they only describe him as this big heroic person who is brave, strong,and more.But really was he that heroic person like they decribed him in the poem.In conclusion if you only read the poem then you will only see paul revere as the unique hero.
Paul Revere was not a unique hero before the battle of Lexington. Beside the poem the The Belknap Letter was more specific and gave more details it express more emotion.One detail of evidence is .“In the fall of 1774 and the winter of 1775, I was a member of a group of 30 people”. Also it mentions“c.The Belknap letter was written by himself and it did not describe him as the heroic person like in the poem.If you read the whole letter paul revere wrote you would change your mind since how he discibe that night was diffrent than how they discibe in the poem.In conclusion if you read the Belknap letter only then you wouldn’t think paul is a unique hero.
These are the quotes that i’m going to use to prove that paul revere wasn’t a unique hero before the battle of Lexington.“In the fall of 1774 and the winter of 1775, I was a member of a group of 30 people”.“In the fall of 1774 and the winter of 1775, I was a member of a group of 30 people”. The Belknap letter was written by himself.In conclusion if you read both the belkmap letter and the poem you can deside if paul revere was not a unique hero before the battle of Lexington.