Many consider Obama to be an intelligent person and are willing to listen to him. However, even a great leader like Obama paid attention to an older and experienced person: his father. Obama’s father was a political extremist, which ultimately led to his assassination. By paying attention to his more experienced father, Obama was able to learn that extremity is destroying. Obama was able to learn from his father’s mistake and rectify it by realizing that compromise is the best way to go about things. Even today in his presidency, Obama employs compromise when dealing with foreign policy or the passage of certain laws. So, by paying attention to people older and more experienced than us we will be able to learn from their good deeds or mistakes.
While Obama paid attention to his father’s experience to become a successful politician, Wilhelm II, Kaiser of Germany in the late 1800’s, failed to listen to his wiser chancellor, thereby leading to Germany’s fall and World War I. Bismarck, Wilhelm II’s chancellor, had more political experience and diplomacy than the amateur Wilhelm II, who was very impulsive and unintelligent. However, Wilhelm did not pay much attention to Bismarck’s advice on how to run the country. Wilhelm ignored Bismarck and acted according to his own rules, ultimately leading to the frustrated Bismarck’s resignation. Ever since then, Wilhelm’s unwise moves led Germany to its downfall and set up the stage for the first World War. This example clearly shows how ignoring experienced people had been harmful in the past and serves as a lesson for us so that we do not repeat history.
While there are many people who are not worthy of listening to, there is no harm in paying attention to their experiences. It could help us learn from their mistakes and fix our lifestyle, as well as prevent future destruction. Ultimately, it is our choice whether to listen to these people or not. Therefore, we can make the decision of listening to the wise people and not listening to the unwise people.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…
- 589 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Otto Von Bismarck worked on the two issues, unification of Germany and isolation of France (Germany's mortal enemy). He believed that as long as Britain, Russia and Italy were assured of the peaceful nature of the German Empire, the French could be contained. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s style of working and understanding of foreign relations strengthened and unified other European powers against Germany in time for World War I. There are numerous examples of how reversal in policies of Wilhelm II acted as a catalyst to trigger off sensitive issues such as militarism, nationalism, imperialism and caused imbalance in the alliances leading to the onset of The First World War.…
- 394 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Wilhelm had an enormous influence over the chancellor’s he chose. Mainly because he believed that they would do as he told and abide by what he said. This control over his chancellor’s allowed him to set the agenda and manipulate them into doing exactly what he wanted. In 1892, Caprivi proposed legislation that would restore some of the church’s privileges over education, effectively reversing an important aspect of the Kulturkampf. However, Wilhelm had no intention of relying on the Centre Party to pass the bill therefore forced the withdrawal of the proposed legislation. The fact Wilhelm had such control over his chancellor’s shows that he had personal rule to an extent as he could basically propose what policies he wanted. If they failed in doing so, they could be easily replaced.…
- 820 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the nineteenth century, Germany was struggling to unify after the failure of the Frankfort Assembly of 1848, which was meant to unify Germany. In 1862, William I, formerly known as Frederick William IV, was appointed king of the military state known as Prussia. As a result of disputes from the rising middle class, William I choose to hire Otto von Bismarck as chancellor in order to quiet the unrest. Otto von Bismarck was a realpolitik, someone whose decisions were based on practicality, not morals. The policies of Otto von Bismarck’s government represented the new kind of conservatism because they represented realpolitik through doing what’s best for the country by incorporating the growing idea of socialism into reforms, all while valuing…
- 1147 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In Germany the Kaiser Wilhelm II had rid himself of Bismark and his conservative foreign policy of diplomacy and avoidance of conflict, with a rash and belligerent quest for glory.…
- 1180 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Looking back at the events that occurred during our history, particularly during World War II, many of the people often reflect back and ask the question, ‘Who let a man like Hitler come into power or what made the German people decide to follow him? The seeds of Hitler's rise to power were planted following the outcome of the First World War. Hitler’s rise to power was not inevitable. It depended heavily on a range of factors, events and circumstances.…
