innocent. I’d like to bring to the table that the boy screamed “I’m going to kill you.”
How many of us yell something like that to our parents? The phrase “I’m going to kill
you” is said then the father ends up dead the same night just a couple hours later. I
doubt that is a coincidence.
The older gentleman who lives downstairs from the crime scene claimed to hear the
young boy yell at his father hours before the crime happened. It is unlikely he could
have heard it with the el train passing by at the exact same moment …show more content…
It is also unlikely that the older gentleman could have been able to identify
the young boy’s voice and the exact words. An oncoming train makes quite a lot of
noise. Even if the older gentleman could tell someone was saying something, there is no
way he could have made out a full sentence and voice. The old gentleman could have
been under an oath when claiming he heard the boy. If the man had convinced himself
enough to kill the boy over it, or was immoral enough to lie in order to kill the kid in
the electric chair. There’s no reason for him not to say it under oath. Second coincidence
is the murder weapon. It was the same one the boy had purchased hours before the
killing. It was a switchblade which is an illegal possession. The boy claims he had lost
it within a few hours of death of his father. While true, this is circumstantial. The
weapon was not unique, and are no fingerprints on it. The fact remains is that this boy
had the knife, lost the knife and then the murder weapon was the same. Even if it was
easy to obtain it does not show the sheer coincidence that murder weapon were the
same and the boy had just ‘lost’ it. How often do you lose a weapon? If you have a
weapon then keep safe guard as protection or used as a threat. He may not have