On an unrelated note, I have been going through the PEP estimates on my thesis data and they have held up well under further scrutiny. I also applied a transformation Gery taught us to our PEP scores to account for the influence that heart rate can have on them, increased heart rate has been shown to naturally decrease PEP. After the transformation, I reran the main analyses and still found the same main effect for evocativeness as before the transformation. My plan currently is to continue looking through more cases to ensure accuracy before rerunning all analyses containing PEP again and sending them your way. …show more content…
When analysing the data in 60 second time intervals there is a lack of a distinctive B notch in most cases because there are fewer cycles to create the average waveforms from. I was previously using the Mindware's default B notch estimation method for these cases but learned a different formula at the conference that is more accurate at estimating the B notch in cases such as these. Unfortunately, this means it is going to take me a bit longer to get the analyses concerning fatigue induction and time to you than I previously expected. I am still hoping to get you them to you in a timely manner, but I think it might be smart for me to focus on getting my thesis analyses redone and the paper for Sam done before turning my focus to them. This is, of course, unless you have any objections to that