Parthenon Vs Pantheon

Rome and Greece are known very well for their ancient architecture. Some of their ancient architecture is still in good condition. Architects around the world study these ancient sculptures in attempt to mimic the unique style as seen in many of todays modern buildings. I will be comparing the Greek Parthenon and the Roman Pantheon.

The Parthenon in Greece was started in about 447 B.C. up until 432 B.C. It's structure was that of a temple and part of the Doric order. The layout of the Parthenon was rectangular and was surrounded by Doric columns. The entrance and rear were occupied by 6 large doric columns on each end of the structure. The Parthenon was identified by its doric order. Above the large columns was the entablature which is where the triglyphs and metopes were visible. These areas of the entablature consisted of several different sculptures. The metopes represented the forces or order and justice which were surrounded by the triglyphs on either side. The Pedimental sculptures were placed above the cornice, which was above the triglyphs on the Pediment. These were sculptures The Parthenon consisted of two rooms: the "naos", which
It's construction lasted from 118 A.D up until 128 A.D. The structure was considered the "temple of god". The Pantheon is located in Rome, Italy and was classified as a temple back in its primary years, and has even been used as a burial site as well, but is now considered a church. This building is in very good condition and receives many visits from tourists around the world. Many ceremonies and weddings are held at the Pantheon each year, which makes it the worlds largest concrete dome. It's structure is that of the Corinthian order. The porch is occupied by 8 large Corinthian columns in the front, preceded by 2 sets of four columns. The dome as a opening at the top making the sky visible fro the inside, also known as the