Preview

Philosophy of Punishment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1240 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophy of Punishment
Punishment In Plato’s The Republic, Socrates has many conversations with people in order to further understand concepts such as justice and the way things are ideally supposed to be done. When I think about justice the definition that comes to mind is: the administration of a just action because of an unjust or immoral act being done by a human or group of humans. The issue of proper punishment has also been discussed in those conversations with Socrates and his peers. There must be a punishment for immoral or unjust actions committed by any human otherwise everything in our world would turn into complete chaos. In Socrates’s time people believed heavily in the afterlife and that his or her actions on Earth determined the quality of that life. The gods played a huge role in deciding the fates of everyone depending on how one lived while one was alive. If one lived an unjust and reckless life then it will show because the gods in one’s afterlife will punish him or her. Socrates states, “…bad people are wretched because they are in need of punishment, and that in paying the penalty they are benefited by that god.” There is a problem with waiting until the afterlife for people to be punished because then there would be no order in society. Bad people who are actually bad can get away with living well in the afterlife because during their Earthly life they gained enough wealth to pay the gods to give them a good afterlife. Meanwhile the good people of the world who did a bad thing maybe once or twice will be wrongly punished in the afterlife. In order for everyone to get what he or she deserves, they need to be punished while they are still alive. The way the societies keep everything in line is by appointing government personnel and juries. The appointed officials are given the task of creating fair and reasonable laws that are possible for all to follow. If those laws are broken, it is at that point when the perpetrator is given a punishment that correlates


Cited: Plato. Republic. Translated by C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett 2004. -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. Plato, Republic, trans. C.D.C. Reeves (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2004) 61. [ 2 ]. Plato, Republic, 11. [ 3 ]. Plato, Republic, 12.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Reasons Of Adnan's Motive For Killing Hae
    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Reasons Of Adnan's Motive For Killing Hae

    Adnan is not guilty because the evidence against him wasn’t strong. Adnan didn’t have a clear motive to kill Hae, wouldn’t have been able to kill Hae in the twenty one minutes, wasn’t with Jay when the Nisha call happened, and didn’t have a fair trial. If there wasn’t enough evidence to put Adnan away, then they shouldn’t have convicted him. The state had said Adnan’s motive for killing Hae was because he was heartbroken and wanted revenge for the pain she had caused him.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Punishment
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of Punishment

    As previously mentioned, if the punishment is not harsh enough the result is repeated offense. If a criminal relishes in committing a crime and the court system does not properly punish them for it, then they actually have no reason not to repeat the crime over again. The National Institute of Justice, part of the U.S department of Justice, studied how likely criminals are to relapse after being released, claiming that “Within five years of release, about three-quarters (76.6 percent) of released prisoners were rearrested” (Durose, Cooper, and Howard). This statistic proves that there is a significant chance that a criminal will indeed carry out the same action as before. The most significant way that an offender is punished is through what…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Justice In Plato's The Republic
    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justice In Plato's The Republic

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Justice In The Republic
    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Role Of Justice In The Republic

    Justice is a concept that has changed and developed throughout history. The foundation of the modern justice system in the western world began in Athens just over two thousand years ago. Many philosophers had their own conceptions about what justice truly is, however, Plato proved to be the most influential. Before Plato, many men shared Polemarchus’ belief that justice meant giving good to friends and evil to enemies. In his book, The Republic, Plato sets out to define the true definition of justice. Plato states that justice is when men to put aside irrational desires for the greater good of society. If civilization were to follow Polemarchus’ view of justice, society would become anarchy. People would punish those that have wronged them…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Socrates Considered Unjust
    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is Socrates Considered Unjust

    Socrates was a man of distinction and a man with strong ideas on how to make a more perfect society. Although a lot of his ideas conflict with his ability to be just or unjust it does not in his mind. Being just or unjust is a major topic in the book and there are many different ways of being both. Socrates used the terms, not necessarily the way we would normally use the term today, but parts of his depiction made sense. He said a lot of different things could be considered unjust. For example not doing what you were Destined to do or what you are best at is considered unjust in his mind.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing
    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    This paper is written in an attempt to comprehend the sentencing philosophy and purpose of criminal punishment through a review of the historical parameters concerning how sentencing and punishment serve society. Sentencing is the application of justice and the end result of a criminal conviction which is applied by the convening authority; followed by the sentence, or judgement of the court on a convicted offender. What makes punishment unique to our society is the application of our moral or ethical beliefs as a whole, and by the population at large. Throughout history, the sentencing and administration of punishments have been swift, brutal and often times ending with the death of the offender, but in our more civilized and modern society,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ultimate Punishment Analysis
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Ultimate Punishment Analysis