- 1568 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The reasons for Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor in 1933 have been debated heavily by a number of Historians. Causes, ranging from Germany’s authoritarian historical background and the effects of World War One on German Society to Hitler’s very own charisma as a leader and speaker, have all been considered as reasons for his lucky ascent into power. Yet there is no denying that for all Hitler’s charm, Nazi support by late 1932 was flailing and the people never actually elected him as Chancellor. So, this begs the question; why would Hindenburg (The German president at the time) choose to put Hitler, a man he had claimed to strongly dislike, into a position of power over the Reichstag and the German people? Although there are many long term reasons for Hindenburg’s decision; a shared miscalculation by certain groups of people in power can be seen as a very important cause.…
- 2322 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Although Germany ultimately became a powerful nation and yearned for European peace, Otto von Bismarck developed alliance mechanisms and he maintained Germany’s leadership in national affairs, previously Bismarck was fired by William II Germany began a pursuit to expand which angered other European countries, once shot was fired, alliances tightened and the First World War began. Otto von Bismarck’s methods to keep peace in Europe, impacted the power of Germany as a nation. Young Emperor William II dismissed Bismarck which generated the Rival Blocs, separating Europe. Subsequently Serbian revolutionaries assassinated Austria’s heir to the throne, and a war which was suppose to “clear the air” lasts for four years. The many alliances and enemies triggered World War One.…
- 907 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
However, Prussia realized Germany’s vulnerability, seeing how its loose union and its central geographical spot in the continent made it vulnerable to attack from strong neighbors like France and Russia. So, Prussia set out to unify Germany to form one large, stronger state. However, this unification could not have been possible without Otto von Bismarck, a Prussian noble who had risen through the ranks to become a major political figure and the driving force behind German unification. The question is begged, however: how did Bismarck do it? How did he rise to power and unite these fragmented pieces into one union? Well, for one, Bismarck had connections. A noble by birth, Bismarck had high social standing, but no governmental or military background that would facilitate a career in politics. Nonetheless, he befriended two military generals by the names of Helmut von Moltke and Albrecht von Roon. Moltke and Roon, both cunning military minds and dedicated ideologues, rose up the Prussian power ladder. In 1859, Roon was appointed minister of war, allowing him a direct link to the king. A strong believer in Bismarck’s potential, Roon lobbied the king to appoint Bismarck to a high post. It was a success, and in September 1862, Bismarck was appointed minister-president. Now that Bismarck had reached high office, it was up to him to use his power wisely. This is where Bismarck’s political cunning comes into play. Soon after receiving his position, Bismarck began winning the king over. Within a short while, Bismarck…
- 416 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This balancing act, however, angered true liberals because Bismarck had mixed their ideas with his conservatism, thus contaminated their previously apparent, separate ideologies. They also criticized his nationalism because his domestic policies would be problematic in the long run-- and these liberals would later be proven correct (Doc 7). Though Bismarck as a genius at balancing the forces against him, the balancing act could only last so long. Soon, Bismarck was fired and the old Kaiser died, leaving Kaiser Wilhelm II to disband most of Bismarck’s policies and inevitably cause World War One. During Bismarck’s time as Prime Minister, he had to balance his foreign affairs as well. In order to do that, he created an alliance system with the two powers surrounding him, Austria and Russia. However, after Bismarck was fired, Wilhelm II disbanded the alliance with Russia, and France quickly allied in Germany's place. After this shift in alliance, Serbian radicals decided to assassinate the Austrian heir. In a vengeful rage, Austria went after Serbia and was thus backed up by Germany. Serbia was backed up by Russia and was thus backed up by France. Then, England joined France’s side and World War One began because the men after Bismarck couldn’t handle what Bismarck had previously…
- 1141 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The historical interpretation of Otto von Bismarck and Bismarckian Germany has undergone extensive transformation, as historians have had access to a wider variety of sources and evidence, and have held differing social and political presuppositions influencing their portrayal of the German unifier. The changing historical interpretations can be seen over time, as differing contexts and sources influence the portrayal, as early interpretations of Bismarck from the 1870s to the 1920s portrayed Bismarck as a man in charge and as a necessity for Germany to move forward. The interpretation of Bismarck continued to change throughout the 1930s and 40s as a result of Nazism and the collapse of the Third Reich, the interpretations shifted, and throughout the 1960s, 70s and 80s the interpretation of Bismarck has become more balanced, not significantly influenced by political desires, whilst still influenced by social context. Through the study of historical debate focussing between the 1880s and 1980s, the changing interpretations of Bismarck can be illuminated and assessed.…
- 4452 Words
