Preview

Philosophy comparing libertarianism, compatibilism, and determinism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2349 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy comparing libertarianism, compatibilism, and determinism
Comparing Determinism, Compatibilism, and Libertarianism
Patrick C Smith
Ivy Tech Community College

The question that the textbook poses at the very beginning of chapter four is, “Are you Free” (Chaffee, 2013, p. 172)? Most people would look at this question as pretty cut and dry and would answer a resounding yes. Philosophically speaking, it is not that easy of an answer. You have to be willing to look at the question with an open mind, and ask yourself if the choices you make are truly free or if they are governed by forces outside of your control. In the following paper I intend to compare and contrast the three major philosophical viewpoints regarding this question, and come to a conclusion on which I find to be the right answer. I believe the best way to do this is to first lay out the beliefs of each viewpoint. Once I have done this I can compare them, and give my insight on which I believe to be right. The first viewpoint regarding human freedom is determinism. The thesis of the determinist is that, “Every event (including human actions) has a cause, and the chain of causes leading to any given action by an agent extends back in time to some point before the agent was born” (Koons, 2002, p. 81). This means that there is no such thing as free will, and that there is only one choice we could ever make “The determinist view of human freedom is typically based off of the scientific model of the physical universe” (Chaffee, 2013, p. 176). They believe that since events in the physical universe as well as the biological realm consistently display casual connections, and because humans are a part of the physical universe and biological realm, it is a reasonable assumption that all of our actions (and the choices that initiated the actions) are also casually determined, eliminating the possibility of free choice ( Chaffee, 2013, p. 176). Although, this doesn’t take into account the complex



References: Chaffee, J. (2013) The Philosopher’s Way. (4th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Smilansky, S. (2007, October) Determinism and Prepunishment: The Radical Nature of Compatibilism Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.columbus.libproxy.ivytech.edu.allstate.libproxy.ivytech.edu/ehost/detail?vid=5&sid=8fb7b398-f28d-49e4-bbf1-48c648f96700%40sessionmgr4&hid=14&bdata=JmxvZ2luLmFzcCZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmU%3d#db=aph&AN=26685054 Boaz, D. (1999, January 1) Key Concepts of Libertarianism Retrieved from http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/key-concepts-libertarianism Koons, J.R.. (2002) Is Hard Determinism a Form of Compatibilism? Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.columbus.libproxy.ivytech.edu.allstate.libproxy.ivytech.edu/ehost/detail?vid=7&sid=8fb7b398-f28d-49e4-bbf1-48c648f96700%40sessionmgr4&hid=14&bdata=JmxvZ2luLmFzcCZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmU%3d#db=aph&AN=6374002

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the main questions that we face is whether or not, we as humans have genuine freedom. Are we free to make our own choices? Do we decide what happens in our lives in the future? Or are our lives set pathways in which we have no say at all? Are all our choices already decided? In other words, do we have free will or are our actions pre-determined, or both? Hard determinists, libertarians and soft determinists all set out to provide answers to these questions, holding different views on whether or not free will and determinism are compatible. Both hard determinists and libertarians believe that free will and determinism are incompatible but hard determinists reject the idea of free will whereas libertarians support the idea of free will and reject determinism. On the other hand, soft determinists believe that free will and determinism are in fact compatible.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is much debate over the issue of whether we have complete freedom of the will or if our will caused by something other than our own choosing. There are three positions adopted by philosophers regarding this dispute: determinism, libertarianism, and compatibilism. Determinists believe that freedom of the will does not exist. Since actions are events that have some predetermined cause, no actions can be chosen and thus there is no will to choose. The compatibilist argues that you can have both freedom of the will and determinism. If the causes which led to our actions were different, then we could have acted in another way which is compatible with freedom of the will. Libertarians believe that freedom of the will does exist.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism, for those that are religious the decision they make them believe it’s be ordain by their decisions. But if you think about it, whatever ‘free-will’ choices we make that path has been destine to occur, if we chooses wrong, or right, or the alternative of right and wrong, or non-religious path what waits us, seem to be somewhat ordain by our discussion where it was ‘free-will’ of self-interest, or of religiously –“free will”. Determinism, seems to be like a line game they use to determine the path of result of one will do, well in terms of one of school.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    concept that humans have free will and are conscious of their existence and the decisions…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chisholm and Free Will