    While I may disagree with the conclusion of this essay, still more do I disagree with the way in which it has been supported and justified. The paper bleeds a haughty arrogance, like an aristocrat looking down his nose at the ignorant peasants, suggesting that one either "gets it" or does not. It relies heavily on circular logic, much as religion—I am right, because I am right, and therefore I am right. Touting the word "justice," and wielding other such noble words, van den Haag attempts to elevate his logic as "self-evident"—though clearly it is not, or this course would not exist. Much as I detest anything that attempts to classify a species so diverse and unique as the human race into…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ideas Of Punishment During The Post Enlightenment Era
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Ideas Of Punishment During The Post Enlightenment Era

    The ideas of punishment from the post enlightenment era, such as, vengeance, humiliation, and retaliation to deter the criminal and other members of society, from further criminal activity would best serve purpose as punishment for type one crimes that are planned and carried out. Crimes that are committed with malice such as burglary and first-degree murder are intentional crimes. These crimes require planning, violent acts, and harm to another. In my opinion, the severe punishment of the post enlightenment era would deter these crimes from happening, due to fear of severe and inhumane punishment. Crimes such as assault (type two) happen in the heat of the moment and are most likely reoccurring no matter what the punishment is.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophy
    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page

    Sentencing Philosophy

    Any individual that breaks the law is punished, a criminal penalty can be ranked from a small fine or community service to the death penalty, there’s no general agreement on how the courts should punish if the individual is guilty. Perhaps they’re five different types of philosophical principles that guides the sentencing in the United States: deterrence, rehabilitation, retribution, incapacitation, and restoration. These can differ in very important ways, some feel tension that punishment should fit the crime committed, but others believe that the punishment should fit the criminal. These points can influence the time about sentencing. Some people accept that they are consequences for having a criminal conduct. Finally, some of the consequences…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust
    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates Unjust

    This establishes that whether or not Socrates originally believes his punishment is right, by staying in Athens his entire life, he made a commitment to follow the law-being just-therefore, if he is accused of breaking the law and is convicted by the courts of Athens, which represent the law, then he must complete his sentence, or else he is only becoming more unjust. Socrates later decides that although he could escape, it is better to try and do the right thing, despite having done unjust things in the past, and ultimately decides to carry out his punishment. This passage also further examines the gray area within the idea of just and unjust by saying that following the laws is just; however, the people of the court who determine which acts are within the bounds the laws and which acts are not, are also biased according to their own personal perceptions, meaning no human truly knows the intransigent definitions of what is just and what is unjust.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Classical Era Punishment
    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Classical Era Punishment

    The Classical era ranges from 17th century to 18th century which is often referred as The Enlightenment era or The Age of Reasoning. The Classical era introduced a belief in the power of human reasoning to solve social, economic and political problems. The classical school teaches us that humans are rational and we make a choice to commit crimes and that punishment should be about preventing future crimes from happening. Before the 17th century, common forms of punishment consisted of torture and death as a way to get even with a criminal or one of the laws of Hammurabi: an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. The classical school of criminology came after the enlightenment. This period introduced the basic ideas of how to operate the…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophies
    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    Sentencing Philosophies

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are; retribution, this philosophy is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered, deterrence, this strategy is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender. Incapacitate is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment
    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment

    Punishment is described by the Webster Dictionary as ‘the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution to an offense’. Today, this definition may pass as true for many governments, but years ago when philosophers were discussing ideas about government and laws, one idea that stuck out was that of punishment. Different theories rose regarding justifying punishment, and deciding the purpose behind punishing people. Joel Feinberg, Jules Coleman, and Christopher Kutz are three philosophers that spent a lot of time discussing their beliefs and ideas about punishment.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Retribution Vs Incarceration
    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Retribution Vs Incarceration

    “The only way that we’re going to feel secure in this country again and that we’re going to feel good about ourselves is if we use these systems we’ve put into place to create positive change around the world. I really believe we can do that”(John Perkins). Sentencing and corrections have changed over the years. Before, the criminal justice system believed prison sentences were the only way to rehabilitate criminals, when in fact, it did the exact opposite. The judicial system began to see that the solutions they applied were not beneficial to the inmates.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crime and Punishment
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crime and Punishment

    Punishment is defined as the infliction of a penalty for an offense. The novel Crime and Punishment by Dostoevsky took place in St. Petersburg, Russia, mid 1860s. The main character, Raskolnikov, committed the murder of a pawn broker and her sister which he became ill with guilt. He is accused as the murderer but denied it until the end where he eventually confessed and was sent to Siberia. In the novel, Raskolnikov had an unbearable amount of guilt, faced punishment by imprisonment, and gave his heart to God for forgiveness. Conflicts he was put through helped illuminate the meaning of the novel: For all crimes, there will be punishment.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics