Is it constitutional to ban “Partial-Birth” abortions without providing for an exception to protect the health of the mother? My partner and I were on the negative side, which means there should be an exception for the mom to get a PBA if the mother’s health is at risk. Or if the doctor recommends it would be best for the mother to do have a PBA because she might have complications. In 2003, Congress passed the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Signed by President George W. Bush, the ban was immediately challenged in federal court but On April 18, 2007, the Court handed down its decision in the Gonzales v. Carhart case. Partial birth abortion is a late-term abortion of a fetus that has already died, or is killed before being completely removed from the mother. The procedure can be traumatizing and may sound inhuman but we are not saying that this should be used as a form of birth control but should be used if the mother is at risk of dying if she has the baby. It should only be accepted in serious cases in which the pregnancy could harm the mother or the fetus. There are a lot of medical conditions that doctors and or mothers would want to do a PBA, some medical conditions and indications may develop after the first trimester (12 weeks) of pregnancy that could threaten the mother's life and/or health. These would be late occurring medical reasons for which we believe it is okay to get a partial birth abortion: heart failure, severe or uncontrollable diabetes, serious renal disease, uncontrollable hypertension (high blood pressure) and/or Severe depression. What may be confusing when we mention depression is that people think that it gives them an excuse to have a PBA but in fact we mean that some people with severe depression may lead to other symptoms that may put the baby in harm while in the mother. For example when some people are depressed they drink, smoke, and in some cases they starve themselves, which would deprive the
Is it constitutional to ban “Partial-Birth” abortions without providing for an exception to protect the health of the mother? My partner and I were on the negative side, which means there should be an exception for the mom to get a PBA if the mother’s health is at risk. Or if the doctor recommends it would be best for the mother to do have a PBA because she might have complications. In 2003, Congress passed the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Signed by President George W. Bush, the ban was immediately challenged in federal court but On April 18, 2007, the Court handed down its decision in the Gonzales v. Carhart case. Partial birth abortion is a late-term abortion of a fetus that has already died, or is killed before being completely removed from the mother. The procedure can be traumatizing and may sound inhuman but we are not saying that this should be used as a form of birth control but should be used if the mother is at risk of dying if she has the baby. It should only be accepted in serious cases in which the pregnancy could harm the mother or the fetus. There are a lot of medical conditions that doctors and or mothers would want to do a PBA, some medical conditions and indications may develop after the first trimester (12 weeks) of pregnancy that could threaten the mother's life and/or health. These would be late occurring medical reasons for which we believe it is okay to get a partial birth abortion: heart failure, severe or uncontrollable diabetes, serious renal disease, uncontrollable hypertension (high blood pressure) and/or Severe depression. What may be confusing when we mention depression is that people think that it gives them an excuse to have a PBA but in fact we mean that some people with severe depression may lead to other symptoms that may put the baby in harm while in the mother. For example when some people are depressed they drink, smoke, and in some cases they starve themselves, which would deprive the