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Before I begin it is pertinent to note the disparate positions on the problem of human freedom. In "Human Freedom and the Self", Roderick M. Chisholm takes the libertarian stance which is contiguous with the doctrine of incompatibility. Libertarians believe in free will and recognize that freedom and determinism are incompatible. The determinist also follow the doctrine of incompatibility, and according to Chisholm's formulation, their view is that every event involved in an act is caused by some other event. Since they adhere to this type of causality, they believe that all actions are consequential and that freedom of the will is illusory. Compatiblist deny the conflict between free will and determinism. A.J. Ayer makes a compatibilist argument in "Freedom and Necessity".…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A very wise man once says, "God versus Man, Man versus God, God versus Nature, Nature versus God, Man versus Nature, Nature versus Man." These six battles constitute an ultimately greater battle: the battle of free will versus determinism. Free will is the ability for a human being to make decisions as to what life he or she would like to lead and have the freedom to live according to their own means and choose their own destiny.…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines philosophical determinism as “the belief that all events are caused by things that happened before them and that people have no real ability to make choices or control what happens; a theory or doctrine that acts of the will, occurrences in nature, or social or psychological phenomena are causally determined by preceding events or natural laws; a belief in predestination, the quality or state of being determined” (1). Does this mean that whatever action we make is a choice that doesn’t belong to us, but is rather a result of complex events that surround us? Do people have a right to justify some of their actions, and can be excused due to an idea that they do not act voluntarily?…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gary Gutting, the author of the article, What Makes Free Will Free? deliberates that we do not have free choice as we assumed which a researcher confirmed. By free choice, this means the conviction that our conduct is dictated by our own unrestrained choice and that we have complete power over our activities. Also, Gary Gutting examined various thoughts on determinism as the researchers suggested. Determinism refers to the conviction that all human conduct or any other occurrences have a cause. This is opposed to a person's will to accomplish an action. Gary Gutting discussed what David Hume, a philosopher, believed and the belief of David Hume is that both determinism and free choice are possible, they are compatible with each…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Free will: the philosophical assumption that individuals can dictate their own lives free of any social constraint or external factors.…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that free will is true in saying, the idea that humans can freely choose their actions rather than all our lives being predetermined like the way determinist believe. Determinist think free will is just simply an illusion, and that our thoughts come from our background, and we are unaware as to which we strive no conscious control. As Sam Harris philosopher, claims that our thoughts and desires impose instinctive circumstances that define the character of your consciousness in that moment.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causal Determinist

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Freedom, Determinism, and Causality, by Sober, it mentions three views of freedom: hard determinism, libertarian, and soft determinism. Being a hard determinist means you do not have free will, an incompatibilist, and causal determinist. Libertarians are free and incompatibilist; soft determinist are people that say that we do have free will and are causal determinism. An incompatibilist has many options and is free to pick any one of the choices. A causal determinist is when events turn out the same even if you go back in time. In this essay I am going to argue that we should be hard determinist because we do not have free will to choose our genes and environment.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I personally believe that we as human beings are given free will. For instance, lets say there is an all omniscient God and lets say he knows what we will do and what our destiny is but he sends you a problem to over come such as,…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has been said that the conscious mind is like a monkey riding a tiger of subconscious decisions while attempting to make up illusions that they are in control. This can be a rather dreary thought. If this were true, then free will would merely be a complex illusion created by the human mind to differentiate humans from common animals. Luckily there are several different options when it comes to free will. Soft determinism is the best way to describe humanity’s level of free will using examples from The Adjustment Bureau, Minority Report and The New York Times Free Will article.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other theories use determinism as support; however, using free will by itself provides a clear and accurate depiction of how decisions are made. The libertarian perspective proves that free will exists and the only cause for actions is choosing to commit the action. The theory does not leave room for prior factors, which leave people wondering what exactly the prior factors…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays