer. Since Bobs was offering samples of a product, they had a duty to inspect the product before giving it to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    14. As a further result of the injuries sustained by Plaintiff, there is a reasonable probability that Plaintiff will require further medical care and attention and will incur future reasonable and necessary expenses for medical care and attention. Plaintiff’s doctors estimated over $100,000 in future medical bills, plastic surgery, and counseling to be incurred by Plaintiff.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scarlet Rose Case Summary

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case of Scarlet Rose her claim for damages done to her and bills brought up for damages that occur to her because of her slip and fall accident at the Nickel & Dime store on January 31, 2001. Ms. Rose wants compensation for the accident at Nickel & Dime and her medical bills paid. Ms. Rose entered Nickel & Dime and as she was walking and she slipped over a box in the middle of the isle that an employee had placed there. Ms. Rose says that she did not see the box as a rack was blocking her view. She was in a little hurry, but not distracted.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johnny was riding in his mother’s car when another car hit them. He suffered several leg and rib fractures and was taken to the local hospital for treatment. His injuries included a closed fracture of the right Tibia, and closed fracture of the 3rd and 4t ribs on the right side. Treatment included the closed reduction of his fractures. The hospital submitted an insurance claim to his parent’s medical insurance for payment. The insurance company denied payment.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Memo PA110

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “The plaintiff shall be barred from recovering damages if the trier of fact finds that the contributory fault on the part of the plaintiff is more than 50% of the proximate cause of the injury or damage for which recovery is sought.” Illinois State Statute 735 ILCS 5/2-1116(c) (2011). Thus we must provide proof that the plaintiff, Mr. King contributed at least 51% of the negligence.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Breach of duty is defined as “the violation of a legal or moral obligation; the failure to act as the law obligates one to act; especially a fiduciary’s violation of an obligation owed to another.” Black’s Law Dictionary 214 (9th ed. 2009)…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to determine the role of DD’s violation of the statute in the car accident the three-part negligence per se test must be applied to determine if . The three elements of the negligence per se test: whether the statute protects a class of individuals of which the Plaintiff is a member, protects against harm of the sort that the Plaintiff suffered, is an appropriate standard for use in the case. Applying this statute to the case it can be determined that the statute was created to protect the class of individuals such as the hitchhiker, i.e. passengers in other vehicles while DD was driving on the road in a tractor trailer truck which he was not licensed to drive. The state statute 101 was not created to prevent the type of harm that was suffered by the Plaintiff, the hitchhiker’s injury was caused by FF’s rear-ending DD and not by DD driving a tractor trailer truck. This is also not the appropriate standard for use in this case because the harm was not the result of violation of the standard. Therefore, the reasonable person standard should be applied instead of negligence per…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff’s injuries included a dislocated shoulder, loss of consciousness, and a laceration on her head. 5. Due to the injuries sustained by the plaintiff at the defendant’s store the plaintiff has been unable to work and has incurred expensive medical bills ($25,000). 6. Plaintiff has suffered prolonged damage due to the unlikelihood of her complete recovery and inability to return to work coupled with emotional damages from the action.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samantha Smith Case

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In our case Samantha Smith had an accident in a retail store where she slipped on shampoo that had leaked from the bottle and suffered a broken hip. In her suite against the store Samantha claims the store is at fault; however, the store claims that Samantha failed to exercise due care while shopping and that she is partially to blame for the accident. The three articles below pertain to our case in one way or another.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    X

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plaintiff, Jerome Bourque, Jr., filed this suit to recover damages for personal injuries received in a softball game. Made defendants were Adrien Duplechin, a member of the opposing team who inflicted the injuries, and Duplechin's liability insurer, Allstate Insurance Company.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Duty to Invitees – to exercise reasonable care to protect invitees against dangerous conditions possessor should know of, but invitees are unlikely to discover (this one is more extensive than the others)…

    • 5389 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    To determine whether a duty of care has been breached, a judge asks how he or she would have acted in the same circumstances.…

    • 4685 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A breach of duty is when a defendant failed to meet his or her legal obligations, if there is in fact a legal duty of care. Since there is a legal duty of care, the plaintiff did in fact have a breach of duty by not having clean and sterilized nail instruments. They also did not ask about previous diseases or illnesses or gave warning that injury is possible, which is also a part of their duty. Businesses must maintain safe store conditions and provide clean environments that protect their customers from harm. From the plaintiff’s testimony, T & J did not use clean nail instruments, although I could have missed later proof that showed they did in fact use clean nail tools.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    plaintiff Bourque's injuries resulted from negligence of defendant Duplechin; Bourque was not guilty of contributory negligence and did not asuume the risk of this particular accident; and defendant Allstate did not prove that coverage was excluded under the terms of its policy.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Policy

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The second element, breach of duty, is the failure to conform to or the departure from a required duty of care owed to a person. Once a duty of care has been created, the plaintiff must exhibit that the defendant breached that duty by failing to comply with the required accepted standard of care. Evidence of a breach of duty typically can be offered through expert testimony or res ipsa loquitur (“the thing speaks for itself”).…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays