I think that computers can be taught how to process information like humans but I don’t think that it can fully think like humans. I feel like computers and its software are limited to human tendencies. I feel like the readings are focusing on basic human thinking whereas I am thinking about deep thought critical thinking. I think when it comes to basic things like typing, formulating answers, teaching a lesson or language, yes a computer can break down the words and meaning like we do, but I don’t think it can apply it to real life situations to fully understand how it applies.…
The program was created by machines that took over the planet. While in Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, a prisoner is able to comprehend the reality of the cave and the real one outside the cave.…
This quote is important because it allows me to understand the similar perspective that Matthew Antoine and Grant Wiggins have on what it is like for A black man in the south. Matthew seemed to have regretted staying in the south and not being anything or anybody there. Grant however, struggles with whether or not to stay or escape his roots and home. Both of the men appear to be bitter and cynical of the way they are treated unfairly. This Piece of advice was given to grant by his old teacher, before he died.…
As a well-known literary theorist, Fish is a contributor to the “Opinionator” column in the New York Times. Furthermore, he worked as a former professor at Duke University and Dean of Arts and Sciences at the University of Chicago. Throughout this article, Fish expresses his reservation of artificial intelligence systems’ cognitive abilities by explaining how Watson functions in actuality. The author furthermore attempts to shed light on the question of if Watson understands anything like human.…
Beth, I noticed the same views for the characters in the Star Trek episode we read about. The Materialism and Dualistic views that each had seemed straight forward and they gave me a better understanding of the views and what they entail. I also agree that no matter how complex a machine can get it is still a machine. I think back to my favorite toy as a child and instantly remember my needy little Ferby. I had felt responsible to teach it how to talk and do tricks. I didn’t understand at the time that it was just a little computer that was mimicking my instructions. I think the same can be said about Data in the story. I know it felt all types of emotions when it was going to get destroyed but ultimately I think it was portraying emotions…
Ralph Bennett and Jack Merridew were both very simple-minded at one point in their lives when the third year of high school had rolled around and the two fell for each other's best friend. Ralph was aware of Merridew's presence at this time, but never thought much of him. He just knew that the boy was incredibly tall for his age and had unique features that he hardly ever saw on anyone else he knew. He had never seen eyes like the ones that belonged to Merridew, eyes that were such a light blue that they almost appeared as gray. Merridew's stare was as cold as ice, and it made Ralph sure that if you kept looking at him for more than a few seconds, you would drop dead from fear.…
…as we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial…
I strongly disagree with Searle’s concept in “strong Al” which suggests that, indeed a well-programmed computer can function as a brain, due to their artificial intelligence that can even explain and understand what we cannot comprehend. In addition, he believes that computers do possess cognitive states. However, he objects using…
At the vanguard of computer technology is the development of artificial intelligence (AI) and the creation of living computer circuitry called "biochips." The development of "AI" requires the computer to make a jump in inference, a quantum leap over miscellaneous data, something a programmed machine has been unable to do. Literally, the computer must skip variables rather than measure each one. It is not quite a mirror of the human gestalt "aha" illunimation of a decision but…
I thought that Joseph Campbell was very thorough with his analogy, I especially liked how he said, computer chips are like religion, especially how all the little angels make the parts work in the computer chip itself. Likewise, we humans can liken ourselves to computers, in society most of everyone is following a system that leads to the end result, that is what appears on the computer screen itself; however, not all parts know what the other is doing; however, every working part leads to the same result with is a functioning…
Using computers as comparisons to the human mind, Lewis Thomas' "To Err is Human" stresses the importance of mistakes as a tool for action. He states that to err is what separates the human mind and superhuman, electronic minds. While computers have the capacity to produce an infinite amount of precise calculations, glitches and errors will still be made, and the corrections made by humans. He mentions that the knack of being wrong is "a uniquely human gift" and that it should be used as "a guide for action." Thomas stresses the significance of error as a motivation to illicit the appropriate response ‑ correction ‑ in order to know.…
Strong Artificial intelligence: A functionalist theory that says that computers can be programmed to think.…
Obviously, Data was easily shut down in one scene by the simple turning off of his system, so it seems fitting to assume that is a case where the computer operator over rided the computer's functions. Maddox views Data strictly as a machine, an "it" to be analyzed, controlled, and replicated.…
Even though some users know or have an idea to believe that Julia is a computer, many users struggle with establishing this distribution. Turkle display this hardship by including excerpts of certain conversions people were having with Julia and they continuously raised the question. This is because computer programs had become perfectly designed to be able to communicate as if they had their own mind. For this reason, many people began to not care if she was human or not because she provided the comfort elements that they were missing in reality. Many users confided in Julia and told her their deepest wants and desires.…
In the article “Can Computers Think,” John Searle makes the claim that computers, while they can simulate understanding or emotions, cannot think in the same way that a human mind can. John Searle objects to what he calls “strong AI,” the claim that the brain is just one type of hardware that can “run” the program that is essentially the human mind, and thus that if computers cannot currently think, they will one day be able to. Searle supports his claim on the basis that while computers run entirely syntactically, viewing information as abstract symbols with no meaning and reacting to them based off of their shape, the human mind has the additional layer of semantics that can not be obtained from syntax alone. Thus, John Searle proves that no matter how advanced technology becomes, a computer will never think in the same way that a human can.…