- 18 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Treaty of Versailles was a monumental stage in German history, helping to shape German history for arguably the best part of thirty years. It can be argued that the Treaty was the most significant event since the unification of Germany in 1890. The short term consequences were also highly prominent as over 300,000 Germans fled to America in the years 1917-23. Moreover many Germans were aggrieved by the Treaty, this lead to public exploits (Kapp Putsch and Munich Putsch) that lead to casualties accumulating into the 1000’s. With so much death and despair in Germany in the 1920’s the Treaty of Versailles effectively crippled Germany both economically and mentally. Furthermore the effects did not only stretch to the late 20’s, Hitler used the Treaty as a major campaigning point to secure chancellorship in 1933. Hitler still held severe indignations over the Treaty of Versailles and still held a personal vendetta with the parent countries that imposed such harsh terms on Germany in 1917. Although the Treaty of Versailles was a pivotal stage in shaping German history there are other corresponding factors such as the erection of the Berlin wall in 1961, consequently perpetually separating East and West Berlin for 28 years. After the wall came down in 1989, Germany became reunified in 1990, arguably the most significant turning point in German history as it enabled Germany to prosper as a whole nation, since then Germany has gone on to establish itself as a world superpower, both militarily and economically. It is difficult to come to a definitive answer on what the biggest turning point is, however I plan to analyse pivotal points in German history, dating from 1917-1990.…
- 2240 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In his monograph, Woodrow Wilson, Arthur S. Link discusses the President of the United States' influence on the world, his choices during his time in office, and the effect of his life on the world today. Link argues that Wilson shaped the way World War I played out in three important ways. First, Wilson advocated for peace and avoidance of interference in international conflicts. Second, he believed strongly in keeping the nation secure and keep the war handled fairly with the principle of neutrality firmly in mind. Although he fought at length to avoid involvement in World War I, Wilson decided to enter the war based on his ideas for neutrality and to bring the war to a close. Finally, Link argues that because Woodrow Wilson maintained a strong sense of peace and security for the American people, the actions of the president on behalf of the people and the country at that time were well justified. Using the writings of Woodrow Wilson himself and the correspondences of those he kept in touch with, Link finds evidence enough for his claims.…
- 473 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Nazi party was slowly making its ascent into the whirlwind world of politics; at first glance they appeared to be making no progress, due to this they were paid very little attention. The government’s negligence of the party allowed them to grow gradually and undetected. Although their popularity contributed to Hitler`s appointment as Chancellor, it can be argued that there were more dominant factors that assisted Hitler in his rise to power. The prematurity of the government is often seen as the underlying factor; however some historians argue that the actions of Hindenburg, Von Papen and the desperation gave Hitler the final push in the direction of chancellorship.…
- 1552 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Paying attention to detail is very important. If you are told to do something a specific way, the best thing that you can do is exactly what you were told. There is always a reasoning behind everything you do. Paying attention to detail in the Corrections environment is very important, especially if it has to do with a certain way of completing tasks inside the institutions. If a seasoned officer tells you to do something as a new officer, its probably something that will either make it easier for you or save your life. Sometimes you don’t always agree with what you are told, so the best thing you can do is just complete the task and handle it later with that person. My personal experiences with paying attention to detail brings me back to when I was overseas in Iraq. Me being a new graduate straight out of Boot Camp was one of the biggest challenges. Especially being over there with a group of people whom I know nothing about. Once I met my team leader, he explained to me how he likes to run his truck and his expectations for me. Everyday before we went out on missions, we were told the Intel for the day in the area we were going to be traveling. If we didn’t pay close attention to the hot spots, or target areas for IED’s, we could be putting all our lives at risk. So yes, paying attention to detail is very important, especially if you were in my shoes as the Lead Gunner on our convoys. Everyday I had to pay close attention to every bit of information given to me because my eyes up in the turret were what got everyone of my team members home alive after that year. There was nothing more stressful than knowing that If I slightly missed or didn’t pay attention to one little thing, or overlook anything, I could have put multiple lives at risk. Having on my conscious that everyone of my team members came home alive because of me paying attention to detail is something I am proud to be able to say. In conclusion, paying…
- 421 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays