Preview

Personal Experience

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Personal Experience
September 29, 2010
COMPLAINT INFORMATION

I’m filing a complaint about my termination of employment that took place on September 10, 2010.

On August 29, 2010 I was given a final write up by David Bauer, weekend supervisor. David gave me a copy and read over the write up with me and asked me to sign it. (See attached write up). I did not sign it and told David that I didn’t agree with any of the accusations listed.

In reference to the observed behavior section on the write up, 1A, I told David, “Whenever you ask me to work a certain station I always follow directions.” “As far as having to ask to move to a different station, I didn’t know that’s what was stated in the S.O.P., (standard operating procedures), guidelines”. We’ve always been told to chase or follow the work. In reference to the Define a Solution on the write up, 1B, nowhere in the S.O.P.’s does it state that you are to work at a station until relived or instructed to work at another station, nor does the S.O.P.’s state that at all times there must be one smasher to one qc’er or two smashers and two qc’ers. There’s a lot of inaccurate information on the write up I received. Ex, there’s been many times when there were two people smashing and only one qc’er. On August 28, 2010 Glenn Powell and I were smashing and there was only one qc’er.
In reference to the observed behavior section on the write up, 2A, in any work environment I have a very positive and professional attitude. In reference to 2B, David Bauer has held meetings with our entire team where he displayed inappropriate behaviors, using profanity, talking to team members in a derogatory manner, threatening and belittling our work.

When I didn’t sign the write up David Bauer told me that I would be receiving a call on Monday August 30, 2010 from Tad Timmler, Photo Books production manager or Tarja Dye, Human Resource Director, to set up a date and time to have a meeting with me. Two weeks had gone by and I never received a call from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Facts: The Plaintiff Zelma Mitchell was terminated on June 4, 1974, for alleged misconduct from the Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc. Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits on June 12, 1974, she was denied these benefits finding that Mitchells act were constituted as misconduct. Being denied disqualified her for…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: (Only list the relevant facts that apply to the issue). The Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc. terminated Mrs. Mitchell on June 4, 1974 for ‘misconduct.’ On June 12, 1974, Mrs. Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation benefits and was initially disqualified from seven weeks of benefits by the Unemployment Security Commission. Mrs. Mitchell filed an appeal, the Appeal Tribunal reversed the Unemployment Security Commission’s decision and Mrs. Mitchell’s benefits were reinstated. On September 13, 1974, the Lovington Good Samaritan Center appealed the decision and the Commission overruled the Appeal Tribunal and reinstated the seven week disqualification period. Mrs. Mitchell then applied for and was granted certiorari (a writ or order by which a higher court reviews a decision of a lower court) from the decision and ordered the benefits reinstated.…

    • 340 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CASE Brief

    • 978 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rodman was reprimanded in June 1986 for receiving an inordinate number of personal telephone calls and visitors at her work station, which was disruptive to her own work and to her co-workers. Rodman was to have no personal telephone calls during work hours outside of a designated break or dinner time, in which event they were to occur in an area not visible to patients, physicians, or other department staff. When leaving the department for dinner, Rodman was to report to her immediate supervisor and was not to leave the hospital. Rodman was to make every effort to resolve the matters in her personal life that were causing problems at work. Nevertheless, according to the testimony of her supervisor, extremely disruptive telephone calls continued. The doctors were beginning to comment on it. The staff was getting more distressed. According to her supervisor, “[A]gain we talked about the visits, the behavior at the desk. When it got pretty bad with the phone calls, Billie would slam charts, push chairs and be a little abrupt with the people she worked with.” Another written reprimand in November of 1986 warned Rodman that her job was in jeopardy if the disruptive behavior continued. The supervisor established restrictions prohibiting the claimant from having visitors at the department and instructed her to notify security if there was a potential problem.…

    • 978 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the employer, the Department has the burden of proof in a discharge claim (Holly, Jennings & Wolters, 2012, p. 467). It is not enough to have a good case. A party may frequently lose a case because “they fail to bring proof of their allegations” or fail to support their arguments with proof (Isrealstam, 2014, para. 1). In reviewing management’s case it is evident that they provided adequate proof with their strong opening statement, various exhibits, unbiased witnesses, and strong closing statements that warranted the termination of Mr. Chuckles for clear violations of numerous company…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Wednesday October 5, 2016, Mr Rudolph Taite was scheduled to meet with Wellness coach to complete a service plan amendment. Wellness Coach asked Mr. Taite how was his day it answered “Well”. Wellness coach answered okay, that is good. Mr. Taite pulled out a seat and asked wellness coach “am I assigned to you” ? Wellness coach responded “yes”. Mr. Taite added that he did not want to be disrespected and Wellness coach encouraged him that this is a safe space and no one is here to judge nor disrespect you. Mr. Taite refused to complete service plan amendment and proceeded out the door while saying he has a copy with the corrections on it.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trevino Case Study

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (H) Why is my supervisor Mr. Christopher Cox and director Major Javier Trevino has taken this situation to such a great length to accuse me of telling a story when they know I didn’t? (It seem as if they have fusing deceitful and negative documentations on me to try to fire me).…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    BSBMGT502B Webinar 2

    • 1265 Words
    • 9 Pages

     This was sent to the HR Dept. and Sam called and verified receipt.  3 days after your meeting with Sam you advised your Supervisor that Sam had struck you and had reported ill.  Meeting with HR held and Sam was dismissed.  Sam filed for unfair dismissal with the AIRC (now Fair Work Australia). …

    • 1265 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law and Biddy S Tea

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In July 2010 Miss. Attired filed and was denied unemployment compensation because she was terminated due to “misconduct”.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am filing this complaint against Judge Mark Gross .He presides at the Los Angeles Superior Court ..,in Los Angeles County in Dept 2 D.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SOC 315 Week 5 DQs

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Click the About the EEOC link and select Newsroom . Select a press release about an employee lawsuit published within the last 6 months.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Click the About the EEOC link and select Newsroom . Select a press release about an employee lawsuit published within the last 6 months.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Click the About the EEOC link and select Newsroom. Select a press release about an employee lawsuit published within the last 6 months.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Personal conduct is also expected to be appropriate as disruptive or aggressive conduct will affect the performance of the work team meaning targets may be missed or team members will be in conflict.…

    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    experience

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The following scenario addresses a scenario and case law on privacy protections in entertainment venues.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2.) The conduct was severe, pervasive, and regarded by the claimant as so hostile or offensive as to alter his or her conditions of employment; and…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays