Andrew Phelvin article, “Winterbourne View Hospital and the Social Psychology of Abuse” compares the ideas of a social psychologist, Phillip Zimbardo, to different experiments that have happened over the years. The focus of the scholarly journal is the Winterbourne View hospital situation that happened in early 2011. He briefly summarizes the reason as to why the hospital is included in his article. A BBC reporter secretly filmed the Winterbourne View Hospital in 2011. This caught on film the abuse of residents in the hospital who suffered from mental illness. Phelvin also talks speaks about two other events that are similar to the Winterbourne view mistreatment. The Stanford Prison Experiment in particular continues the steady theme of controversial psychological experiments. Phelvin includes definitions of behavior that people who are involved in these experiments may have stimulated within them. Dispositional factors are when the personality traits or the motives of people change from the different circumstances at which they are involved. When they are free to choose their choices may become deeper desires that they want to do but not always morally right. This idea specially connects with…
Your example with the nurse reminded me of another unpleasant situation Susannah and her father, Tom, experienced. At the end of chapter 31, The Big Reveal, Susannah was in tears from being spectated by strangers and commentaries from the young physician’s regarding of a possible oophorectomy (p.159-160). The young man who led the group did not even apologize for disturbing Susannah and Tom, instead, he quickly fled from the room. Even though the young physician may justify his actions for educational purposes, his actions were invasive and left a negative impact on Susannah and her father. As therapists, we should be considerate of our clients’ conditions and display a high level of professionalism.…
The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…
In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…
My first impression from watching the film was the relationship between the study’s prisoners and guards seemed friendly at first. Though they’re encouraged by Zimbardo and his associates to take the experiment seriously and to invest themselves fully in their roles, the subjects initially still understand that they’re not really in a prison but then, the experiment takes a turn when a guard named Christopher Archer begins to embrace a meaner personality one, in which I suspect from watching the experiment, is not his normal demeanor but, rather, a more boosted version of himself of which he perceives to be his role. Archer introduces an element of meanness to the proceedings, altering the prisoners’ mindset the prisoners start to feel dehumanization…
What followed was an investigation into human nature. Prisoners experienced extreme degradation, punishment, despair, oppression and depression as they began to wholly believe they were prisoners. The guards took their role quite seriously as they strictly enforced the law and asserted their given power and authority. The Stanford Prison Experiment, which was supposed to last for two weeks, ended after six days when researchers realized that guards were becoming incredibly abusive and that the prisoners were beginning to forget that they were not actual prisoners.…
Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…
Zimbardo’s Prison Study was a highly controversial experiment, infamous for its questionable ethics. This type of study would not be able to be recreated again mainly due to current APA standards. It can be argued as well that this experiment violated ethics standards of its time as well.…
Why does the prison doctor endeavor not to know the crimes his patients have committed? Do you think this is wise? Why or why not? It makes him feel safer not knowing the…
While the Stanford Prison Experiment was originally expected to last 14 days, it had to be stopped after just six due to what was happening to the student participants. The guards became abusive, and the prisoners began to show signs of extreme stress and anxiety. While the prisoners and guards were allowed to interact in any way they wanted, the interactions were hostile or even dehumanizing.…
24 volunteers were selected that had no psychological problems, health issues or any past crime accounts. They were brought to a mock prison set up in the basement of the Stanford university’s psychology building where they were randomly assigned to be prisoners or guards. 3 prisoners each were given rooms that they had to live in for 24 hours of the day and the guards were given 8 hour shifts to work in. the study was observed upon using cameras and microphones. They study was supposed to last for 14 days but had to be halted after 6 days due to extreme unethical practices in the prison.…
The prison experiment discussed in this video involves a group of male college students who were later spilt into two completely different roles, prisoners and guards. This experiment, done in Stanford University, was supposed to last two weeks, but only lasted about four to the duress and severity the “prisoners” were put through. Dr. Zimbardo conducted the experiment in such a manner where everything was realistic; they formed a mock prison in the basement of a psychology building, the students were arrested as if actual criminals, and they were given uniforms depending on whether they were prisoners or guards.…
References: 1) Arboleda-Florez, J. 2005. The Ethics of Biomedical Research on Prisoners. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 18, 514-517.…
The Abu Ghirab prison was the most horrific, brutal and dehumanizing thing I have even come across. The level of suffering the inmates experienced words cannot express how terrifying it is. There were male as well as female and even worst, children was in that dreadful place. They were treated worse than animals in my opinion, I cannot see in no one lives they should have to encounter such gruesome experience. The Stanford prison experiment was conducted on August 14th to 20th, 1971.The team of researchers were led by professor Phillip Zimbardo.This experiment was conducted with college students. This experiment was also dehumanizing although the prisoners were forced to engage in many events, such as defecating in buckets and used their hands…
“The conditions of confinement in today’s prisons and jails have many of the same attributes that were of concern to the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research in the range of 30 years back. Yet essential new elements have risen that oblige attention” ("Ncbi: Ethical Considerations For Research Involving Prisoners: ", 2007).…